Marta Nakonieczna-Rudnicka, Teresa Bachanek, Wanda Piekarczyk, Elżbieta Kobyłecka
{"title":"Secretory immunoglobulin A concentration in non-stimulated and stimulated saliva in relation to the status of smoking.","authors":"Marta Nakonieczna-Rudnicka, Teresa Bachanek, Wanda Piekarczyk, Elżbieta Kobyłecka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Secretory immunoglobulin\nA (sIgA) is a dominant immunoglobulin\nin the saliva. It is the first\nline of defense against microorganisms.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Analysis of secretory\nimmunoglobulin A concentration\nin non-stimulated and stimulated\nsaliva. Assessment of sIgA concentration\nin relation to the status of cigarette\nsmoking of the investigated.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Survey and biochemical studies of saliva were\nconducted in the group of 109 people\n(smokers and non-smokers) aged\n20-54. The smokers smoked from\n5 to more than 20 cigarettes daily.\nThe investigation material was nonstimulated\nand stimulated saliva collected\nfrom patients on the same day\nbetween 9.30 and 11.30 a.m, 1.5-2h\nafter meal. Directly after non-stimulated\nand stimulated saliva collection\nSalivette tubes were placed in the ice\ncontainer with the temperature of 4oC,\nthen centrifuged at the temperature\nof 4oC for 12 minutes at 3000 r/min.\nThe obtained supernatant was stored\nat the temperature of -75ºC until the\nassays were performed. sIgA concentration\nwas determined using sIgA\nELISA Kit (Immunodiagnostik AG,\nGermany). Statistical analysis was\nconducted with the use of Mann –\nWhitney test. While investigating the\ninfluence of age on the studied parameters\nSpearman correlation coefficient\nand its significance were used.\nStatistically significant test values\nwere those of p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In non-stimulated saliva\nsIgA concentration was significantly\nhigher compared to stimulated saliva\n(Z = 4.00, p<0.001). No significant differences\nwere stated in sIgA concentration\nin non-stimulated saliva between\nsmokers and non-smokers (Z =\n0.26, p>0.05). No essential differences\nwere stated in sIgA concentration in\nstimulated saliva between non-smokers\nand smokers (Z = 0.23, p>0.05).\nEssential differences were stated between\nthe groups. In men sIgA concentration in stimulated\nsaliva was significantly higher compared to women (Z =\n2.25, p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>sIgA concentration in non-stimulated\nsaliva is significantly higher in comparison to stimulated\nsaliva. The status of cigarette smoking does not influence\nthe essential differences in sIgA concentration in nonstimulated\nand stimulated saliva. In men sIgA concentration\nin stimulated saliva is significantly higher in comparison\nto women.</p>","PeriodicalId":21148,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad lekarski","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Secretory immunoglobulin
A (sIgA) is a dominant immunoglobulin
in the saliva. It is the first
line of defense against microorganisms.
Aim of the study: Analysis of secretory
immunoglobulin A concentration
in non-stimulated and stimulated
saliva. Assessment of sIgA concentration
in relation to the status of cigarette
smoking of the investigated.
Material and methods: Survey and biochemical studies of saliva were
conducted in the group of 109 people
(smokers and non-smokers) aged
20-54. The smokers smoked from
5 to more than 20 cigarettes daily.
The investigation material was nonstimulated
and stimulated saliva collected
from patients on the same day
between 9.30 and 11.30 a.m, 1.5-2h
after meal. Directly after non-stimulated
and stimulated saliva collection
Salivette tubes were placed in the ice
container with the temperature of 4oC,
then centrifuged at the temperature
of 4oC for 12 minutes at 3000 r/min.
The obtained supernatant was stored
at the temperature of -75ºC until the
assays were performed. sIgA concentration
was determined using sIgA
ELISA Kit (Immunodiagnostik AG,
Germany). Statistical analysis was
conducted with the use of Mann –
Whitney test. While investigating the
influence of age on the studied parameters
Spearman correlation coefficient
and its significance were used.
Statistically significant test values
were those of p<0.05.
Results: In non-stimulated saliva
sIgA concentration was significantly
higher compared to stimulated saliva
(Z = 4.00, p<0.001). No significant differences
were stated in sIgA concentration
in non-stimulated saliva between
smokers and non-smokers (Z =
0.26, p>0.05). No essential differences
were stated in sIgA concentration in
stimulated saliva between non-smokers
and smokers (Z = 0.23, p>0.05).
Essential differences were stated between
the groups. In men sIgA concentration in stimulated
saliva was significantly higher compared to women (Z =
2.25, p<0.05).
Conclusions: sIgA concentration in non-stimulated
saliva is significantly higher in comparison to stimulated
saliva. The status of cigarette smoking does not influence
the essential differences in sIgA concentration in nonstimulated
and stimulated saliva. In men sIgA concentration
in stimulated saliva is significantly higher in comparison
to women.