Exploring construct validity of clinical staging in schizophrenia spectrum disorders in an acute psychiatric ward.

Q4 Medicine
Steven Berendsen, Jasper van der Paardt, Marion van Bruggen, Hans Nusselder, Margje Jalink, Jaap Peen, Henricus Van, Jack Dekker, Lieuwe de Haan
{"title":"Exploring construct validity of clinical staging in schizophrenia spectrum disorders in an acute psychiatric ward.","authors":"Steven Berendsen, Jasper van der Paardt, Marion van Bruggen, Hans Nusselder, Margje Jalink, Jaap Peen, Henricus Van, Jack Dekker, Lieuwe de Haan","doi":"10.3371/CSRP.BEPA.061518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>clinical staging and profiling of schizophrenia spectrum disorders has been proposed to describe and define the heterogenous course of disease. We examined the construct validity of clinical staging in schizophrenia spectrum disorders by measuring differences in distribution and severity of relevant clinical profilers and therapeutic improvement (HoNOS) across clinical stages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>we performed a prospective cross-sectional study with 258 inpatiënts who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, recruited in an acute ward of a psychiatric hospital from 1-1-2015 until 31-12-2016. All patients (N=258) were assigned to a clinical stage, according to the criteria described by McGorry and clinical profilers were determined. Therapeutic improvement was assessed by measuring change in differences in HoNOS score during admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>significant higher severity scores of clinical profilers were found in more advanced stages compared to earlier stages. This pattern was apparent in the clinical profilers negative symptoms (F=4.56, P<0.01), number of psychotic episodes last year (F=13.65, P<0.01), compliance (F=2.76, P<0.05), work and daily activities (F=9.85, P<0.001), living situation (F=3.71, P<0.05), support of close relatives (F=9.38, P<0.001) and pre-morbid functioning (F=7.33, P<0.001). Judicial background was less prevalent in earlier stages compared to more advanced disease stages. No differences in therapeutic improvement (HoNOS) were found between clinical stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>this study demonstrates that clinical staging in schizophrenia spectrum disorders has an acceptable construct validity between earlier and more chronic stages of disease. Several clinical profilers increase in more advanced stages compared to earlier clinical stages, which supports construct validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":40019,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.BEPA.061518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: clinical staging and profiling of schizophrenia spectrum disorders has been proposed to describe and define the heterogenous course of disease. We examined the construct validity of clinical staging in schizophrenia spectrum disorders by measuring differences in distribution and severity of relevant clinical profilers and therapeutic improvement (HoNOS) across clinical stages.

Methods: we performed a prospective cross-sectional study with 258 inpatiënts who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, recruited in an acute ward of a psychiatric hospital from 1-1-2015 until 31-12-2016. All patients (N=258) were assigned to a clinical stage, according to the criteria described by McGorry and clinical profilers were determined. Therapeutic improvement was assessed by measuring change in differences in HoNOS score during admission.

Results: significant higher severity scores of clinical profilers were found in more advanced stages compared to earlier stages. This pattern was apparent in the clinical profilers negative symptoms (F=4.56, P<0.01), number of psychotic episodes last year (F=13.65, P<0.01), compliance (F=2.76, P<0.05), work and daily activities (F=9.85, P<0.001), living situation (F=3.71, P<0.05), support of close relatives (F=9.38, P<0.001) and pre-morbid functioning (F=7.33, P<0.001). Judicial background was less prevalent in earlier stages compared to more advanced disease stages. No differences in therapeutic improvement (HoNOS) were found between clinical stages.

Conclusion: this study demonstrates that clinical staging in schizophrenia spectrum disorders has an acceptable construct validity between earlier and more chronic stages of disease. Several clinical profilers increase in more advanced stages compared to earlier clinical stages, which supports construct validity.

探索急性精神病病房精神分裂症谱系障碍临床分期的构建有效性。
目的:有人提出对精神分裂症谱系障碍进行临床分期和特征分析,以描述和定义疾病的异质性病程。方法:我们对符合DSM-IV精神分裂症谱系障碍标准的258名住院患者进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,这些患者于2015年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间在一家精神病医院的急诊病房接受治疗。所有患者(N=258)均根据麦戈瑞描述的标准被分配到一个临床阶段,并确定了临床特征。通过测量入院期间HoNOS评分差异的变化来评估治疗改善情况。结果:与早期阶段相比,晚期阶段的临床特征评分严重程度明显更高。结论:本研究表明,精神分裂症谱系障碍的临床分期在疾病的早期和慢性期之间具有可接受的建构效度。与早期临床分期相比,晚期临床分期的几项临床侧写会有所增加,这支持了建构有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The vision of the exciting new peer-reviewed quarterly publication Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses (CS) is to provide psychiatrists and other healthcare professionals with the latest research and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia and related psychoses. CS is a practice-oriented publication focused exclusively on the newest research findings, guidelines, treatment protocols, and clinical trials relevant to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信