Magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopic measurement of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in major depression before and after electroconvulsive therapy.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Acta Neuropsychiatrica Pub Date : 2019-02-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-06 DOI:10.1017/neu.2018.22
Marie Krøll Knudsen, Jamie Near, Anne Bastholm Blicher, Poul Videbech, Jakob Udby Blicher
{"title":"Magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopic measurement of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in major depression before and after electroconvulsive therapy.","authors":"Marie Krøll Knudsen,&nbsp;Jamie Near,&nbsp;Anne Bastholm Blicher,&nbsp;Poul Videbech,&nbsp;Jakob Udby Blicher","doi":"10.1017/neu.2018.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prior studies suggest that a dysregulation of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is involved in the pathophysiology of major depression. We aimed to elucidate changes in cortical GABA content in relation to depression and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 11 patients with major depression or depressive episode of bipolar disorder (mean pre-ECT Ham-17 of 26) and 11 healthy subjects were recruited. GABA was quantified using short-TE MRS in prefrontal and occipital cortex. Other neurometabolites such as glutathione (GSH), N-acetylaspartate (NAA) and glutamate (Glu) were secondary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in GABA/Cr levels were observed between patients at baseline and healthy subjects in prefrontal cortex, t(20)=0.089, p=0.93 or occipital cortex t(21)=0.37, p=0.72. All patients improved on Ham-17 (mean post-ECT Ham-17 of 9). No significant difference was found in GABA, Glu, glutamine, choline or GSH between pre- and post-ECT values. However, we observed a significant decrease in NAA levels following ECT t(22)=3.89, p=0.0038, and a significant correlation between the NAA decline and the number of ECT sessions p=0.035.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study does not support prior studies arguing for GABA as a key factor in the treatment effect of ECT on major depression. The reduction in NAA levels following ECT could be due to neuronal loss or a transient dysfunction in prefrontal cortex. As no long-term follow-up scan was performed, it is unknown whether NAA levels will normalise over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48964,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/neu.2018.22","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2018.22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Objective: Prior studies suggest that a dysregulation of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is involved in the pathophysiology of major depression. We aimed to elucidate changes in cortical GABA content in relation to depression and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).

Methods: In total, 11 patients with major depression or depressive episode of bipolar disorder (mean pre-ECT Ham-17 of 26) and 11 healthy subjects were recruited. GABA was quantified using short-TE MRS in prefrontal and occipital cortex. Other neurometabolites such as glutathione (GSH), N-acetylaspartate (NAA) and glutamate (Glu) were secondary outcome measures.

Results: No significant differences in GABA/Cr levels were observed between patients at baseline and healthy subjects in prefrontal cortex, t(20)=0.089, p=0.93 or occipital cortex t(21)=0.37, p=0.72. All patients improved on Ham-17 (mean post-ECT Ham-17 of 9). No significant difference was found in GABA, Glu, glutamine, choline or GSH between pre- and post-ECT values. However, we observed a significant decrease in NAA levels following ECT t(22)=3.89, p=0.0038, and a significant correlation between the NAA decline and the number of ECT sessions p=0.035.

Conclusions: Our study does not support prior studies arguing for GABA as a key factor in the treatment effect of ECT on major depression. The reduction in NAA levels following ECT could be due to neuronal loss or a transient dysfunction in prefrontal cortex. As no long-term follow-up scan was performed, it is unknown whether NAA levels will normalise over time.

电休克治疗前后重性抑郁症患者γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)的磁共振(MR)光谱测定。
目的:已有研究表明,抑制性神经递质γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)的失调参与了重度抑郁症的病理生理过程。我们的目的是阐明皮质GABA含量的变化与抑郁症和电休克治疗(ECT)有关。方法:共招募11例双相情感障碍重性抑郁或抑郁发作患者(ect前平均Ham-17 / 26)和11名健康受试者。采用短te MRS定量测定前额叶和枕叶皮层的GABA。其他神经代谢物如谷胱甘肽(GSH)、n -乙酰天冬氨酸(NAA)和谷氨酸(Glu)是次要指标。结果:基线组患者与健康组患者前额皮质GABA/Cr水平无显著差异,t(20)=0.089, p=0.93;枕皮质t(21)=0.37, p=0.72。所有患者的Ham-17均有改善(ect后Ham-17的平均值为9)。在GABA、Glu、谷氨酰胺、胆碱或GSH方面,ect前和ect后的值无显著差异。然而,我们观察到ECT后NAA水平显著下降(22)=3.89,p=0.0038,并且NAA下降与ECT次数之间存在显著相关性p=0.035。结论:我们的研究不支持先前的研究认为GABA是电痉挛疗法治疗重度抑郁症的关键因素。电痉挛后NAA水平的降低可能是由于神经元丢失或前额皮质的短暂功能障碍。由于没有进行长期随访扫描,因此不知道NAA水平是否会随着时间的推移而正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Acta Neuropsychiatrica NEUROSCIENCES-PSYCHIATRY
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信