In vitro activity of sitafloxacin against atypical bacteria (2009-2014) and comparison between susceptibility of clinical isolates in 2009 and 2012.

The Japanese journal of antibiotics Pub Date : 2016-09-01
Ayako Amano, Naoko Kishi, Hideaki Koyama, Kaoru Matsuzaki, Satoru Matsumoto, Kazuhiro Uchino, Hiroki Yamaguchi, Aki Yokomizo, Masami Mizuno
{"title":"In vitro activity of sitafloxacin against atypical bacteria (2009-2014) and comparison between susceptibility of clinical isolates in 2009 and 2012.","authors":"Ayako Amano,&nbsp;Naoko Kishi,&nbsp;Hideaki Koyama,&nbsp;Kaoru Matsuzaki,&nbsp;Satoru Matsumoto,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Uchino,&nbsp;Hiroki Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Aki Yokomizo,&nbsp;Masami Mizuno","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro activities of sitafloxacin (STFX) along with fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin (LVFX), moxifloxacin (MFLX), garenoxacin (GRNX)) and macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin) against atypical bacteria (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae) recovered from clinical specimens from 2009 to 2014 at different healthcare facilities in Japan were investigated. The minimum inhibitory concentration of STFX at which 90% of isolates (MIC₉₀) against M pneumoniae (n= 14) was 0.03μg/mL which was comparable to GRNX, 4- and 16-fold more active than MFLX and LVFX, respectively. Reduced susceptibilities of M pneumoniae (9/14 isolates) to macrolides were observed. MIC₉₀ of STFX against L. pneumophila (n =15) was 0.004μg/mL which was 2- and 4-fold more active than GRNX/LVFX and MFLX, respectively. The minimum inhibitory concentration range of STFX against C. trachomatis (n=5) and C. pneumoniae (n=5) were from 0.015 to 0.03 and from 0.03 to 0.06μg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, differences between the activities of STFX against various clinical isolates in 2009 and those in 2012, which were already published in two articles (Jpn. J. Antibiotics 63:411- 430, 2010, 66:311-330, 2013), were also evaluated. The MIC90s of STFX against methicillin- susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus faecalis isolated in 2012 were 4 or 8 times higher than those in 2009, however there was no difference between STFX activities against other species in 2009 and those in 2012. In conclusion, STFX showed potent activity against atypical bacteria (M pneumoniae, L. pneumophila, C. trachomatis, C. pneumoniae) and no tendency for emergence resistance to Gram- positive cocci, Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes except MSSA, Streptococcus spp. andt. faecalis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22536,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vitro activities of sitafloxacin (STFX) along with fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin (LVFX), moxifloxacin (MFLX), garenoxacin (GRNX)) and macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin) against atypical bacteria (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae) recovered from clinical specimens from 2009 to 2014 at different healthcare facilities in Japan were investigated. The minimum inhibitory concentration of STFX at which 90% of isolates (MIC₉₀) against M pneumoniae (n= 14) was 0.03μg/mL which was comparable to GRNX, 4- and 16-fold more active than MFLX and LVFX, respectively. Reduced susceptibilities of M pneumoniae (9/14 isolates) to macrolides were observed. MIC₉₀ of STFX against L. pneumophila (n =15) was 0.004μg/mL which was 2- and 4-fold more active than GRNX/LVFX and MFLX, respectively. The minimum inhibitory concentration range of STFX against C. trachomatis (n=5) and C. pneumoniae (n=5) were from 0.015 to 0.03 and from 0.03 to 0.06μg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, differences between the activities of STFX against various clinical isolates in 2009 and those in 2012, which were already published in two articles (Jpn. J. Antibiotics 63:411- 430, 2010, 66:311-330, 2013), were also evaluated. The MIC90s of STFX against methicillin- susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus faecalis isolated in 2012 were 4 or 8 times higher than those in 2009, however there was no difference between STFX activities against other species in 2009 and those in 2012. In conclusion, STFX showed potent activity against atypical bacteria (M pneumoniae, L. pneumophila, C. trachomatis, C. pneumoniae) and no tendency for emergence resistance to Gram- positive cocci, Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes except MSSA, Streptococcus spp. andt. faecalis.

2009-2014年西他沙星体外抗非典型细菌活性及2009年与2012年临床分离株药敏比较。
研究了西他沙星(STFX)与氟喹诺酮类药物(左氧氟沙星(LVFX)、莫西沙星(MFLX)、加诺沙星(GRNX))和大环内酯类药物(阿奇霉素、克拉霉素)对2009 - 2014年日本不同医疗机构临床标本中非典型细菌(肺炎支原体、亲肺军团菌、沙眼衣原体、肺炎衣原体)的体外活性。90%的分离株(MIC₉0)对肺炎M (n= 14)的最低抑制浓度为0.03μg/mL,与GRNX相当,活性分别比MFLX和LVFX高4倍和16倍。观察到肺炎分枝杆菌(9/14株)对大环内酯类药物的敏感性降低。STFX对L. pneumophila (n =15)的MIC₉0为0.004μg/mL,活性分别比GRNX/LVFX和MFLX高2倍和4倍。STFX对沙眼衣原体(n=5)和肺炎衣原体(n=5)的最小抑制浓度范围分别为0.015 ~ 0.03和0.03 ~ 0.06μg/mL。此外,2009年与2012年STFX对各种临床分离株的活性差异已经在两篇文章中发表(Jpn。[j] .抗菌药物学报,2010,66:311- 330,2013)。2012年分离的STFX对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)、链球菌和粪肠球菌的mic90分别是2009年的4倍和8倍,但对其他菌种的活性与2012年没有差异。结果表明,STFX对非典型细菌(肺炎支原体、嗜肺乳杆菌、沙眼衣原体、肺炎支原体)具有较强的抗性,对革兰氏阳性球菌、革兰氏阴性菌和除MSSA、链球菌和t外的厌氧菌无出现耐药性的趋势。粪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信