Inequality and Mobility using Income, Consumption, and Wealth for the Same Individuals.

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jonathan Fisher, David Johnson, Jonathan Latner, Timothy Smeeding, Jeffrey Thompson
{"title":"Inequality and Mobility using Income, Consumption, and Wealth for the Same Individuals.","authors":"Jonathan Fisher, David Johnson, Jonathan Latner, Timothy Smeeding, Jeffrey Thompson","doi":"10.7758/RSF.2016.2.6.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies of economic inequality almost always separately examine income inequality, consumption inequality, and wealth inequality, and hence, these studies miss the important synergy between the three measures explicit in the life-cycle budget constraint. Using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we study inequality in three dimensions, focusing on the conjoint distributions of income, consumption, and wealth for the same individuals. We find that the trends in inequality in income, consumption, and wealth similarly increase between 1999 and 2013. We examine the pairwise distributions of our measures using the average propensity to consume and the wealth-income ratios. Using the longitudinal nature of the PSID, we follow people over this period and find mobility is similar using income, consumption and wealth. We conclude that while all three types of inequality are rising, wealth increasingly acts as a buffer to cushion income changes, which could reduce mobility - both intra- and inter-generational mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":51709,"journal":{"name":"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6097710/pdf/nihms-982828.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.6.03","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies of economic inequality almost always separately examine income inequality, consumption inequality, and wealth inequality, and hence, these studies miss the important synergy between the three measures explicit in the life-cycle budget constraint. Using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we study inequality in three dimensions, focusing on the conjoint distributions of income, consumption, and wealth for the same individuals. We find that the trends in inequality in income, consumption, and wealth similarly increase between 1999 and 2013. We examine the pairwise distributions of our measures using the average propensity to consume and the wealth-income ratios. Using the longitudinal nature of the PSID, we follow people over this period and find mobility is similar using income, consumption and wealth. We conclude that while all three types of inequality are rising, wealth increasingly acts as a buffer to cushion income changes, which could reduce mobility - both intra- and inter-generational mobility.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用相同个人的收入、消费和财富来衡量不平等和流动性。
近期有关经济不平等的研究几乎总是分别研究收入不平等、消费不平等和财富不平等,因此,这些研究忽略了生命周期预算约束中明确的三种衡量标准之间的重要协同作用。利用收入动态面板研究(PSID),我们从三个维度研究了不平等问题,重点关注同一个体的收入、消费和财富的联合分布。我们发现,1999 年至 2013 年间,收入、消费和财富的不平等趋势同样在加剧。我们使用平均消费倾向和财富收入比来研究我们的衡量指标的成对分布。利用 PSID 的纵向性质,我们对这一时期的人们进行了跟踪,发现收入、消费和财富的流动性是相似的。我们的结论是,虽然所有三种类型的不平等都在加剧,但财富越来越多地起到缓冲收入变化的作用,这可能会降低流动性--包括代内流动性和代际流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences
Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信