Appropriateness of Pharmacologic Prophylaxis against Deep Vein Thrombosis in Medical Wards of an Ethiopian Referral Hospital.

IF 2.5 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Journal of Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2018-07-11 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/8176898
Mohammed Biset Ayalew, Boressa Adugna Horsa, Meseret Tilahun Zeleke
{"title":"Appropriateness of Pharmacologic Prophylaxis against Deep Vein Thrombosis in Medical Wards of an Ethiopian Referral Hospital.","authors":"Mohammed Biset Ayalew, Boressa Adugna Horsa, Meseret Tilahun Zeleke","doi":"10.1155/2018/8176898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most of hospitalized patents are at risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The use of pharmacological prophylaxis significantly reduces the incidence of thromboembolic events in high risk patients. The aim of this study was to assess appropriateness of DVT prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients in an Ethiopian referral hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study design was employed. Patients with a diagnosis of DVT, taking anticoagulant therapy, and those who refused to participate were excluded from the study. Two hundred and six patients were included in the study using simple random sampling method. Modified Padua Risk Assessment Model was used to determine the risk of thromboembolism. SPSS (version 21) was used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The total risk score for the study subjects ranged from 0 to 11 with a mean score of 3.41 ± 2.55. Nearly half (47.6%) of study participants had high risk to develop thromboembolism. Thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50 billion/L) or coagulopathy, active hemorrhage, and end stage liver disease (INR > 1.5) were the frequently observed absolute contraindications that potentially prevent patients from receiving thromboprophylaxis. Thromboprophylaxis use in nearly one-third (31.6%) of patients admitted in the medical ward of UoGRH was irrational. Patients who had high risk for thromboembolism are more likely to be inappropriately managed for their risk of thromboembolism and patients with thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy were more likely to be managed appropriately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is underutilization of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in medical ward patients. Physicians working there should be aware of risk factors for DVT and indications for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis and should adhere to guideline recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14448,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8176898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most of hospitalized patents are at risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The use of pharmacological prophylaxis significantly reduces the incidence of thromboembolic events in high risk patients. The aim of this study was to assess appropriateness of DVT prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients in an Ethiopian referral hospital.

Methods: Cross-sectional study design was employed. Patients with a diagnosis of DVT, taking anticoagulant therapy, and those who refused to participate were excluded from the study. Two hundred and six patients were included in the study using simple random sampling method. Modified Padua Risk Assessment Model was used to determine the risk of thromboembolism. SPSS (version 21) was used for analysis.

Result: The total risk score for the study subjects ranged from 0 to 11 with a mean score of 3.41 ± 2.55. Nearly half (47.6%) of study participants had high risk to develop thromboembolism. Thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50 billion/L) or coagulopathy, active hemorrhage, and end stage liver disease (INR > 1.5) were the frequently observed absolute contraindications that potentially prevent patients from receiving thromboprophylaxis. Thromboprophylaxis use in nearly one-third (31.6%) of patients admitted in the medical ward of UoGRH was irrational. Patients who had high risk for thromboembolism are more likely to be inappropriately managed for their risk of thromboembolism and patients with thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy were more likely to be managed appropriately.

Conclusion: There is underutilization of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in medical ward patients. Physicians working there should be aware of risk factors for DVT and indications for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis and should adhere to guideline recommendations.

Abstract Image

埃塞俄比亚一家转诊医院内科病房对深静脉血栓的药物预防是否适当?
背景:大多数住院病人都有罹患深静脉血栓(DVT)的风险。使用药物预防可显著降低高危患者血栓栓塞事件的发生率。本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚一家转诊医院住院病人预防深静脉血栓形成的适当性:方法:采用横断面研究设计。研究排除了已确诊深静脉血栓、正在接受抗凝治疗以及拒绝参与研究的患者。研究采用简单随机抽样法,纳入了 26 名患者。采用改良帕多瓦风险评估模型确定血栓栓塞风险。采用 SPSS(21 版)进行分析:研究对象的风险总分在 0 到 11 之间,平均分为 3.41 ± 2.55。近一半(47.6%)的研究对象具有发生血栓栓塞的高风险。血小板减少症(血小板小于 500 亿/升)或凝血功能障碍、活动性出血和终末期肝病(INR > 1.5)是经常出现的绝对禁忌症,有可能导致患者无法接受血栓预防治疗。在格拉斯哥大学医学院内科病房住院的患者中,近三分之一(31.6%)的患者使用血栓预防药物是不合理的。血栓栓塞风险高的患者更有可能因其血栓栓塞风险而未得到适当管理,而血小板减少或凝血功能障碍的患者更有可能得到适当管理:内科病房患者血栓预防药物使用不足。在病房工作的医生应了解深静脉血栓形成的风险因素和药物血栓预防的适应症,并应遵守指南的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Vascular Medicine
International Journal of Vascular Medicine PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信