{"title":"Optimizing the Magnetic Dipole-Field Source for Magnetically Guided Cochlear-Implant Electrode-Array Insertions.","authors":"Lisandro Leon, Frank M Warren, Jake J Abbott","doi":"10.1142/S2424905X18500046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnetic guidance of cochlear-implant electrode arrays during insertion has been demonstrated <i>in vitro</i> to reduce insertion forces, which is believed to be correlated to a reduction in trauma. In those prior studies, the magnetic dipole-field source (MDS) was configured to travel on a path that would be coincident with the cochlea's modiolar axis, which was an unnecessary constraint that was useful to demonstrate feasibility. In this paper, we determine the optimal configuration (size and location) of a spherical-permanent-magnet MDS needed to accomplish guided insertions with a 100 mT field strength required at the cochlea, and we provide a methodology to perform such an optimization more generally. Based on computed-tomography scans of 30 human subjects, the MDS should be lateral-to and slightly anterior-to the cochlea with an approximate radius (mean and standard deviation across subjects) of 64 mm and 4.5 mm, respectively. We compare these results to the modiolar configuration and find that the volume of the MDS can be reduced by a factor of five with a 43% reduction in its radius by moving it to the optimal location. We conservatively estimate that the magnetic forces generated by the optimal configuration are two orders of magnitude below the threshold needed to puncture the basilar membrane. Although subject-specific optimal configurations are computed in this paper, a one-size-fits-all version with a radius of approximately 75 mm is more robust to registration error and likely more practical. Finally, we explain how to translate the results obtained to an electromagnetic MDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":73821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical robotics research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S2424905X18500046","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical robotics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424905X18500046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Magnetic guidance of cochlear-implant electrode arrays during insertion has been demonstrated in vitro to reduce insertion forces, which is believed to be correlated to a reduction in trauma. In those prior studies, the magnetic dipole-field source (MDS) was configured to travel on a path that would be coincident with the cochlea's modiolar axis, which was an unnecessary constraint that was useful to demonstrate feasibility. In this paper, we determine the optimal configuration (size and location) of a spherical-permanent-magnet MDS needed to accomplish guided insertions with a 100 mT field strength required at the cochlea, and we provide a methodology to perform such an optimization more generally. Based on computed-tomography scans of 30 human subjects, the MDS should be lateral-to and slightly anterior-to the cochlea with an approximate radius (mean and standard deviation across subjects) of 64 mm and 4.5 mm, respectively. We compare these results to the modiolar configuration and find that the volume of the MDS can be reduced by a factor of five with a 43% reduction in its radius by moving it to the optimal location. We conservatively estimate that the magnetic forces generated by the optimal configuration are two orders of magnitude below the threshold needed to puncture the basilar membrane. Although subject-specific optimal configurations are computed in this paper, a one-size-fits-all version with a radius of approximately 75 mm is more robust to registration error and likely more practical. Finally, we explain how to translate the results obtained to an electromagnetic MDS.