Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Associations in People with and without Epilepsy.

IF 1.7 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neurology Research International Pub Date : 2018-08-28 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/7247605
Jocelyn Y Cheng
{"title":"Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Associations in People with and without Epilepsy.","authors":"Jocelyn Y Cheng","doi":"10.1155/2018/7247605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Positive airway pressure remains the gold-standard treatment for OSA, but many are intolerant. The neurotransmitter serotonin is involved in respiratory control. Evidence exists for SRIs in reducing OSA severity in the general population and ictal hypoxemia and seizure-induced respiratory arrest in people with epilepsy (PWE). However, the association between SRIs and OSA severity has not been studied in populations consisting of both groups. This study aims to determine if SRIs are associated with OSA severity in both PWE and people without epilepsy (PWO) and whether differences exist between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of adults with OSA was conducted. Subjects were categorized as PWE or PWO and for the use (+SRI) or absence (-SRI) of an SRI. The primary outcome was OSA severity relative to SRI status. OSA severity as a function of SRI status was also compared between PWE and PWO and within the PWE and PWO cohorts. Oxygen saturation nadir was a secondary outcome measure. Statistical adjustment of pertinent characteristics was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 125 subjects (57 PWE, 68 PWO, 80 -SRI, and 45 +SRI). +SRI was associated with reduced odds of severe compared to moderate OSA, in unadjusted and adjusted analysis. Compared to PWO, PWE demonstrated a more robust association between OSA severity and +SRI. When analyzed as separate cohorts, only PWE demonstrated reduced OSA severity, with adjustment for age (OR:0.140, CI:0.021-1.116, and p=0.042). Oxygen saturation nadir was not significant in any model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SRIs represent a potential treatment option for OSA and may demonstrate a more robust association with reduced OSA severity in PWE compared to PWO.</p>","PeriodicalId":19124,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Research International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/7247605","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7247605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: Positive airway pressure remains the gold-standard treatment for OSA, but many are intolerant. The neurotransmitter serotonin is involved in respiratory control. Evidence exists for SRIs in reducing OSA severity in the general population and ictal hypoxemia and seizure-induced respiratory arrest in people with epilepsy (PWE). However, the association between SRIs and OSA severity has not been studied in populations consisting of both groups. This study aims to determine if SRIs are associated with OSA severity in both PWE and people without epilepsy (PWO) and whether differences exist between the two groups.

Methods: A retrospective study of adults with OSA was conducted. Subjects were categorized as PWE or PWO and for the use (+SRI) or absence (-SRI) of an SRI. The primary outcome was OSA severity relative to SRI status. OSA severity as a function of SRI status was also compared between PWE and PWO and within the PWE and PWO cohorts. Oxygen saturation nadir was a secondary outcome measure. Statistical adjustment of pertinent characteristics was performed.

Results: There were 125 subjects (57 PWE, 68 PWO, 80 -SRI, and 45 +SRI). +SRI was associated with reduced odds of severe compared to moderate OSA, in unadjusted and adjusted analysis. Compared to PWO, PWE demonstrated a more robust association between OSA severity and +SRI. When analyzed as separate cohorts, only PWE demonstrated reduced OSA severity, with adjustment for age (OR:0.140, CI:0.021-1.116, and p=0.042). Oxygen saturation nadir was not significant in any model.

Conclusions: SRIs represent a potential treatment option for OSA and may demonstrate a more robust association with reduced OSA severity in PWE compared to PWO.

5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:与癫痫患者和非癫痫患者的关联。
目的:气道正压仍然是治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的金标准,但许多人不耐受。神经递质血清素参与呼吸控制。有证据表明,SRIs可以降低一般人群的OSA严重程度,以及癫痫患者(PWE)的致命低氧血症和癫痫发作性呼吸骤停。然而,SRIs与OSA严重程度之间的关系尚未在两组人群中进行研究。本研究旨在确定SRIs是否与PWE和非ppo患者的OSA严重程度相关,以及两组之间是否存在差异。方法:对成人OSA患者进行回顾性研究。受试者被分类为PWE或ppo,以及使用(+SRI)或不使用(-SRI)的SRI。主要结局是OSA严重程度与SRI状态的关系。OSA严重程度作为SRI状态的函数也在PWE和po之间以及PWE和po队列中进行了比较。氧饱和度最低点是次要的结局指标。对相关特征进行统计校正。结果:125例患者(PWE 57例,PWE 68例,-SRI 80例,+SRI 45例)。在未调整和调整分析中,与中度OSA相比,+SRI与严重OSA的发生率降低相关。与PWE相比,PWE在OSA严重程度和+SRI之间表现出更强的相关性。当作为单独的队列进行分析时,只有PWE显示出OSA严重程度降低,并随年龄调整(OR:0.140, CI:0.021-1.116, p=0.042)。氧饱和度最低点在各模型中均不显著。结论:SRIs是OSA的一种潜在治疗选择,与PWE相比,SRIs可能与降低PWE的OSA严重程度有更强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on diseases of the nervous system, as well as normal neurological functioning. The journal will consider basic, translational, and clinical research, including animal models and clinical trials.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信