[CyberKnife for prostate cancer patients. Update of 200 patients treatment results].

Przeglad lekarski Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Leszek Miszczyk, Aleksandra Napieralska, Agnieszka Namysł-Kaletka, Grzegorz Woźniak, Małgorzata Stapór-Fudzińska, Grzegorz Głowacki, Andrzej Tukiendorf
{"title":"[CyberKnife for prostate cancer patients. Update of 200 patients treatment results].","authors":"Leszek Miszczyk,&nbsp;Aleksandra Napieralska,&nbsp;Agnieszka Namysł-Kaletka,&nbsp;Grzegorz Woźniak,&nbsp;Małgorzata Stapór-Fudzińska,&nbsp;Grzegorz Głowacki,&nbsp;Andrzej Tukiendorf","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This is an update regarding\nthe treatment results of 200\nprostate cancer patients’ (PCP) CyberKnife\nbased radioablation (the first\ngroup in Poland).\nThe purpose of this study is reevaluation\n(after 2 years) of this treatment\nmodality results of low (LR) and\nintermediate risk (IR) (including T2c)\nPCP and failure analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>200 PCP (95\nLR, 86 IR, 19 T2c) 53 – 83 y.o. (mean 69)\ntreated between 2011 and 2014. 48%\nused neoadjuvant ADT. The patients\nwere irradiated every other day with\na fraction dose of 7.25 Gy to the total\ndose 36.25 Gy (5 fractions in 9 days).\nFiducials based tracking was performed.\nThe patients were controlled\non the treatment completion day, 1, 4,\n8 months later and subsequently every\n6 months. The PSA concentration,\nADT usage, acute and late adverse effects\n(EORTC/RTOG) and other symptoms\nwere evaluated. FU ranged from\n1 to 63.6 months (mean 32.2, median\n32.9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adverse effects percentage\nwas very low; only 1 month\nafter treatment the percentage of\nacute urinary reaction exceeded 40%.\nOnly single G3 adverse effects were\nnoted. Over 4 months the median\nPSA concentration declined from 3.75\nto 0.27 ng/ml. 9 failures (4.5%) were\nnoted – more among IR and patients\nwithout neoadjuvant ADT. No failure\nin the T2c group was found. Median\ntime to failure was 32.4 months. Cox\nanalysis revealed that the failure risk\nincreases with the value of maximal\nPSA before treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CK based radioablation of LR and\nIR PCP is a safe and highly effective\ntreatment modality.\nThe main prognostic factor of failure\nafter this treatment is probably\nthe maximal PSA concentration before\ntreatment.\nThe neoadjuvant ADT in IR group\nshould be considered.\nThe lack of failures in the T2c group enables us to suggest\nthat even more locally advanced patients (T3) with\nlow PSA and maximal Gleason 3+4 could be treated with\nthis modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":21148,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad lekarski","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This is an update regarding the treatment results of 200 prostate cancer patients’ (PCP) CyberKnife based radioablation (the first group in Poland). The purpose of this study is reevaluation (after 2 years) of this treatment modality results of low (LR) and intermediate risk (IR) (including T2c) PCP and failure analysis.

Material and methods: 200 PCP (95 LR, 86 IR, 19 T2c) 53 – 83 y.o. (mean 69) treated between 2011 and 2014. 48% used neoadjuvant ADT. The patients were irradiated every other day with a fraction dose of 7.25 Gy to the total dose 36.25 Gy (5 fractions in 9 days). Fiducials based tracking was performed. The patients were controlled on the treatment completion day, 1, 4, 8 months later and subsequently every 6 months. The PSA concentration, ADT usage, acute and late adverse effects (EORTC/RTOG) and other symptoms were evaluated. FU ranged from 1 to 63.6 months (mean 32.2, median 32.9).

Results: The adverse effects percentage was very low; only 1 month after treatment the percentage of acute urinary reaction exceeded 40%. Only single G3 adverse effects were noted. Over 4 months the median PSA concentration declined from 3.75 to 0.27 ng/ml. 9 failures (4.5%) were noted – more among IR and patients without neoadjuvant ADT. No failure in the T2c group was found. Median time to failure was 32.4 months. Cox analysis revealed that the failure risk increases with the value of maximal PSA before treatment.

Conclusions: CK based radioablation of LR and IR PCP is a safe and highly effective treatment modality. The main prognostic factor of failure after this treatment is probably the maximal PSA concentration before treatment. The neoadjuvant ADT in IR group should be considered. The lack of failures in the T2c group enables us to suggest that even more locally advanced patients (T3) with low PSA and maximal Gleason 3+4 could be treated with this modality.

前列腺癌患者的射波刀。更新200例患者的治疗结果]。
简介:这是关于200名前列腺癌患者(PCP)基于cyberknife的放射消融治疗结果的更新(波兰的第一组)。本研究的目的是重新评估(2年后)这种治疗方式的低(LR)和中风险(IR)(包括T2c)PCP结果和失败分析。材料和方法:2011年至2014年治疗的200例PCP (95LR, 86 IR, 19 T2c) 53 - 83例(平均69例)。48%采用新辅助ADT。每隔一天接受一次7.25 Gy至36.25 Gy的部分剂量照射,共9天5次。进行了基于基准的跟踪。分别于治疗结束当天、1、4、8个月及以后每6个月进行对照。观察两组患者PSA浓度、ADT用量、急性和晚期不良反应(EORTC/RTOG)及其他症状。FU范围为1 ~ 63.6个月(平均32.2个月,中位32.9个月)。结果:不良反应发生率极低;治疗后仅1个月,急性尿反应率超过40%。仅注意到单个G3不良反应。4个月后,中位psa浓度从3.75 ng/ml下降到0.27 ng/ml。9例失败(4.5%)被注意到-在IR和没有新辅助ADT的患者中更多。T2c组未见治疗失败。到失败的中位时间为32.4个月。联合分析显示,治疗前psa值越高,治疗失败的风险越高。结论:以CK为基础放射消融LR和dir PCP是一种安全、高效的治疗方法。治疗失败的主要预后因素可能是治疗前的最大PSA浓度。IR组应考虑新辅助ADT。T2c组没有失败,这使我们认为,即使是更低PSA和最大Gleason 3+4的局部晚期患者(T3)也可以采用这种方式治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信