Investigating cell type specific mechanisms contributing to acute oral toxicity.

ALTEX Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-12 DOI:10.14573/altex.1805181
Pilar Prieto, Rabea Graepel, Kirsten Gerloff, Lara Lamon, Magdalini Sachana, Francesca Pistollato, Laura Gribaldo, Anna Bal-Price, Andrew Worth
{"title":"Investigating cell type specific mechanisms contributing to acute oral toxicity.","authors":"Pilar Prieto,&nbsp;Rabea Graepel,&nbsp;Kirsten Gerloff,&nbsp;Lara Lamon,&nbsp;Magdalini Sachana,&nbsp;Francesca Pistollato,&nbsp;Laura Gribaldo,&nbsp;Anna Bal-Price,&nbsp;Andrew Worth","doi":"10.14573/altex.1805181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The replacement of animals in acute systemic toxicity testing remains a considerable challenge. Only animal data are currently accepted by regulators, including data generated by reduction and refinement methods. The development of Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) is hampered by an insufficient understanding of the numerous toxicity pathways that lead to acute systemic toxicity. Therefore, central to our work has been the collection and evaluation of the mechanistic information on eight organs identified as relevant for acute systemic toxicity (nervous system, cardiovascular system, liver, kidney, lung, blood, gastrointestinal system and immune system). While the nervous and cardiovascular systems are the most frequent targets, no clear relationship emerged between specific mechanisms of target organ toxicity and the level (category) of toxicity. From a list of 114 chemicals with acute oral in vivo and in vitro data, 98 were identified with target organ specific effects, of which 93% were predicted as acutely toxic by the 3T3 neutral red uptake cytotoxicity assay and 6% as non-toxic. This analysis will help to prioritise the development of adverse outcome pathways for acute oral toxicity, which will support the assessment of chemicals using mechanistically informed IATA.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":"39-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1805181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The replacement of animals in acute systemic toxicity testing remains a considerable challenge. Only animal data are currently accepted by regulators, including data generated by reduction and refinement methods. The development of Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) is hampered by an insufficient understanding of the numerous toxicity pathways that lead to acute systemic toxicity. Therefore, central to our work has been the collection and evaluation of the mechanistic information on eight organs identified as relevant for acute systemic toxicity (nervous system, cardiovascular system, liver, kidney, lung, blood, gastrointestinal system and immune system). While the nervous and cardiovascular systems are the most frequent targets, no clear relationship emerged between specific mechanisms of target organ toxicity and the level (category) of toxicity. From a list of 114 chemicals with acute oral in vivo and in vitro data, 98 were identified with target organ specific effects, of which 93% were predicted as acutely toxic by the 3T3 neutral red uptake cytotoxicity assay and 6% as non-toxic. This analysis will help to prioritise the development of adverse outcome pathways for acute oral toxicity, which will support the assessment of chemicals using mechanistically informed IATA.

研究导致急性口腔毒性的细胞类型特异性机制。
在急性全身毒性试验中替代动物仍然是一个相当大的挑战。目前只有动物数据被监管机构接受,包括通过还原和细化方法产生的数据。综合测试和评估方法(IATA)的发展受到对导致急性全身毒性的众多毒性途径了解不足的阻碍。因此,我们工作的核心是收集和评估与急性全身毒性相关的八个器官(神经系统、心血管系统、肝、肾、肺、血液、胃肠道系统和免疫系统)的机制信息。虽然神经和心血管系统是最常见的靶点,但靶器官毒性的具体机制与毒性水平(类别)之间没有明确的关系。在114种具有体内和体外急性口服数据的化学物质中,98种被确定具有靶器官特异性作用,其中93%被3T3中性红色摄取细胞毒性试验预测为急性毒性,6%为无毒。这一分析将有助于优先开发急性口服毒性的不良后果途径,这将支持使用IATA的机械信息对化学品进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信