Percutaneous Lumbar Laser Discectomy: Literature Review and a Retrospective Analysis of 65 Cases.

Q2 Medicine
Photomedicine and laser surgery Pub Date : 2018-10-01 Epub Date: 2018-09-18 DOI:10.1089/pho.2018.4460
Nitesh Patel, Vikram Singh
{"title":"Percutaneous Lumbar Laser Discectomy: Literature Review and a Retrospective Analysis of 65 Cases.","authors":"Nitesh Patel,&nbsp;Vikram Singh","doi":"10.1089/pho.2018.4460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous lumbar laser discectomy is a minimally invasive treatment option for patients with a contained disc herniation with back and/or leg pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to present our experience and results with patients who underwent percutaneous lumbar laser discectomy in our practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 65 patients were included, and their charts were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common level at which we performed the laser discectomy was the L5/S1 level 47.4% of the time. The next most common level was L4/L5 37.2% of the time and the least common level was L3/4 15.4% of the time. Neuritis was reported in four patients, which was treated with medication in two patients, and resolved in all four patients. The average preprocedure visual analog scale (VAS) score was 7.6/10 (range, 5-10/10). There was an improvement in the VAS score at 2-week follow-up. The average VAS score at 2-week follow-up was 3.7/10 (range, 0-10/10). The average VAS score at 6-week follow-up was 4.3/10 (range, 0-8/10). The average VAS score at 3-6 months was 4.1/10 [range, 0-8/10 and at 6-12 months was 4.2 (range, 0-8/10)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Appropriate patient selection and following a systematic stepwise approach are important in treatment planning for patients in whom percutaneous laser discectomy is being considered. Following appropriate patient selection criteria maximizes the success rate of percutaneous laser discectomy. In our experience with patients with persistent back and/or leg pain not responding appropriately to conservative therapy, percutaneous laser discectomy offers a minimally invasive treatment option with nominal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20117,"journal":{"name":"Photomedicine and laser surgery","volume":"36 10","pages":"518-521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/pho.2018.4460","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photomedicine and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2018.4460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous lumbar laser discectomy is a minimally invasive treatment option for patients with a contained disc herniation with back and/or leg pain.

Objective: The goal of this study was to present our experience and results with patients who underwent percutaneous lumbar laser discectomy in our practice.

Methods: A total of 65 patients were included, and their charts were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: The most common level at which we performed the laser discectomy was the L5/S1 level 47.4% of the time. The next most common level was L4/L5 37.2% of the time and the least common level was L3/4 15.4% of the time. Neuritis was reported in four patients, which was treated with medication in two patients, and resolved in all four patients. The average preprocedure visual analog scale (VAS) score was 7.6/10 (range, 5-10/10). There was an improvement in the VAS score at 2-week follow-up. The average VAS score at 2-week follow-up was 3.7/10 (range, 0-10/10). The average VAS score at 6-week follow-up was 4.3/10 (range, 0-8/10). The average VAS score at 3-6 months was 4.1/10 [range, 0-8/10 and at 6-12 months was 4.2 (range, 0-8/10)].

Conclusions: Appropriate patient selection and following a systematic stepwise approach are important in treatment planning for patients in whom percutaneous laser discectomy is being considered. Following appropriate patient selection criteria maximizes the success rate of percutaneous laser discectomy. In our experience with patients with persistent back and/or leg pain not responding appropriately to conservative therapy, percutaneous laser discectomy offers a minimally invasive treatment option with nominal complications.

经皮腰椎间盘激光切除术:65例文献回顾及回顾性分析。
背景:经皮腰椎间盘激光切除术是一种微创治疗方案,适用于腰椎间盘突出伴背部和/或腿部疼痛的患者。目的:本研究的目的是介绍我们在经皮腰椎激光椎间盘切除术患者中的经验和结果。方法:对65例患者的病历进行回顾性分析。结果:激光椎间盘切除术最常见的水平是L5/S1水平,占47.4%。其次是L4/L5(37.2%),其次是L3/4(15.4%)。4例患者报告神经炎,其中2例患者接受药物治疗,4例患者均痊愈。术前视觉模拟评分(VAS)平均评分为7.6/10(范围5-10/10)。2周随访时VAS评分有所改善。2周随访时VAS平均评分为3.7/10(范围0-10/10)。6周随访时VAS平均评分为4.3/10(范围0-8/10)。3-6个月平均VAS评分为4.1/10[范围0-8/10],6-12个月平均VAS评分为4.2(范围0-8/10)。结论:适当的患者选择和遵循系统的逐步方法对于考虑经皮激光椎间盘切除术的患者的治疗计划是重要的。遵循适当的患者选择标准可使经皮激光椎间盘切除术的成功率最大化。根据我们的经验,对于保守治疗无效的持续性背部和/或腿部疼痛患者,经皮激光椎间盘切除术提供了一种微创治疗选择,并发症很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery (formerly Photomedicine and Laser Surgery) is the essential journal for cutting-edge advances and research in phototherapy, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and laser medicine and surgery. The Journal delivers basic and clinical findings and procedures to improve the knowledge and application of these techniques in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信