Diagnostics as Prevention - A Rapid Testing-Based Strategy of Sex Workers against Sexual HIV Exposure.

European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology Pub Date : 2018-05-05 eCollection Date: 2018-06-25 DOI:10.1556/1886.2018.00007
Andreas Hahn, Rebecca Hinz, Thomas Meyer, Ulrike Loderstädt, Ottmar Herchenröder, Christian G Meyer, Norbert Georg Schwarz, Hagen Frickmann
{"title":"Diagnostics as Prevention - A Rapid Testing-Based Strategy of Sex Workers against Sexual HIV Exposure.","authors":"Andreas Hahn,&nbsp;Rebecca Hinz,&nbsp;Thomas Meyer,&nbsp;Ulrike Loderstädt,&nbsp;Ottmar Herchenröder,&nbsp;Christian G Meyer,&nbsp;Norbert Georg Schwarz,&nbsp;Hagen Frickmann","doi":"10.1556/1886.2018.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>German sex workers have illegally established a prevention strategy, which consists of testing potential sexual partners with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) prior to engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse eventually performed in case of a negative test result. Based on a recently established modeling approach, the effectiveness of this strategy regarding the risk of HIV exposure was compared with protection provided by condom use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a literature search, the following assumptions were used for the calculations: an averaged 80% exposure risk reduction with a condom used during sexual intercourse, usage of a well-characterized 4th-generation HIV RDT, and a 10 day post-infection period without any measurable viral load in peripheral blood followed by a sero-conversion period of about 3 weeks with 12.3% test sensitivity (antigen-specific) and only afterwards 97.3% (antibody-specific) test sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In most constellations, the HIV exposure risk in case of RDT-based prevention was lower than with condom use. Conclusions: The RDT-based HIV exposure prevention as established by sex workers is effective in most situations. A notable weakness of the strategy is the RDTs' poor sensitivity in spite of a high transmission risk during the seroconversion stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11929,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","volume":"8 2","pages":"47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1886.2018.00007","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2018.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: German sex workers have illegally established a prevention strategy, which consists of testing potential sexual partners with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) prior to engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse eventually performed in case of a negative test result. Based on a recently established modeling approach, the effectiveness of this strategy regarding the risk of HIV exposure was compared with protection provided by condom use.

Methods: Based on a literature search, the following assumptions were used for the calculations: an averaged 80% exposure risk reduction with a condom used during sexual intercourse, usage of a well-characterized 4th-generation HIV RDT, and a 10 day post-infection period without any measurable viral load in peripheral blood followed by a sero-conversion period of about 3 weeks with 12.3% test sensitivity (antigen-specific) and only afterwards 97.3% (antibody-specific) test sensitivity.

Results: In most constellations, the HIV exposure risk in case of RDT-based prevention was lower than with condom use. Conclusions: The RDT-based HIV exposure prevention as established by sex workers is effective in most situations. A notable weakness of the strategy is the RDTs' poor sensitivity in spite of a high transmission risk during the seroconversion stage.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

诊断即预防——性工作者对抗性艾滋病毒暴露的快速检测策略。
导言:德国性工作者非法制定了一项预防战略,其中包括在进行无保护的性交之前对潜在的性伴侣进行人类免疫缺陷病毒(艾滋病毒)特异性快速诊断测试(RDTs),最终在测试结果为阴性的情况下进行。基于最近建立的建模方法,将这一策略在艾滋病毒暴露风险方面的有效性与使用避孕套提供的保护进行了比较。方法:基于文献检索,使用以下假设进行计算:性交时使用安全套平均降低80%的暴露风险,使用特征明确的第四代HIV RDT,感染后10天,外周血中没有任何可测量的病毒载量,随后的血清转换期约为3周,测试敏感性为12.3%(抗原特异性),仅在97.3%(抗体特异性)测试敏感性之后。结果:在大多数星座中,基于rdt预防的HIV暴露风险低于使用避孕套。结论:性工作者建立的基于rdt的HIV暴露预防在大多数情况下是有效的。该策略的一个显著弱点是,尽管在血清转化阶段传播风险很高,但rdt的敏感性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信