Visual disturbance or central symptom like hallucination in patients treated voriconazole: report of six cases.

The Japanese journal of antibiotics Pub Date : 2016-09-01
Hideo Kato, Mao Hagihara, Yukihiro Hamada, Yusuke Koizumi, Naoya Nishiyama, Yuka Yamagishi, Katsuhiko Matsuura, Hiroshige Mikamo
{"title":"Visual disturbance or central symptom like hallucination in patients treated voriconazole: report of six cases.","authors":"Hideo Kato,&nbsp;Mao Hagihara,&nbsp;Yukihiro Hamada,&nbsp;Yusuke Koizumi,&nbsp;Naoya Nishiyama,&nbsp;Yuka Yamagishi,&nbsp;Katsuhiko Matsuura,&nbsp;Hiroshige Mikamo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual disturbance or central symptom like hallucination is well known to be one of the common drug adverse events in response to voriconazole (VRCZ). We observed 123 patients treated VRCZ from April 2012 to January 2016. Two of these cases experienced visual disturbance and 4 of these cases experienced central symptom. Six patients appeared visual disturbance or central symptom within 1 week after administration of VRCZ (visual disturbance; 3 days [2-42 days], central symptom; 6 days [3-9 days]) and disappeared visual disturbance or central symptom at an early date after discontinuation of administration or decreasing dose of VRCZ. The trough concentration of VRCZ in patients who experienced central symptom was similar with that in-patients who did not experience adverse events by VRCZ (case 3; 3.79μg/ mL, case 4; 1.28μg/mL vs 3.73μg/mL [0.09-13.27 μg/mL]). On the other hand, the trough concentration of VRCZ in patients who experienced visual disturbance was higher than that in patients who did not experience adverse events by VRCZ (case 5; 7.49μg/mL, case 6; 4.45μg/ mL vs 3.73μg/mL [0.09-13.27μg/mL]). In conclusion, we thought that the risk factor of visual disturbance was the increasing concentration of VRCZ. Therefore, we should monitor the onset of visual disturbance or central symptom in patients treated with VRCZ, especially central symptom that the concentration is unconcerned.</p>","PeriodicalId":22536,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual disturbance or central symptom like hallucination is well known to be one of the common drug adverse events in response to voriconazole (VRCZ). We observed 123 patients treated VRCZ from April 2012 to January 2016. Two of these cases experienced visual disturbance and 4 of these cases experienced central symptom. Six patients appeared visual disturbance or central symptom within 1 week after administration of VRCZ (visual disturbance; 3 days [2-42 days], central symptom; 6 days [3-9 days]) and disappeared visual disturbance or central symptom at an early date after discontinuation of administration or decreasing dose of VRCZ. The trough concentration of VRCZ in patients who experienced central symptom was similar with that in-patients who did not experience adverse events by VRCZ (case 3; 3.79μg/ mL, case 4; 1.28μg/mL vs 3.73μg/mL [0.09-13.27 μg/mL]). On the other hand, the trough concentration of VRCZ in patients who experienced visual disturbance was higher than that in patients who did not experience adverse events by VRCZ (case 5; 7.49μg/mL, case 6; 4.45μg/ mL vs 3.73μg/mL [0.09-13.27μg/mL]). In conclusion, we thought that the risk factor of visual disturbance was the increasing concentration of VRCZ. Therefore, we should monitor the onset of visual disturbance or central symptom in patients treated with VRCZ, especially central symptom that the concentration is unconcerned.

伏立康唑治疗患者出现视觉障碍或幻觉等中心症状6例报告。
视觉障碍或幻觉等中心症状是伏立康唑(voriconazole, VRCZ)常见的药物不良反应之一。2012年4月至2016年1月,我们观察了123例接受VRCZ治疗的患者。其中2例出现视觉障碍,4例出现中心症状。6例患者在给予VRCZ后1周内出现视力障碍或中心症状(视力障碍;3天[2-42天],中心症状;6天[3-9天]),停药或减量后视力障碍或中心症状尽早消失。出现中心症状患者的VRCZ谷浓度与未出现VRCZ不良事件的住院患者相似(病例3;3.79μg/ mL,病例4;1.28μg/mL vs 3.73μg/mL [0.09-13.27 μg/mL])。另一方面,出现视觉障碍的患者的VRCZ谷浓度高于未出现VRCZ不良事件的患者(病例5;7.49μg/mL,病例6;4.45μg/ mL vs 3.73μg/mL [0.09-13.27μg/mL])。综上所述,我们认为VRCZ浓度升高是造成视觉障碍的危险因素。因此,应监测VRCZ患者是否出现视觉障碍或中枢症状,尤其是浓度不高的中枢症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信