Clocks to Computers: Some Clarifications.

IF 1 2区哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Isis Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1086/689796

Frans van Lunteren

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This final comment aims to dispel legitimate concerns expressed in some of the commentaries about the nature of the successive epistemic regimes inherent in the“big picture” offered in “Clocks to Computers” and the use of machines as emblems for these regimes. It also addresses the place in the proposed scheme of some key figures in the history of science that do not obviously fit these regimes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

时钟到电脑:一些澄清。

这最后的评论旨在消除一些评论中表达的合理担忧，这些评论涉及“从时钟到计算机”所提供的“大图景”中固有的连续认知制度的性质，以及使用机器作为这些制度的象征。它还讨论了科学史上一些关键人物在拟议方案中的地位，这些人物显然不符合这些制度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Isis 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

16.70%

发文量

150

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Since its inception in 1912, Isis has featured scholarly articles, research notes, and commentary on the history of science, medicine, and technology and their cultural influences. Review essays and book reviews on new contributions to the discipline are also included. An official publication of the History of Science Society, Isis is the oldest English-language journal in the field. The Press, along with the journal’s editorial office in Starkville, MS, would like to acknowledge the following supporters: Mississippi State University, its College of Arts and Sciences and History Department, and the Consortium for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine.