Cognitive ability and math computation developmental relations with math problem solving: An integrated, multigroup approach.

Ethan F Villeneuve, Daniel B Hajovsky, Benjamin A Mason, Brittany M Lewno
{"title":"Cognitive ability and math computation developmental relations with math problem solving: An integrated, multigroup approach.","authors":"Ethan F Villeneuve,&nbsp;Daniel B Hajovsky,&nbsp;Benjamin A Mason,&nbsp;Brittany M Lewno","doi":"10.1037/spq0000267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individual differences in Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities are related to individual differences in math problem solving. However, it is less clear whether cognitive abilities are associated with math problem solving directly or indirectly via math component skills and whether these relations differ across grade levels. We used multigroup structural equation models to examine direct and indirect CHC-based cognitive ability relations with math problem solving across six grade-level groups using the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition and the Kaufman Tests of Educational Achievement, Second Edition co-normed standardization sample data (<i>N</i> = 2,117). After testing factorial invariance of the cognitive constructs across grade levels, we assessed whether the main findings were similar across higher-order and bifactor models. In the higher-order model, the Crystallized Ability, Visual Processing, and Short-Term Memory constucts had direct and indirect relations with math problem solving, whereas the Learning Efficiency and Retrieval Fluency constructs had only indirect relations with math problem solving via math computation. The integrated cognitive ability and math achievement relations were generally consistent across the CHC models of intelligence. In the higher-order model, the g factor operated indirectly on math computation and math problem solving, whereas in the bifactor model, the first-order <i>G</i> factor had direct relations with math computation and math problem solving. In both models, <i>g/G</i> was the most consistent and largest cognitive predictor of math skills. Last, the relation of math computation with math problem solving increased as grade level increased. Theoretical implications for math development and considerations for school psychologists are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":88124,"journal":{"name":"School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association","volume":"34 1","pages":"96-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Individual differences in Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities are related to individual differences in math problem solving. However, it is less clear whether cognitive abilities are associated with math problem solving directly or indirectly via math component skills and whether these relations differ across grade levels. We used multigroup structural equation models to examine direct and indirect CHC-based cognitive ability relations with math problem solving across six grade-level groups using the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition and the Kaufman Tests of Educational Achievement, Second Edition co-normed standardization sample data (N = 2,117). After testing factorial invariance of the cognitive constructs across grade levels, we assessed whether the main findings were similar across higher-order and bifactor models. In the higher-order model, the Crystallized Ability, Visual Processing, and Short-Term Memory constucts had direct and indirect relations with math problem solving, whereas the Learning Efficiency and Retrieval Fluency constructs had only indirect relations with math problem solving via math computation. The integrated cognitive ability and math achievement relations were generally consistent across the CHC models of intelligence. In the higher-order model, the g factor operated indirectly on math computation and math problem solving, whereas in the bifactor model, the first-order G factor had direct relations with math computation and math problem solving. In both models, g/G was the most consistent and largest cognitive predictor of math skills. Last, the relation of math computation with math problem solving increased as grade level increased. Theoretical implications for math development and considerations for school psychologists are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

认知能力和数学计算发展与数学问题解决的关系:一个综合的、多组的方法。
Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC)认知能力的个体差异与数学问题解决的个体差异有关。然而,认知能力是否通过数学组成技能直接或间接地与数学问题解决有关,以及这些关系是否因年级而异,目前尚不清楚。我们采用多组结构方程模型,利用考夫曼儿童评估单元(第二版)和考夫曼教育成就测试(第二版)共规范标准化样本数据(N = 2,117),在六个年级水平组中检验基于chc的认知能力与数学问题解决的直接和间接关系。在测试了不同年级认知结构的因子不变性后,我们评估了高阶模型和双因素模型的主要发现是否相似。在高阶模型中,结晶能力、视觉加工和短期记忆构念与数学问题解决有直接和间接的关系,而学习效率和检索流畅性构念与通过数学计算解决数学问题只有间接的关系。综合认知能力与数学成绩的关系在各智力模型中基本一致。在高阶模型中,g因子间接作用于数学计算和数学问题解决,而在双因子模型中,一阶g因子直接作用于数学计算和数学问题解决。在这两个模型中,g/ g是最一致和最大的数学技能认知预测因子。最后,数学计算与数学问题解决的关系随着年级的增加而增加。讨论了数学发展的理论含义和学校心理学家的考虑。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2019 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信