Evaluation of second step on early elementary students' academic outcomes: A randomized controlled trial.

Clayton R Cook, Sabina Low, Joanne Buntain-Ricklefs, Kelly Whitaker, Michael D Pullmann, Jaclyn Lally
{"title":"Evaluation of second step on early elementary students' academic outcomes: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Clayton R Cook,&nbsp;Sabina Low,&nbsp;Joanne Buntain-Ricklefs,&nbsp;Kelly Whitaker,&nbsp;Michael D Pullmann,&nbsp;Jaclyn Lally","doi":"10.1037/spq0000233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has consistently linked social-emotional learning to important educational and life outcomes. Early elementary represents an opportune developmental period to proactively support children to acquire social-emotional skills that enable academic success. Using data from a large scale randomized controlled trial, the purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the 4th edition of Second Step on early elementary students' academic-related outcomes. Participants were Kindergarten to 2nd grade students in 61 schools (310 teachers; 7,419 students) across six school districts in Washington State and Arizona. Multilevel models (Time × Condition) indicated the program had no positive main effect impact on academic outcomes. However, moderator analyses revealed that quality of implementation, specifically a measure of student engagement and dosage, was found to be associated with significant, albeit small, reading and classroom behavior outcomes. Findings from this study provide support for Second Step when implemented in the context of high engagement and higher dosage to have small but potentially meaningful collateral impact on early academic-related outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":88124,"journal":{"name":"School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association","volume":"33 4","pages":"561-572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Research has consistently linked social-emotional learning to important educational and life outcomes. Early elementary represents an opportune developmental period to proactively support children to acquire social-emotional skills that enable academic success. Using data from a large scale randomized controlled trial, the purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the 4th edition of Second Step on early elementary students' academic-related outcomes. Participants were Kindergarten to 2nd grade students in 61 schools (310 teachers; 7,419 students) across six school districts in Washington State and Arizona. Multilevel models (Time × Condition) indicated the program had no positive main effect impact on academic outcomes. However, moderator analyses revealed that quality of implementation, specifically a measure of student engagement and dosage, was found to be associated with significant, albeit small, reading and classroom behavior outcomes. Findings from this study provide support for Second Step when implemented in the context of high engagement and higher dosage to have small but potentially meaningful collateral impact on early academic-related outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

小学初中生学业成绩第二步评价:随机对照试验。
研究一直将社交情感学习与重要的教育和生活成果联系起来。小学早期是积极支持儿童获得社会情感技能以促进学业成功的适当发展时期。本研究采用大规模随机对照试验资料,探讨第4版《第二步》对小学生学业相关结果的影响。研究对象为61所学校的幼稚园至二年级学生(310名教师;7419名学生)分布在华盛顿州和亚利桑那州的6个学区。多水平模型(时间×条件)表明该计划对学业成绩没有正向主效应影响。然而,调节分析显示,实施的质量,特别是学生参与和剂量的衡量,被发现与阅读和课堂行为的结果有显著的联系,尽管很小。本研究的结果为第二步提供了支持,当在高参与度和高剂量的背景下实施时,对早期学术相关结果产生小但潜在有意义的附带影响。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2018 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信