K V Shishova, E A Lavrentyeva, A I Khamidullina, O V Zatsepina
{"title":"[Position of the Nucleus in Mouse Germinal Vesicle–Stage Oocytes with Different Chromatin Configurations].","authors":"K V Shishova, E A Lavrentyeva, A I Khamidullina, O V Zatsepina","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mammalian germinal vesicle–stage (GV) oocytes are divided into two major types, NSN\n(non-surrounded nucleolus) and SN (surrounded nucleolus), and at least one intermediate type, pSN (partly\nsurrounded nucleolus), based on large-scale chromatin configuration. In mice, the SN oocytes are considered\nto be the most meiotically competent, which explains active study of their phenotypic characteristics\nnecessary for improvement of human reproductive technologies. One of such characteristics is the position\nof the GV (nucleus) relative to the center of the oocyte. However, the current data on this issue are contradictory\nand even completely absent for pSN oocytes. In this work, we have studied the GV position in 187\nmouse GV oocytes belonging to NSN, SN, and pSN types using different approaches known from the literature.\nOur results suggest that (1) the most abundant in all examined types of oocytes are central GVs (43–\n66%) and the least abundant are peripheral GVs (12–39%); the pSN oocytes are closer to SN oocytes rather\nthan to NSN oocytes according to the GV position; (3) the position of the nucleus in mouse GV oocytes is\nan ambiguous marker of large-scale chromatin configuration and, correspondingly, maturation competence\nof the oocyte; (4) the diversity of the GV position in NSN, SN, and pSN oocytes most likely reflects the ability\nof GVs to migrate; and (5) assessment of the GV position according to three variants (central, peripheral,\nand intermediate) is more informative as compared with two variants (central and peripheral).</p>","PeriodicalId":19673,"journal":{"name":"Ontogenez","volume":"47 6","pages":"331-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ontogenez","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The mammalian germinal vesicle–stage (GV) oocytes are divided into two major types, NSN
(non-surrounded nucleolus) and SN (surrounded nucleolus), and at least one intermediate type, pSN (partly
surrounded nucleolus), based on large-scale chromatin configuration. In mice, the SN oocytes are considered
to be the most meiotically competent, which explains active study of their phenotypic characteristics
necessary for improvement of human reproductive technologies. One of such characteristics is the position
of the GV (nucleus) relative to the center of the oocyte. However, the current data on this issue are contradictory
and even completely absent for pSN oocytes. In this work, we have studied the GV position in 187
mouse GV oocytes belonging to NSN, SN, and pSN types using different approaches known from the literature.
Our results suggest that (1) the most abundant in all examined types of oocytes are central GVs (43–
66%) and the least abundant are peripheral GVs (12–39%); the pSN oocytes are closer to SN oocytes rather
than to NSN oocytes according to the GV position; (3) the position of the nucleus in mouse GV oocytes is
an ambiguous marker of large-scale chromatin configuration and, correspondingly, maturation competence
of the oocyte; (4) the diversity of the GV position in NSN, SN, and pSN oocytes most likely reflects the ability
of GVs to migrate; and (5) assessment of the GV position according to three variants (central, peripheral,
and intermediate) is more informative as compared with two variants (central and peripheral).