Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Tafluprost to a Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed Combination in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Pub Date : 2018-06-29 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874364101812010121
Kenji Inoue, Takeaki Ueda, Kyoko Ishida, Goji Tomita
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Tafluprost to a Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed Combination in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.","authors":"Kenji Inoue,&nbsp;Takeaki Ueda,&nbsp;Kyoko Ishida,&nbsp;Goji Tomita","doi":"10.2174/1874364101812010121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed Combination (TTFC) has demonstrated efficacy and safety in reducing Intraocular Pressure (IOP). However, direct comparisons of switching from tafluprost to TTFC are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of switching from tafluprost to TTFC in patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four eyes (34 patients) with POAG that did not achieve adequate IOP reduction on tafluprost were switched to TTFC with no washout period. IOP, systolic/diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate were measured 1 and 3 months later and compared with baseline values. All participants were asked about specific adverse reactions after 1 and 3 months of treatment. Patients also completed a questionnaire about preference and adherence after 1 month of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean IOP after 1 and 3 months was significantly lower than at baseline (14.2 ± 2.1 mmHg and 14.1 ± 2.3 mmHg, respectively, vs 16.0 ± 2.0 mmHg, P < 0.0001). Systolic/diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate were not significantly different from baseline after 1 and 3 months. The questionnaire indicated that the frequency of missing a dose was not different before (27.3%) or after (18.2%) switching to TTFC (P = 0.2371). There were five reports of adverse reactions (14.7%), including a corneal epithelium disorder, ocular irritation, skin irritation at the wrist, and chest pain. Two patients (5.9%) withdrew because of adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switching from tafluprost to TTFC achieved IOP control safely and was well accepted by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":88332,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"12 ","pages":"121-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047199/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed Combination (TTFC) has demonstrated efficacy and safety in reducing Intraocular Pressure (IOP). However, direct comparisons of switching from tafluprost to TTFC are limited.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of switching from tafluprost to TTFC in patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: Thirty-four eyes (34 patients) with POAG that did not achieve adequate IOP reduction on tafluprost were switched to TTFC with no washout period. IOP, systolic/diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate were measured 1 and 3 months later and compared with baseline values. All participants were asked about specific adverse reactions after 1 and 3 months of treatment. Patients also completed a questionnaire about preference and adherence after 1 month of treatment.

Results: Mean IOP after 1 and 3 months was significantly lower than at baseline (14.2 ± 2.1 mmHg and 14.1 ± 2.3 mmHg, respectively, vs 16.0 ± 2.0 mmHg, P < 0.0001). Systolic/diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate were not significantly different from baseline after 1 and 3 months. The questionnaire indicated that the frequency of missing a dose was not different before (27.3%) or after (18.2%) switching to TTFC (P = 0.2371). There were five reports of adverse reactions (14.7%), including a corneal epithelium disorder, ocular irritation, skin irritation at the wrist, and chest pain. Two patients (5.9%) withdrew because of adverse reactions.

Conclusion: Switching from tafluprost to TTFC achieved IOP control safely and was well accepted by patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

原发性开角型青光眼患者从他氟前列素转换为他氟前列素/替莫洛尔固定联合治疗的疗效和安全性
背景:他氟前列素/替洛尔固定联合治疗(TTFC)降低眼压(IOP)的有效性和安全性已得到证实。然而,从他氟前列素到TTFC的直接比较是有限的。目的:探讨他氟前列素替代TTFC治疗原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)的疗效和安全性。方法:34例POAG患者(34例)在他氟前列素治疗下未能达到足够的IOP降低效果,将其切换到TTFC治疗,没有洗脱期。1个月和3个月后测量IOP、收缩压/舒张压和脉搏率,并与基线值进行比较。所有参与者在治疗1个月和3个月后被问及具体的不良反应。患者还在治疗1个月后完成了一份关于偏好和依从性的问卷调查。结果:1个月和3个月后的平均IOP显著低于基线(分别为14.2±2.1 mmHg和14.1±2.3 mmHg, vs 16.0±2.0 mmHg, P < 0.0001)。1个月和3个月后,收缩压/舒张压和脉搏率与基线无显著差异。问卷调查显示,切换到TTFC前(27.3%)和切换到TTFC后(18.2%)漏服一次剂量的频率没有差异(P = 0.2371)。有5例不良反应报告(14.7%),包括角膜上皮病变、眼部刺激、手腕皮肤刺激和胸痛。2例(5.9%)因不良反应退出治疗。结论:从他氟前列素转换为TTFC可安全控制IOP,并为患者所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信