Anaerobic Bacterial Response to Nitrosative Stress.

2区 生物学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Advances in Microbial Physiology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-03-15 DOI:10.1016/bs.ampbs.2018.01.001
Jeffrey A Cole
{"title":"Anaerobic Bacterial Response to Nitrosative Stress.","authors":"Jeffrey A Cole","doi":"10.1016/bs.ampbs.2018.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This chapter provides an overview of current knowledge of how anaerobic bacteria protect themselves against nitrosative stress. Nitric oxide (NO) is the primary source of this stress. Aerobically its removal is an oxidative process, whereas reduction is required anaerobically. Mechanisms required to protect aerobic and anaerobic bacteria are therefore different. Several themes recur in the review. First, how gene expression is regulated often provides clues to the physiological function of the gene products. Second, the physiological significance of reports based upon experiments under extreme conditions that bacteria do not encounter in their natural environment requires reassessment. Third, responses to the primary source of stress need to be distinguished from secondary consequences of chemical damage due to failure of repair mechanisms to cope with extreme conditions. NO is generated by many mechanisms, some of which remain undefined. An example is the recent demonstration that the hybrid cluster protein combines with YtfE (or RIC protein, for repair of iron centres damaged by nitrosative stress) in a new pathway to repair key iron-sulphur proteins damaged by nitrosative stress. The functions of many genes expressed in response to nitrosative stress remain either controversial or are completely unknown. The concentration of NO that accumulates in the bacterial cytoplasm is essentially unknown, so dogmatic statements cannot be made that damage to transcription factors (Fur, FNR, SoxRS, MelR, OxyR) occurs naturally as part of a physiologically relevant signalling mechanism. Such doubts can be resolved by simple experiments to meet six proposed criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":50953,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Microbial Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/bs.ampbs.2018.01.001","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Microbial Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ampbs.2018.01.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of current knowledge of how anaerobic bacteria protect themselves against nitrosative stress. Nitric oxide (NO) is the primary source of this stress. Aerobically its removal is an oxidative process, whereas reduction is required anaerobically. Mechanisms required to protect aerobic and anaerobic bacteria are therefore different. Several themes recur in the review. First, how gene expression is regulated often provides clues to the physiological function of the gene products. Second, the physiological significance of reports based upon experiments under extreme conditions that bacteria do not encounter in their natural environment requires reassessment. Third, responses to the primary source of stress need to be distinguished from secondary consequences of chemical damage due to failure of repair mechanisms to cope with extreme conditions. NO is generated by many mechanisms, some of which remain undefined. An example is the recent demonstration that the hybrid cluster protein combines with YtfE (or RIC protein, for repair of iron centres damaged by nitrosative stress) in a new pathway to repair key iron-sulphur proteins damaged by nitrosative stress. The functions of many genes expressed in response to nitrosative stress remain either controversial or are completely unknown. The concentration of NO that accumulates in the bacterial cytoplasm is essentially unknown, so dogmatic statements cannot be made that damage to transcription factors (Fur, FNR, SoxRS, MelR, OxyR) occurs naturally as part of a physiologically relevant signalling mechanism. Such doubts can be resolved by simple experiments to meet six proposed criteria.

厌氧细菌对亚硝化应激的反应。
本章概述了目前厌氧菌如何保护自己免受亚硝化应激的知识。一氧化氮(NO)是这种应激的主要来源。它的去除是一个氧化过程,而还原是一个厌氧过程。因此,保护好氧细菌和厌氧细菌所需的机制是不同的。几个主题在评论中反复出现。首先,基因表达如何被调控通常为基因产物的生理功能提供线索。其次,细菌在自然环境中不会遇到的极端条件下的实验报告的生理意义需要重新评估。第三,对主要压力源的反应需要与由于修复机制失败而导致的化学损伤的次要后果区分开来,以应对极端条件。一氧化氮是由许多机制产生的,其中一些机制仍未确定。最近的一个例子是,杂交簇蛋白与YtfE(或RIC蛋白,用于修复被亚硝化胁迫损伤的铁中心)结合,形成了一条修复被亚硝化胁迫损伤的关键铁硫蛋白的新途径。许多在亚硝化应激反应中表达的基因的功能仍然存在争议或完全未知。细菌细胞质中积累的NO浓度基本上是未知的,因此不能武断地说转录因子(Fur, FNR, SoxRS, MelR, OxyR)的损伤是作为生理相关信号机制的一部分自然发生的。这些疑问可以通过简单的实验来解决,以满足六个建议的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Microbial Physiology
Advances in Microbial Physiology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Advances in Microbial Physiology publishes topical and important reviews, interpreting physiology to include all material that contributes to our understanding of how microorganisms and their component parts work. First published in 1967, the editors have always striven to interpret microbial physiology in the broadest context and have never restricted the contents to traditional views of whole cell physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信