New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2015-05-01 Epub Date: 2014-11-13 DOI:10.1177/0146621614554650
Mehmet Kaplan, Jimmy de la Torre, Juan Ramón Barrada
{"title":"New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing.","authors":"Mehmet Kaplan,&nbsp;Jimmy de la Torre,&nbsp;Juan Ramón Barrada","doi":"10.1177/0146621614554650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article introduces two new item selection methods, the modified posterior-weighted Kullback-Leibler index (MPWKL) and the generalized deterministic inputs, noisy \"and\" gate (G-DINA) model discrimination index (GDI), that can be used in cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing. The efficiency of the new methods is compared with the posterior-weighted Kullback-Leibler (PWKL) item selection index using a simulation study in the context of the G-DINA model. The impact of item quality, generating models, and test termination rules on attribute classification accuracy or test length is also investigated. The results of the study show that the MPWKL and GDI perform very similarly, and have higher correct attribute classification rates or shorter mean test lengths compared with the PWKL. In addition, the GDI has the shortest implementation time among the three indices. The proportion of item usage with respect to the required attributes across the different conditions is also tracked and discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":"39 3","pages":"167-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0146621614554650","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621614554650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

This article introduces two new item selection methods, the modified posterior-weighted Kullback-Leibler index (MPWKL) and the generalized deterministic inputs, noisy "and" gate (G-DINA) model discrimination index (GDI), that can be used in cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing. The efficiency of the new methods is compared with the posterior-weighted Kullback-Leibler (PWKL) item selection index using a simulation study in the context of the G-DINA model. The impact of item quality, generating models, and test termination rules on attribute classification accuracy or test length is also investigated. The results of the study show that the MPWKL and GDI perform very similarly, and have higher correct attribute classification rates or shorter mean test lengths compared with the PWKL. In addition, the GDI has the shortest implementation time among the three indices. The proportion of item usage with respect to the required attributes across the different conditions is also tracked and discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

认知诊断计算机自适应测试的新选题方法。
本文介绍了两种新的可用于认知诊断计算机化自适应测试的项目选择方法,即改进后验加权Kullback-Leibler指数(MPWKL)和广义确定性输入噪声门(G-DINA)模型判别指数(GDI)。通过G-DINA模型的仿真研究,将新方法的效率与后置加权Kullback-Leibler (PWKL)项目选择指数进行了比较。研究了项目质量、生成模型和测试终止规则对属性分类精度或测试长度的影响。研究结果表明,MPWKL和GDI的性能非常相似,并且与PWKL相比具有更高的正确属性分类率和更短的平均测试长度。此外,GDI在三个指标中实施时间最短。还跟踪和讨论了不同条件下所需属性的项目使用比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信