Comparative Seroepidemiological Study of Brucellosis in Sheep under Smallholder Farming and Governmental Breeding Ranches of Central and North East Ethiopia.

Journal of veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2018-07-04 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/7239156
Shimeles Abegaz Addis, Andualem Yimer Desalegn
{"title":"Comparative Seroepidemiological Study of Brucellosis in Sheep under Smallholder Farming and Governmental Breeding Ranches of Central and North East Ethiopia.","authors":"Shimeles Abegaz Addis,&nbsp;Andualem Yimer Desalegn","doi":"10.1155/2018/7239156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study was carried out to investigate the status of brucellosis in sheep management under extensive smallholder farming and intensively in governmental breeding ranches in six districts selected from three administrative zones. Using multistage sampling, serum samples of 2409 sheep from 274 flocks were collected and tested using the Rose Bengal Plate Agglutination Test (RBPT) and positive sera were confirmed using a Complement Fixation Test (CFT). Of all animals tested, 4.98% were RBPT positive, and after confirmation with CFT, the overall animal-level prevalence was found to be 4.89% (CI: 3.24-6.9%). Of the flocks sampled, 61 (22.3%, CI: 18.03-29.17%) had at least one animal positive to both tests. Significantly higher (<i>P</i> < 0.001) individual animal seroprevalence of 5.87% (CI: 3.83-7.31%) was found in sheep under smallholder production than in breeding ranches (1.75%, 95% CI: 1.57-3.05%). However, flock level seroprevalence in breeding ranches was found to be 100% (8/8), while in the smallholder production it was 19.92% (CI: 16.4-25.81%). Significantly highest animal-level seroprevalence of 9.55% (CI: 7.91-12.4%) was observed in north Wollo zone's smallholder farms. From the three studied breeding ranches, highest seroprevalence of 3.57% (CI: 2.84%-5.18%) was found in Sheno Agricultural Research Centre. Significantly higher seroprevalence (<i>P</i> < 0.01) was found in aborted sheep and with history of retained fetal membrane in both production systems. All the sheep flocks in the studied breeding ranches were found to be seropositive; hence, this study suggests strict control measures of ovine brucellosis in the breeding reaches, since they could be a source of infection for the smallholder farms.</p>","PeriodicalId":91135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medicine","volume":"2018 ","pages":"7239156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/7239156","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7239156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

This cross-sectional study was carried out to investigate the status of brucellosis in sheep management under extensive smallholder farming and intensively in governmental breeding ranches in six districts selected from three administrative zones. Using multistage sampling, serum samples of 2409 sheep from 274 flocks were collected and tested using the Rose Bengal Plate Agglutination Test (RBPT) and positive sera were confirmed using a Complement Fixation Test (CFT). Of all animals tested, 4.98% were RBPT positive, and after confirmation with CFT, the overall animal-level prevalence was found to be 4.89% (CI: 3.24-6.9%). Of the flocks sampled, 61 (22.3%, CI: 18.03-29.17%) had at least one animal positive to both tests. Significantly higher (P < 0.001) individual animal seroprevalence of 5.87% (CI: 3.83-7.31%) was found in sheep under smallholder production than in breeding ranches (1.75%, 95% CI: 1.57-3.05%). However, flock level seroprevalence in breeding ranches was found to be 100% (8/8), while in the smallholder production it was 19.92% (CI: 16.4-25.81%). Significantly highest animal-level seroprevalence of 9.55% (CI: 7.91-12.4%) was observed in north Wollo zone's smallholder farms. From the three studied breeding ranches, highest seroprevalence of 3.57% (CI: 2.84%-5.18%) was found in Sheno Agricultural Research Centre. Significantly higher seroprevalence (P < 0.01) was found in aborted sheep and with history of retained fetal membrane in both production systems. All the sheep flocks in the studied breeding ranches were found to be seropositive; hence, this study suggests strict control measures of ovine brucellosis in the breeding reaches, since they could be a source of infection for the smallholder farms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

埃塞俄比亚中部和东北部小农与政府牧场绵羊布鲁氏菌病血清流行病学比较研究。
本横断面研究旨在调查从3个行政区中选择的6个县的粗放型小农和集约型政府养殖场的绵羊管理中布鲁氏菌病的状况。采用多级采样法,收集274个羊群2409只羊的血清,采用玫瑰孟加拉板凝集试验(RBPT)检测,补体固定试验(CFT)确认阳性血清。在所有检测的动物中,4.98%为RBPT阳性,经CFT确认,动物水平的总体患病率为4.89% (CI: 3.24-6.9%)。在采集的禽群中,61只(22.3%,CI: 18.03 ~ 29.17%)至少有一只动物对两种检测均呈阳性。小农牧羊个体血清阳性率为5.87% (CI: 3.83 ~ 7.31%),显著高于养殖牧羊(1.75%,95% CI: 1.57 ~ 3.05%) (P < 0.001)。种畜水平血清阳性率为100%(8/8),小农水平血清阳性率为19.92% (CI: 16.4 ~ 25.81%)。在Wollo地区北部的小农养殖场中观察到的动物血清阳性率最高,为9.55% (CI: 7.91-12.4%)。在所研究的3个养殖牧场中,神诺农业研究中心的血清阳性率最高,为3.57% (CI: 2.84% ~ 5.18%)。在两个生产系统中,流产羊和有胎膜保留史的羊血清阳性率均显著高于对照组(P < 0.01)。在所研究的养殖牧场中,所有羊群血清均呈阳性;因此,本研究建议在养殖地区采取严格的控制措施,因为它们可能是小农农场的感染源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信