Exploring Responsible Neuroimaging Innovation: Visions From a Societal Actor Perspective.

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Marlous E Arentshorst, Tjard de Cock Buning, Jacqueline E W Broerse
{"title":"Exploring Responsible Neuroimaging Innovation: Visions From a Societal Actor Perspective.","authors":"Marlous E Arentshorst,&nbsp;Tjard de Cock Buning,&nbsp;Jacqueline E W Broerse","doi":"10.1177/0270467617727457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Apart from the scientific unknowns and technological barriers that complicate the development of medical neuroimaging applications, various relevant actors might have different ideas on what is considered advancement or progress in this field. We address the challenge of identifying societal actors and their different points of view concerning neuroimaging technologies in an early phase of neuroimaging development. To this end, we conducted 16 semistructured interviews with societal actors, including governmental policy makers, health professionals, and patient representatives, in the Netherlands. We show how the contextual aspects of applications and underlying features of the ideal health system determine the desirability. Neuroimaging developments are perceived as innovations that will optimize the current health system or as opportunities to change existing structures and practices of the current health system more radically. Insights into and understanding of these visions show incongruence between visions regarding desirable medical neuroimaging use and potential conflicting visions regarding the embedding of neuroimaging applications. We conclude that it is possible to prospectively identify incongruent visions and analyze when these visions will most likely come into conflict with each other. Such an analysis might provide a reflective space, beyond personal and political interest, suitable as a starting point for joint reflection and mutual learning in order to manage medical neuroimaging innovations towards more responsible applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":38848,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society","volume":"36 4","pages":"229-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0270467617727457","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467617727457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Apart from the scientific unknowns and technological barriers that complicate the development of medical neuroimaging applications, various relevant actors might have different ideas on what is considered advancement or progress in this field. We address the challenge of identifying societal actors and their different points of view concerning neuroimaging technologies in an early phase of neuroimaging development. To this end, we conducted 16 semistructured interviews with societal actors, including governmental policy makers, health professionals, and patient representatives, in the Netherlands. We show how the contextual aspects of applications and underlying features of the ideal health system determine the desirability. Neuroimaging developments are perceived as innovations that will optimize the current health system or as opportunities to change existing structures and practices of the current health system more radically. Insights into and understanding of these visions show incongruence between visions regarding desirable medical neuroimaging use and potential conflicting visions regarding the embedding of neuroimaging applications. We conclude that it is possible to prospectively identify incongruent visions and analyze when these visions will most likely come into conflict with each other. Such an analysis might provide a reflective space, beyond personal and political interest, suitable as a starting point for joint reflection and mutual learning in order to manage medical neuroimaging innovations towards more responsible applications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

探索负责任的神经影像学创新:从社会行动者的角度来看。
除了科学上的未知因素和技术障碍使医学神经成像应用的发展复杂化之外,不同的相关行为者可能对该领域的进步或进展有不同的看法。我们解决了在神经成像发展的早期阶段识别社会行为者和他们对神经成像技术的不同观点的挑战。为此,我们在荷兰对包括政府决策者、卫生专业人员和患者代表在内的社会行为者进行了16次半结构化访谈。我们展示了应用程序的上下文方面和理想卫生系统的潜在特征如何决定可取性。神经影像学的发展被认为是将优化当前卫生系统的创新,或者是更彻底地改变当前卫生系统现有结构和做法的机会。对这些愿景的洞察和理解表明,关于理想的医学神经成像应用的愿景与关于神经成像应用嵌入的潜在冲突愿景之间存在不一致。我们的结论是,有可能前瞻性地识别不一致的愿景,并分析这些愿景何时最有可能相互冲突。这种分析可能提供一个超越个人和政治利益的反思空间,适合作为共同反思和相互学习的起点,以便管理医学神经成像创新,使其朝着更负责任的应用方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信