Validation of a Piezoelectric Sensor Array-Based Device for Measurement of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity: The Philips Prototype.

IF 7.3 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Pulse Pub Date : 2018-03-01 Epub Date: 2018-02-08 DOI:10.1159/000486317
Shao-Kun Xu, Xiang-Fei Hong, Yi-Bang Cheng, Chang-Yuan Liu, Yan Li, Bin Yin, Ji-Guang Wang
{"title":"Validation of a Piezoelectric Sensor Array-Based Device for Measurement of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity: The Philips Prototype.","authors":"Shao-Kun Xu,&nbsp;Xiang-Fei Hong,&nbsp;Yi-Bang Cheng,&nbsp;Chang-Yuan Liu,&nbsp;Yan Li,&nbsp;Bin Yin,&nbsp;Ji-Guang Wang","doi":"10.1159/000486317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple piezoelectric pressure mechanotransducers topologized into an array might improve efficiency and accuracy in collecting arterial pressure waveforms for measurement of pulse wave velocity (PWV).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the present study, we validated a piezoelectric sensor array-based prototype (Philips) against the validated and clinically widely used Complior device (Alam Medical).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 33 subjects with a wide distribution of PWV. For the validation, PWV was measured sequentially with the Complior device (four times) and the Philips prototype (three times). With the 99 paired PWV values, we investigated the agreement between the Philips prototype and the Complior device using Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plot. We also performed analysis on the determinants and reproducibility of PWV measured with both devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The correlation coefficient for PWV measured with the two devices was 0.92 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Compared with the Complior device, the Philips prototype slightly overestimated PWV by 0.24 (± 2 standard deviations, ± 1.91) m/s, especially when PWV was high. The correlation coefficient between the difference and the average of the Philips and Complior measurements was 0.21 (<i>p</i> = 0.035). Nonetheless, they had similar determinants. Age, mean arterial pressure, and sex altogether explained 81.6 and 83.9% of the variance of PWV values measured with the Philips prototype and Complior device, respectively. When the two extremes of the three PWV values measured with the Philips prototype and the Complior device were investigated, the coefficients of variation were 8.26 and 3.26%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the Complior device, the Philips prototype had similar accuracy, determinants, and reproducibility in measuring PWV.</p>","PeriodicalId":29774,"journal":{"name":"Pulse","volume":"5 1-4","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000486317","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000486317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Multiple piezoelectric pressure mechanotransducers topologized into an array might improve efficiency and accuracy in collecting arterial pressure waveforms for measurement of pulse wave velocity (PWV).

Objective: In the present study, we validated a piezoelectric sensor array-based prototype (Philips) against the validated and clinically widely used Complior device (Alam Medical).

Methods: We recruited 33 subjects with a wide distribution of PWV. For the validation, PWV was measured sequentially with the Complior device (four times) and the Philips prototype (three times). With the 99 paired PWV values, we investigated the agreement between the Philips prototype and the Complior device using Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plot. We also performed analysis on the determinants and reproducibility of PWV measured with both devices.

Results: The correlation coefficient for PWV measured with the two devices was 0.92 (p < 0.0001). Compared with the Complior device, the Philips prototype slightly overestimated PWV by 0.24 (± 2 standard deviations, ± 1.91) m/s, especially when PWV was high. The correlation coefficient between the difference and the average of the Philips and Complior measurements was 0.21 (p = 0.035). Nonetheless, they had similar determinants. Age, mean arterial pressure, and sex altogether explained 81.6 and 83.9% of the variance of PWV values measured with the Philips prototype and Complior device, respectively. When the two extremes of the three PWV values measured with the Philips prototype and the Complior device were investigated, the coefficients of variation were 8.26 and 3.26%, respectively.

Conclusions: Compared with the Complior device, the Philips prototype had similar accuracy, determinants, and reproducibility in measuring PWV.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于压电传感器阵列的颈-股脉搏波速度测量装置的验证:Philips原型。
背景:将多个压电式压力机械传感器拓扑化成阵列可以提高采集动脉压力波形的效率和准确性,从而测量脉搏波速度(PWV)。目的:在本研究中,我们验证了基于压电传感器阵列的原型(Philips)与经过验证并在临床上广泛使用的Complior设备(Alam Medical)。方法:我们招募了33名广泛分布的PWV受试者。为了验证,使用Complior设备(4次)和Philips原型(3次)依次测量PWV。使用99个配对的PWV值,我们使用Pearson相关分析和Bland-Altman图来调查Philips原型和Complior装置之间的一致性。我们还对两种设备测量的PWV的决定因素和再现性进行了分析。结果:两种仪器测量的PWV相关系数为0.92 (p < 0.0001)。与Complior器件相比,Philips样机略微高估了0.24(±2个标准差,±1.91)m/s,特别是在PWV较高时。Philips和Complior测量值的差异与平均值的相关系数为0.21 (p = 0.035)。尽管如此,它们有相似的决定因素。年龄、平均动脉压和性别分别解释了Philips原型和Complior装置测量的PWV值方差的81.6%和83.9%。对Philips样机和Complior装置测得的三个PWV值的两个极值进行分析,变异系数分别为8.26和3.26%。结论:与Complior设备相比,Philips样机在测量PWV时具有相似的准确性、决定因素和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信