A Residual-Based Approach to Validate Q-Matrix Specifications.

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2017-06-01 Epub Date: 2017-01-23 DOI:10.1177/0146621616686021
Jinsong Chen
{"title":"A Residual-Based Approach to Validate Q-Matrix Specifications.","authors":"Jinsong Chen","doi":"10.1177/0146621616686021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Q-matrix validation is of increasing concern due to the significance and subjective tendency of Q-matrix construction in the modeling process. This research proposes a residual-based approach to empirically validate Q-matrix specification based on a combination of fit measures. The approach separates Q-matrix validation into four logical steps, including the test-level evaluation, possible distinction between attribute-level and item-level misspecifications, identification of the hit item, and fit information to aid in item adjustment. Through simulation studies and real-life examples, it is shown that the misspecified items can be detected as the hit item and adjusted sequentially when the misspecification occurs at the item level or at random. Adjustment can be based on the maximum reduction of the test-level measures. When adjustment of individual items tends to be useless, attribute-level misspecification is of concern. The approach can accommodate a variety of cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) and be extended to cover other response formats.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":"41 4","pages":"277-293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0146621616686021","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616686021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Q-matrix validation is of increasing concern due to the significance and subjective tendency of Q-matrix construction in the modeling process. This research proposes a residual-based approach to empirically validate Q-matrix specification based on a combination of fit measures. The approach separates Q-matrix validation into four logical steps, including the test-level evaluation, possible distinction between attribute-level and item-level misspecifications, identification of the hit item, and fit information to aid in item adjustment. Through simulation studies and real-life examples, it is shown that the misspecified items can be detected as the hit item and adjusted sequentially when the misspecification occurs at the item level or at random. Adjustment can be based on the maximum reduction of the test-level measures. When adjustment of individual items tends to be useless, attribute-level misspecification is of concern. The approach can accommodate a variety of cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) and be extended to cover other response formats.

Abstract Image

基于残差的q -矩阵规范验证方法。
由于q矩阵构造在建模过程中的重要性和主观倾向,q矩阵验证越来越受到关注。本研究提出了一种基于残差的方法来经验验证基于拟合措施组合的q矩阵规范。该方法将q矩阵验证分为四个逻辑步骤,包括测试级评估、属性级和项目级错误说明之间的可能区别、识别hit项目以及帮助项目调整的拟合信息。通过仿真研究和实际实例表明,当错标发生在项目层面或随机发生时,错标项目可以被检测为命中项目并进行顺序调整。调整可以基于最大限度地减少测试级措施。当对单个项目的调整趋于无用时,就需要关注属性级别的错误说明。该方法可以适应多种认知诊断模型(CDMs),并可以扩展到涵盖其他响应格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信