Content in Simple Signalling Systems.

Nicholas Shea, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Rosa Cao
{"title":"Content in Simple Signalling Systems.","authors":"Nicholas Shea,&nbsp;Peter Godfrey-Smith,&nbsp;Rosa Cao","doi":"10.1093/bjps/axw036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our understanding of communication and its evolution has advanced significantly through the study of simple models involving interacting senders and receivers of signals. Many theorists have thought that the resources of mathematical information theory are all that are needed to capture the meaning or content that is being communicated in these systems. However, the way theorists routinely talk about the models implicitly draws on a conception of content that is richer than bare informational content, especially in contexts where false content is important. This article shows that this concept can be made precise by defining a notion of functional content that captures the degree to which different states of the world are involved in stabilizing senders' and receivers' use of a signal at equilibrium. A series of case studies is used to contrast functional content with informational content, and to illustrate the explanatory role and limitations of this definition of functional content. <b>1</b> <i>Introduction</i> <b>2</b> <i>Modelling Framework</i> <b>3</b> <i>Two Kinds of Content</i>  <b>3.1</b> <i>Informational content</i>  <b>3.2</b> <i>Functional content</i> <b>4</b> <i>Cases</i>  <b>4.1</b> <i>Case 1: Simplest case</i>  <b>4.2</b> <i>Case 2: Partial pooling</i>  <b>4.3</b> <i>Case 3: Bottleneck</i>  <b>4.4</b> <i>Case 4: Partial common interest</i>  <b>4.5</b> <i>Case 5: Deception</i>  <b>4.6</b> <i>Case 6: A further problem arising from divergent interests</i> <b>5</b> <i>Discussion</i> <i>Appendix</i> .</p>","PeriodicalId":509962,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"69 4","pages":"1009-1035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/bjps/axw036","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Our understanding of communication and its evolution has advanced significantly through the study of simple models involving interacting senders and receivers of signals. Many theorists have thought that the resources of mathematical information theory are all that are needed to capture the meaning or content that is being communicated in these systems. However, the way theorists routinely talk about the models implicitly draws on a conception of content that is richer than bare informational content, especially in contexts where false content is important. This article shows that this concept can be made precise by defining a notion of functional content that captures the degree to which different states of the world are involved in stabilizing senders' and receivers' use of a signal at equilibrium. A series of case studies is used to contrast functional content with informational content, and to illustrate the explanatory role and limitations of this definition of functional content. 1Introduction 2Modelling Framework 3Two Kinds of Content  3.1Informational content  3.2Functional content 4Cases  4.1Case 1: Simplest case  4.2Case 2: Partial pooling  4.3Case 3: Bottleneck  4.4Case 4: Partial common interest  4.5Case 5: Deception  4.6Case 6: A further problem arising from divergent interests 5Discussion Appendix .

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

简单信号系统中的内容。
通过研究信号的发送者和接收者相互作用的简单模型,我们对通信及其演变的理解取得了重大进展。许多理论家认为,数学信息论的资源是捕获这些系统中正在交流的意义或内容所需要的全部。然而,理论家通常谈论模型的方式隐含地借鉴了比单纯的信息内容更丰富的内容概念,特别是在虚假内容很重要的情况下。本文表明,通过定义功能内容的概念,可以使这个概念更加精确,该概念捕获了世界上不同状态在平衡状态下稳定发送者和接收者对信号的使用所涉及的程度。通过一系列的案例研究来对比功能性内容和信息性内容,并说明功能性内容定义的解释性作用和局限性。1介绍2建模框架3两种内容3.1信息性内容3.2功能性内容4案例4.1案例1:最简单案例4.2案例2:部分池化4.3案例3:瓶颈4.4案例4:部分共同利益4.5案例5:欺骗4.6案例6:利益分歧引起的进一步问题5讨论附录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信