A cross-sectional study of small mammals for tick-borne pathogen infection in northern Mongolia.

Q1 Environmental Science
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology Pub Date : 2018-03-16 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20008686.2018.1450591
Laura A Pulscher, Thomas C Moore, Luke Caddell, Lkhagvatseren Sukhbaatar, Michael E von Fricken, Benjamin D Anderson, Battsetseg Gonchigoo, Gregory C Gray
{"title":"A cross-sectional study of small mammals for tick-borne pathogen infection in northern Mongolia.","authors":"Laura A Pulscher,&nbsp;Thomas C Moore,&nbsp;Luke Caddell,&nbsp;Lkhagvatseren Sukhbaatar,&nbsp;Michael E von Fricken,&nbsp;Benjamin D Anderson,&nbsp;Battsetseg Gonchigoo,&nbsp;Gregory C Gray","doi":"10.1080/20008686.2018.1450591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) are frequently studied in developed nations but are often neglected in emerging countries. In Mongolia, TBP research is especially sparse, with few research reports focusing upon human and domestic animal disease and tick ecology. However, little information exists on TBPs in small mammals. <b>Methods</b>: In this 2016 cross-sectional pilot study, we sought to uniquely study wildlife for TBPs. We live-trapped small mammals, and tested their whole blood, serum and ear biopsy samples for molecular or serological evidence of <i>Borrelia</i> spp., <i>Rickettsia</i> spp., <i>and Anaplasma</i> spp.<i>/Ehrlichia</i> spp. <b>Results</b>: Of 64 small mammals collected, 56.0%, 39.0% and 0.0% of animals were positive by molecular assays for <i>Borrelia</i> spp., <i>Rickettsia</i> spp., and <i>Anaplasma</i> spp.<i>/Erhlicia</i> spp., respectively. 41.9% were seropositive for <i>A. phagocytophilum</i> and 24.2% of animals were seropositive for <i>Rickettsia rickettsii</i>. <b>Conclusion</b>: This pilot data demonstrates evidence of a number of TBPs among small mammal populations in northern Mongolia and suggests the need to further investigate what role these mammals play in human and domestic animal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":37446,"journal":{"name":"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1450591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20008686.2018.1450591","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2018.1450591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) are frequently studied in developed nations but are often neglected in emerging countries. In Mongolia, TBP research is especially sparse, with few research reports focusing upon human and domestic animal disease and tick ecology. However, little information exists on TBPs in small mammals. Methods: In this 2016 cross-sectional pilot study, we sought to uniquely study wildlife for TBPs. We live-trapped small mammals, and tested their whole blood, serum and ear biopsy samples for molecular or serological evidence of Borrelia spp., Rickettsia spp., and Anaplasma spp./Ehrlichia spp. Results: Of 64 small mammals collected, 56.0%, 39.0% and 0.0% of animals were positive by molecular assays for Borrelia spp., Rickettsia spp., and Anaplasma spp./Erhlicia spp., respectively. 41.9% were seropositive for A. phagocytophilum and 24.2% of animals were seropositive for Rickettsia rickettsii. Conclusion: This pilot data demonstrates evidence of a number of TBPs among small mammal populations in northern Mongolia and suggests the need to further investigate what role these mammals play in human and domestic animal disease.

Abstract Image

蒙古国北部小哺乳动物蜱传病原体感染的横断面研究。
背景:蜱传病原体(tbp)在发达国家经常被研究,但在新兴国家往往被忽视。在蒙古,TBP研究尤其稀少,很少有研究报告关注人类和家畜疾病以及蜱虫生态学。然而,关于小型哺乳动物tbp的信息很少。方法:在这项2016年的横断面试点研究中,我们试图独特地研究野生动物对tbp的影响。结果:64只小兽中,伯氏疏螺旋体、立克次体和无形体/埃利希氏体分子检测阳性率分别为56.0%、39.0%和0.0%;41.9%的动物嗜吞噬芽胞杆菌血清检测阳性,24.2%的动物立克次体血清检测阳性。结论:这一试点数据证明了蒙古北部小型哺乳动物种群中存在一些tbp的证据,表明有必要进一步调查这些哺乳动物在人类和家畜疾病中所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Ecology & Epidemiology aims to stimulate inter-disciplinary collaborations dealing with a range of subjects, from the plethora of zoonotic infections in humans, over diseases with implication in wildlife ecology, to advanced virology and bacteriology. The journal specifically welcomes papers from studies where researchers from multiple medical and ecological disciplines are collaborating so as to increase our knowledge of the emergence, spread and effect of new and re-emerged infectious diseases in humans, domestic animals and wildlife. Main areas of interest include, but are not limited to: 1.Zoonotic microbioorganisms 2.Vector borne infections 3.Gastrointestinal pathogens 4.Antimicrobial resistance 5.Zoonotic microbioorganisms in changing environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信