Nijee S Luthra, Soeun Kim, Yunxi Zhang, Chadwick W Christine
{"title":"Characterization of vitamin D supplementation and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of early Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Nijee S Luthra, Soeun Kim, Yunxi Zhang, Chadwick W Christine","doi":"10.1186/s40734-018-0074-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vitamin D (VitD) deficiency is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and has been raised as a possible PD risk factor. In the past decade, VitD supplementation for potential prevention of age related conditions has become more common. In this study, we sought to characterize VitD supplementation in early PD and determine as an exploratory analysis whether baseline characteristics or disease progression differed according to reported VitD use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the National Institutes of Health Exploratory Trials in Parkinson's Disease (NET-PD) Long-term study (LS-1), a longitudinal study of 1741 participants. Subjects were divided into following supplement groups according to subject exposure (6 months prior to baseline and during the study): no VitD supplement, multivitamin (MVI), VitD ≥400 IU/day, and VitD + multivitamin (VitD+MVI). Clinical status was followed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, total daily levodopa equivalent dose, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 5% of subjects took VitD alone, 7% took VitD+MVI, 34% took MVI alone, while 54% took no supplement. Clinical outcomes at 3 years were similar across all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows VitD supplementation ≥400 IU/day was not common in early PD and that its use was similar to that seen in the US population. At 3 years, there was no difference in disease progression according to vitamin D supplement use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","volume":"5 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6208018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40734-018-0074-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Vitamin D (VitD) deficiency is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and has been raised as a possible PD risk factor. In the past decade, VitD supplementation for potential prevention of age related conditions has become more common. In this study, we sought to characterize VitD supplementation in early PD and determine as an exploratory analysis whether baseline characteristics or disease progression differed according to reported VitD use.
Methods: We analyzed data from the National Institutes of Health Exploratory Trials in Parkinson's Disease (NET-PD) Long-term study (LS-1), a longitudinal study of 1741 participants. Subjects were divided into following supplement groups according to subject exposure (6 months prior to baseline and during the study): no VitD supplement, multivitamin (MVI), VitD ≥400 IU/day, and VitD + multivitamin (VitD+MVI). Clinical status was followed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, total daily levodopa equivalent dose, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire.
Results: About 5% of subjects took VitD alone, 7% took VitD+MVI, 34% took MVI alone, while 54% took no supplement. Clinical outcomes at 3 years were similar across all groups.
Conclusion: This study shows VitD supplementation ≥400 IU/day was not common in early PD and that its use was similar to that seen in the US population. At 3 years, there was no difference in disease progression according to vitamin D supplement use.
背景:维生素 D(VitD)缺乏症在帕金森病(PD)中很常见,并被认为可能是帕金森病的一个风险因素。在过去十年中,补充维生素 D 以预防与年龄相关的疾病已变得越来越普遍。在这项研究中,我们试图描述早期帕金森病患者补充维生素D的情况,并作为一项探索性分析确定基线特征或疾病进展是否因报告的维生素D使用情况而有所不同:我们分析了美国国立卫生研究院帕金森病探索性试验(NET-PD)长期研究(LS-1)的数据,这是一项对1741名参与者进行的纵向研究。根据受试者的接触情况(基线前 6 个月和研究期间),受试者被分为以下补充剂组:无维生素 D 补充剂、多种维生素 (MVI)、维生素 D ≥400 IU/天和维生素 D + 多种维生素 (VitD+MVI)。使用帕金森病统一评分量表、符号数字模型测试、每日左旋多巴总当量剂量和帕金森病问卷调查跟踪临床状况:约5%的受试者只服用维生素D,7%的受试者服用维生素D+MVI,34%的受试者只服用MVI,54%的受试者不服用任何补充剂。各组 3 年的临床结果相似:这项研究表明,维生素D补充剂≥400 IU/天在早期帕金森病中并不常见,其使用情况与美国人群相似。3年后,根据维生素D补充剂的使用情况,疾病进展情况没有差异。