The impact of successful learning of self-regulation on reward processing in children with ADHD using fMRI.

Sarah Baumeister, Isabella Wolf, Sarah Hohmann, Nathalie Holz, Regina Boecker-Schlier, Tobias Banaschewski, Daniel Brandeis
{"title":"The impact of successful learning of self-regulation on reward processing in children with ADHD using fMRI.","authors":"Sarah Baumeister,&nbsp;Isabella Wolf,&nbsp;Sarah Hohmann,&nbsp;Nathalie Holz,&nbsp;Regina Boecker-Schlier,&nbsp;Tobias Banaschewski,&nbsp;Daniel Brandeis","doi":"10.1007/s12402-018-0269-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurofeedback (NF) is a non-pharmacological treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) that is targeting self-regulation, is efficacious when standard protocols are used and induces partly specific neurophysiological changes in the inhibitory network. However, its effects on reward processing, which is also considered an important aspect of ADHD and has been linked to neurophysiological deficits, remain unknown. Children with ADHD (N = 15, mean age 11.8, SD 1.52) were randomly assigned to either slow cortical potential NF (n = 8) or EMG biofeedback control training (n = 7) and received 20 sessions of training under comparable conditions. Learning was defined as the slope of successful training runs across all transfer sessions. Whole brain analysis, region-of-interest analysis of anticipatory ventral striatal (VS) activation, and analysis of behavioral data were performed. Clinically, the NF group improved more than the EMG group. Whole brain analysis indicated increased activation in the left superior frontal gyrus in the control group only, and in medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal gyrus (DLPFC) after treatment across all groups. Only successful learners of self-regulation (n = 8) showed increased left inferior frontal gyrus and DLPFC activation after treatment. Left VS activation was increased after treatment and showed a significant time*medication-status interaction. Specific treatment effects were found in left frontal regions for the control treatment and successful learners. Also, unmedicated participants, irrespective of treatment type or successful learning, showed treatment-induced improvement in reward processing. The results suggest no prominent specific effect of NF on reward processing. However, cautious interpretation is warranted due to the small sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":88387,"journal":{"name":"Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders","volume":"11 1","pages":"31-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12402-018-0269-6","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-018-0269-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Neurofeedback (NF) is a non-pharmacological treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) that is targeting self-regulation, is efficacious when standard protocols are used and induces partly specific neurophysiological changes in the inhibitory network. However, its effects on reward processing, which is also considered an important aspect of ADHD and has been linked to neurophysiological deficits, remain unknown. Children with ADHD (N = 15, mean age 11.8, SD 1.52) were randomly assigned to either slow cortical potential NF (n = 8) or EMG biofeedback control training (n = 7) and received 20 sessions of training under comparable conditions. Learning was defined as the slope of successful training runs across all transfer sessions. Whole brain analysis, region-of-interest analysis of anticipatory ventral striatal (VS) activation, and analysis of behavioral data were performed. Clinically, the NF group improved more than the EMG group. Whole brain analysis indicated increased activation in the left superior frontal gyrus in the control group only, and in medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal gyrus (DLPFC) after treatment across all groups. Only successful learners of self-regulation (n = 8) showed increased left inferior frontal gyrus and DLPFC activation after treatment. Left VS activation was increased after treatment and showed a significant time*medication-status interaction. Specific treatment effects were found in left frontal regions for the control treatment and successful learners. Also, unmedicated participants, irrespective of treatment type or successful learning, showed treatment-induced improvement in reward processing. The results suggest no prominent specific effect of NF on reward processing. However, cautious interpretation is warranted due to the small sample.

使用功能磁共振成像研究自我调节成功学习对ADHD儿童奖励加工的影响。
神经反馈(NF)是一种针对自我调节的注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的非药物治疗方法,在使用标准方案时有效,并在抑制网络中诱导部分特定的神经生理变化。然而,它对奖励处理的影响仍然未知,奖励处理也被认为是ADHD的一个重要方面,并与神经生理缺陷有关。ADHD儿童(N = 15,平均年龄11.8,标准差1.52)被随机分配到慢皮质电位NF (N = 8)或肌电生物反馈控制训练(N = 7),并在可比条件下接受20次训练。学习被定义为所有迁移过程中成功训练的斜率。全脑分析、预期腹侧纹状体(VS)激活的兴趣区分析和行为数据分析。临床观察,NF组改善程度高于肌电图组。全脑分析表明,只有对照组的左额上回激活增加,所有组治疗后内侧前额叶皮层和背外侧前额叶回(DLPFC)激活增加。只有成功的自我调节学习者(n = 8)在治疗后显示左侧额下回和DLPFC激活增加。治疗后左VS激活增加,并表现出显著的时间*药物-状态相互作用。在对照组和成功学习者的左额叶区域发现了特定的治疗效果。同样,未服用药物的参与者,无论治疗类型或成功的学习,都表现出治疗引起的奖励处理的改善。结果表明,NF对奖励加工没有显著的特异性影响。然而,由于样本小,谨慎的解释是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信