Lipopolysaccharides in Food, Food Supplements, and Probiotics: Should We be Worried?

European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology Pub Date : 2018-08-21 eCollection Date: 2018-09-28 DOI:10.1556/1886.2018.00017
Trudy M Wassenaar, Kurt Zimmermann
{"title":"Lipopolysaccharides in Food, Food Supplements, and Probiotics: Should We be Worried?","authors":"Trudy M Wassenaar,&nbsp;Kurt Zimmermann","doi":"10.1556/1886.2018.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fever-inducing effect of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) is well known, and human blood is extremely responsive to this pyrogen. Recently, the safety of LPS-containing food supplements and probiotic drugs as immune-stimulants has been questioned, although these products are orally taken and do not reach the bloodstream undigested. The concerns are understandable, as endotoxaemia is a pathological condition, but the oral uptake of probiotic products containing LPS or Gram-negative bacteria does not pose a health risk, based on the available scientific evidence, as is reviewed here. The available methods developed to detect LPS and other pyrogens are mostly used for quality control of parentally applied therapeuticals. Their outcome varies considerably when applied to food supplements, as demonstrated in a simple comparative experiment. Products containing different <i>Escherichia coli</i> strains can result in vastly different results on their LPS content, depending on the method of testing. This is an inherent complication to pyrogen testing, which hampers the communication that the LPS content of food supplements is not a safety concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":11929,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","volume":"8 3","pages":"63-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1886.2018.00017","citationCount":"76","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2018.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 76

Abstract

The fever-inducing effect of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) is well known, and human blood is extremely responsive to this pyrogen. Recently, the safety of LPS-containing food supplements and probiotic drugs as immune-stimulants has been questioned, although these products are orally taken and do not reach the bloodstream undigested. The concerns are understandable, as endotoxaemia is a pathological condition, but the oral uptake of probiotic products containing LPS or Gram-negative bacteria does not pose a health risk, based on the available scientific evidence, as is reviewed here. The available methods developed to detect LPS and other pyrogens are mostly used for quality control of parentally applied therapeuticals. Their outcome varies considerably when applied to food supplements, as demonstrated in a simple comparative experiment. Products containing different Escherichia coli strains can result in vastly different results on their LPS content, depending on the method of testing. This is an inherent complication to pyrogen testing, which hampers the communication that the LPS content of food supplements is not a safety concern.

食品中的脂多糖、食品补充剂和益生菌:我们应该担心吗?
脂多糖(LPS)的发热诱导作用是众所周知的,人类血液对这种热原反应非常灵敏。最近,含有脂多糖的食品补充剂和益生菌药物作为免疫刺激剂的安全性受到质疑,尽管这些产品是口服的,不会未经消化进入血液。这些担忧是可以理解的,因为内毒素血症是一种病理情况,但根据现有的科学证据,口服含有LPS或革兰氏阴性菌的益生菌产品不会造成健康风险。现有的检测脂多糖和其他热原的方法大多用于父母使用的治疗药物的质量控制。一个简单的对比实验表明,当它们应用于食品补充剂时,结果会有很大的不同。根据测试方法的不同,含有不同大肠杆菌菌株的产品可能会导致其LPS含量的结果大相径庭。这是热原检测的固有并发症,它阻碍了食品补充剂中脂多糖含量不是安全问题的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信