Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review.

Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research Pub Date : 2018-09-30 eCollection Date: 2018-07-01 DOI:10.5037/jomr.2018.9301
Thomas Starch-Jensen, Annette Dalgaard Kjellerup, Tue Lindberg Blæhr
{"title":"Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review.","authors":"Thomas Starch-Jensen,&nbsp;Annette Dalgaard Kjellerup,&nbsp;Tue Lindberg Blæhr","doi":"10.5037/jomr.2018.9301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the present systematic review was to assess the transverse skeletal and dental arch expansion and relapse after mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with a bone-borne, tooth-borne or hybrid distraction appliance.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English until the 3<sup>rd</sup> of July, 2018 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two comparative and seven non-comparative studies characterized by high risk of bias fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Transverse mandibular widening was achieved with the different types of distraction appliance displaying a horizontal V-shaped opening with larger anterior transverse expansion declining progressively towards the posterior part of the mandible. Bone-borne and hybrid appliance facilitate more skeletal expansion compared with tooth-borne appliance, whereas comparable dental arch expansion was achieved with the different types of distraction appliance. Skeletal and dental arch relapse with the different type of appliance was limited and comparable. However, frequency of complications was higher with bone-borne appliance compared with tooth-borne or hybrid appliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with bone-borne, tooth-borne or hybrid distraction appliance is an effective treatment modality to correct severe transverse mandibular discrepancies, although the skeletal and dental arch expansion pattern was dissimilar with the different types of appliance. However, dissimilar evaluation methods, different outcome measures, various methodological confounding factors posed serious restrictions reviewing the literature in a quantitative systematic manner. Hence, well-designed long-term randomized controlled trials applying three-dimensional technology, patient-related outcome measures and an economic perspective are needed before definite conclusions can be provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":230885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research","volume":"9 3","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5037/jomr.2018.9301","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2018.9301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the present systematic review was to assess the transverse skeletal and dental arch expansion and relapse after mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with a bone-borne, tooth-borne or hybrid distraction appliance.

Material and methods: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English until the 3rd of July, 2018 were included.

Results: Two comparative and seven non-comparative studies characterized by high risk of bias fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Transverse mandibular widening was achieved with the different types of distraction appliance displaying a horizontal V-shaped opening with larger anterior transverse expansion declining progressively towards the posterior part of the mandible. Bone-borne and hybrid appliance facilitate more skeletal expansion compared with tooth-borne appliance, whereas comparable dental arch expansion was achieved with the different types of distraction appliance. Skeletal and dental arch relapse with the different type of appliance was limited and comparable. However, frequency of complications was higher with bone-borne appliance compared with tooth-borne or hybrid appliance.

Conclusions: Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with bone-borne, tooth-borne or hybrid distraction appliance is an effective treatment modality to correct severe transverse mandibular discrepancies, although the skeletal and dental arch expansion pattern was dissimilar with the different types of appliance. However, dissimilar evaluation methods, different outcome measures, various methodological confounding factors posed serious restrictions reviewing the literature in a quantitative systematic manner. Hence, well-designed long-term randomized controlled trials applying three-dimensional technology, patient-related outcome measures and an economic perspective are needed before definite conclusions can be provided.

Abstract Image

下颌中线牵张成骨与骨载、牙载或混合牵张器:系统回顾。
目的:本系统综述的目的是评估骨载、牙载或混合牵引器在下颌中线牵引成骨后的横向骨弓和牙弓扩张和复发。材料和方法:在MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行检索,并结合手工检索相关期刊。纳入了2018年7月3日之前用英语发表的人类研究。结果:2项比较研究和7项具有高偏倚风险的非比较研究符合纳入标准。通过不同类型的牵张器实现下颌横向扩大,显示一个水平的v形开口,前横向扩张较大,逐渐向下颌后部下降。与牙载矫治器相比,骨载矫治器和混合矫治器可促进更多的骨骼扩展,而不同类型的牵张矫治器可实现类似的牙弓扩展。不同类型矫治器的骨弓和牙弓复发是有限且具有可比性的。然而,骨载矫治器的并发症发生率高于牙载矫治器或混合矫治器。结论:下颌中线牵张成骨采用骨载、牙载或混合型牵张器是一种有效的治疗方法,尽管不同类型的牵张器的骨弓和牙弓扩张模式不同。然而,不同的评价方法、不同的结果测量、各种方法学上的混杂因素,严重限制了以定量系统的方式回顾文献。因此,在提供明确的结论之前,需要设计良好的长期随机对照试验,应用三维技术,患者相关的结果测量和经济角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信