"Not just dogs, but rabid dogs": tensions and conflicts amongst research volunteers in Malawi.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2018-09-03 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2018.1509925
Mackwellings Phiri, Kate Gooding, Deborah Nyirenda, Rodrick Sambakunsi, Moses Kelly Kumwenda, Nicola Desmond
{"title":"\"Not just dogs, but rabid dogs\": tensions and conflicts amongst research volunteers in Malawi.","authors":"Mackwellings Phiri,&nbsp;Kate Gooding,&nbsp;Deborah Nyirenda,&nbsp;Rodrick Sambakunsi,&nbsp;Moses Kelly Kumwenda,&nbsp;Nicola Desmond","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2018.1509925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Building trust between researchers and communities involved in research is one goal of community engagement. This paper examines the implications of community engagement for trust within communities, including trust among community volunteers who assist with research and between these volunteers and other community members. We describe the experiences of two groups of community volunteers recruited as part of an HIV and TB intervention trial in Malawi: cluster representatives, recruited both to act as key informants for TB suspects and mortality reporting and to identify and report community concerns, and community counsellors, recruited to provide semi-supervised HIV self-testing. We examine tensions experienced due to playing multiple roles, and the implications of volunteer responsibilities for short- and long-term community relationships. Data was collected through a workshop, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with volunteers and community members. While the volunteer system initially enhanced trust among volunteers and with the community, relationships deteriorated when cluster representatives assumed an additional supervisory role part-way through the trial. Combined with challenging recruitment targets and unequal power relations between volunteers, this new role damaged trust, with implications for volunteer well-being and social relationships. These experiences suggest researchers should consider potential social implications when designing community engagement systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/11287462.2018.1509925","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2018.1509925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Building trust between researchers and communities involved in research is one goal of community engagement. This paper examines the implications of community engagement for trust within communities, including trust among community volunteers who assist with research and between these volunteers and other community members. We describe the experiences of two groups of community volunteers recruited as part of an HIV and TB intervention trial in Malawi: cluster representatives, recruited both to act as key informants for TB suspects and mortality reporting and to identify and report community concerns, and community counsellors, recruited to provide semi-supervised HIV self-testing. We examine tensions experienced due to playing multiple roles, and the implications of volunteer responsibilities for short- and long-term community relationships. Data was collected through a workshop, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with volunteers and community members. While the volunteer system initially enhanced trust among volunteers and with the community, relationships deteriorated when cluster representatives assumed an additional supervisory role part-way through the trial. Combined with challenging recruitment targets and unequal power relations between volunteers, this new role damaged trust, with implications for volunteer well-being and social relationships. These experiences suggest researchers should consider potential social implications when designing community engagement systems.

Abstract Image

“不仅仅是狗,还有疯狗”:马拉维研究志愿者之间的紧张和冲突。
在研究人员和参与研究的社区之间建立信任是社区参与的一个目标。本文探讨了社区参与对社区内部信任的影响,包括协助研究的社区志愿者之间的信任以及这些志愿者与其他社区成员之间的信任。我们描述了作为马拉维艾滋病毒和结核病干预试验的一部分而招募的两组社区志愿者的经历:招募集群代表,作为结核病嫌疑人和死亡率报告的关键举报人,并确定和报告社区关注的问题;招募社区顾问,提供半监督的艾滋病毒自我检测。我们研究了由于扮演多种角色而经历的紧张关系,以及志愿者责任对短期和长期社区关系的影响。通过讲习班、深入访谈和与志愿者和社区成员的焦点小组讨论收集数据。虽然志愿者制度最初增强了志愿者之间和社区之间的信任,但在试验进行到一半的时候,集群代表承担了额外的监督作用,关系就恶化了。再加上具有挑战性的招聘目标和志愿者之间不平等的权力关系,这种新角色损害了信任,对志愿者的福祉和社会关系产生了影响。这些经验表明,研究人员在设计社区参与系统时应该考虑潜在的社会影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信