[Comparison of the life quality and recurrence in patients with concealed penis after degloving and root fixation surgery with three different suture material].

中华整形外科杂志 Pub Date : 2016-11-01

Hinshui Mao, Yidong Liu, Yingbin Wang, Xiaojiang Xu, Yanjun Zheng

{"title":"[Comparison of the life quality and recurrence in patients with concealed penis after degloving and root fixation surgery with three different suture material].","authors":"Hinshui Mao, Yidong Liu, Yingbin Wang, Xiaojiang Xu, Yanjun Zheng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the life quality and recurrence in patients with concealed penis after degloving and root fixation surgery with three different suture material.Methods: From March 2011 to April 2015,64 cases with concealed penis were treated by degloving and root fixation with three different suture material, including PDS in 21 cases, Prolene in 23 cases,common absorbable suture in 20 cases. The operative time,intraoperative bleeding, postoperative life quality, recurrence and complication were retrospectively analyzed.Results: There were 14 cases(6 months later) and 7 cases(1 year later) in Prolene group who complained negative effect on their life quality, while none in PDS and common suture groups (both P ＜ 0.05).6 months after operation, recurrence happened in one case in Prolene group,8 cases in common group and none in PDS group (both P ＜ 0.05).There were no significant difference in operative time, bleeding, as well as life quality, recurrence and complication within 3 months between these three groups (all P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions: PDS is suitable for root fixation in patients with concealed penis. Satisfactory result can be achieved without interfere of life quality.","PeriodicalId":69147,"journal":{"name":"中华整形外科杂志","volume":"32 6","pages":"425-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华整形外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the life quality and recurrence in patients with concealed penis after degloving and root fixation surgery with three different suture material.

Methods: From March 2011 to April 2015,64 cases with concealed penis were treated by degloving and root fixation with three different suture material, including PDS in 21 cases, Prolene in 23 cases,common absorbable suture in 20 cases. The operative time,intraoperative bleeding, postoperative life quality, recurrence and complication were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: There were 14 cases(6 months later) and 7 cases(1 year later) in Prolene group who complained negative effect on their life quality, while none in PDS and common suture groups (both P ＜ 0.05).6 months after operation, recurrence happened in one case in Prolene group,8 cases in common group and none in PDS group (both P ＜ 0.05).There were no significant difference in operative time, bleeding, as well as life quality, recurrence and complication within 3 months between these three groups (all P ＞ 0.05).

Conclusions: PDS is suitable for root fixation in patients with concealed penis. Satisfactory result can be achieved without interfere of life quality.

本刊更多论文

[三种不同缝线材料隐匿阴茎脱手套根固定术后患者生活质量及复发的比较]。

目的:比较三种不同缝线材料对隐匿阴茎脱手套根固定术后患者的生活质量和复发率的影响。方法:2011年3月至2015年4月，对64例隐匿性阴茎采用3种不同缝线材料进行脱套固定，其中PDS缝线21例，Prolene缝线23例，普通可吸收缝线20例。回顾性分析手术时间、术中出血、术后生活质量、复发及并发症。结果:Prolene组有14例(6个月后)和7例(1年后)对生活质量产生负面影响，PDS组和普通缝合组无不良反应(P均< 0.05)。术后6个月，Prolene组复发1例，普通组8例，PDS组无复发(均P < 0.05)。三组患者手术时间、出血量、生活质量、3个月内复发率及并发症比较，差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:PDS是治疗隐蔽性阴茎的有效方法。在不影响生活质量的前提下，达到满意的效果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

中华整形外科杂志

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

5346