A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking - Current Trends in Practice Applications.

IF 0.4 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Open Ophthalmology Journal Pub Date : 2018-07-23 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874364101812010181
Li Lim, Elizabeth Wen Ling Lim
{"title":"A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking - Current Trends in Practice Applications.","authors":"Li Lim,&nbsp;Elizabeth Wen Ling Lim","doi":"10.2174/1874364101812010181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the literature on current applications of corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of publications on corneal cross-linking was conducted. This included systemic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-controlled studies and case series. A summary of the publications is tabulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original indication of riboflavin - Ultraviolet-A (UVA) induced corneal collagen cross-linking is to arrest the progression of keratoconus. Studies show that it is effective in arresting the progression of keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia with the standard Dresden protocol (epithelium-off). There are also improvements in visual, keratometric and topographic measurements over time. Severe complications of cross-linking are rare. The epithelium-on techniques have less efficacy than the Dresden protocol. Accelerated protocols have variable results, with some studies reporting comparable outcomes to the Dresden protocol while other studies reporting less efficacious outcomes. Cross-linking combined with refractive procedures provide better visual outcome but long term studies are warranted. Cross-linking for the treatment of infective keratitis is a promising new treatment modality. Initial studies show that it is more effective for superficial rather than deep infections and for bacterial rather than fungal infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Corneal cross-linking is a procedure with an expanding list of indications from the treatment of corneal ectasias to infective keratitis. While the standard Dresden protocol is established as the gold standard treatment for progressive keratoconus, the more recent protocols may require further refinements, investigative and long-term studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46347,"journal":{"name":"Open Ophthalmology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874364101812010181","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Ophthalmology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Objective: To review the literature on current applications of corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL).

Methods: A review of publications on corneal cross-linking was conducted. This included systemic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-controlled studies and case series. A summary of the publications is tabulated.

Results: The original indication of riboflavin - Ultraviolet-A (UVA) induced corneal collagen cross-linking is to arrest the progression of keratoconus. Studies show that it is effective in arresting the progression of keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia with the standard Dresden protocol (epithelium-off). There are also improvements in visual, keratometric and topographic measurements over time. Severe complications of cross-linking are rare. The epithelium-on techniques have less efficacy than the Dresden protocol. Accelerated protocols have variable results, with some studies reporting comparable outcomes to the Dresden protocol while other studies reporting less efficacious outcomes. Cross-linking combined with refractive procedures provide better visual outcome but long term studies are warranted. Cross-linking for the treatment of infective keratitis is a promising new treatment modality. Initial studies show that it is more effective for superficial rather than deep infections and for bacterial rather than fungal infections.

Conclusions: Corneal cross-linking is a procedure with an expanding list of indications from the treatment of corneal ectasias to infective keratitis. While the standard Dresden protocol is established as the gold standard treatment for progressive keratoconus, the more recent protocols may require further refinements, investigative and long-term studies.

角膜胶原交联研究进展及应用现状。
目的:综述角膜胶原交联(CXL)技术的应用现状。方法:回顾有关角膜交联的文献。这包括系统评价、随机对照临床试验、队列研究、病例对照研究和病例系列。现将出版物摘要制成表格。结果:核黄素-紫外线a (UVA)诱导的角膜胶原交联最初的适应症是阻止圆锥角膜的进展。研究表明,采用标准的德累斯顿方案(上皮脱落),它可以有效地阻止圆锥角膜的进展和lasik后的扩张。随着时间的推移,视觉、角膜测量和地形测量也有了改进。交联的严重并发症是罕见的。上皮移植技术的效果不如德累斯顿方案。加速方案有不同的结果,一些研究报告的结果与德累斯顿方案相当,而其他研究报告的结果则不那么有效。交联结合屈光手术提供了更好的视力结果,但需要长期研究。交联治疗感染性角膜炎是一种很有前景的新治疗方式。最初的研究表明,它对表面感染比深层感染更有效,对细菌感染比真菌感染更有效。结论:角膜交联术是一种从治疗角膜扩张到感染性角膜炎的适应症扩大的手术。虽然标准的德累斯顿方案被确立为进行性圆锥角膜的金标准治疗,但最近的方案可能需要进一步改进,调查和长期研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Open Ophthalmology Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in ophthalmology, including use of ophthalmological therapies, devices and surgical techniques. The Open Ophthalmology Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and making them freely available to researchers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信