Crossing barriers: a multidisciplinary approach to children and adults with young-onset movement disorders.

Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders Pub Date : 2018-04-06 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40734-018-0070-x
Martje E van Egmond, Hendriekje Eggink, Anouk Kuiper, Deborah A Sival, Corien C Verschuuren-Bemelmans, Marina A J Tijssen, Tom J de Koning
{"title":"Crossing barriers: a multidisciplinary approach to children and adults with young-onset movement disorders.","authors":"Martje E van Egmond, Hendriekje Eggink, Anouk Kuiper, Deborah A Sival, Corien C Verschuuren-Bemelmans, Marina A J Tijssen, Tom J de Koning","doi":"10.1186/s40734-018-0070-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosis of less common young-onset movement disorders is often challenging, requiring a broad spectrum of skills of clinicians regarding phenotyping, normal and abnormal development and the wide range of possible acquired and genetic etiologies. This complexity often leads to considerable diagnostic delays, paralleled by uncertainty for patients and their families. Therefore, we hypothesized that these patients might benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. We report on the first 100 young-onset movement disorders patients who visited our multidisciplinary outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data were obtained from the medical records of patients with disease-onset before age 18 years. We investigated whether the multidisciplinary team, consisting of a movement disorder specialist, pediatric neurologist, pediatrician for inborn errors of metabolism and clinical geneticist, revised the movement disorder classification, etiological diagnosis, and/or treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 100 referred patients (56 males) had a mean age of 12.5 ± 6.3 years and mean disease duration of 9.2 ± 6.3 years. Movement disorder classification was revised in 58/100 patients. Particularly dystonia and myoclonus were recognized frequently and supported by neurophysiological testing in 24/29 patients. Etiological diagnoses were made in 24/71 (34%) formerly undiagnosed patients, predominantly in the genetic domain. Treatment strategy was adjusted in 60 patients, of whom 43 (72%) reported a subjective positive effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study demonstrates that a dedicated tertiary multidisciplinary approach to complex young-onset movement disorders may facilitate phenotyping and improve recognition of rare disorders, with a high diagnostic yield and minimal diagnostic delay. Future studies are needed to investigate the cost-benefit ratio of a multidisciplinary approach in comparison to regular subspecialty care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","volume":"5 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40734-018-0070-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of less common young-onset movement disorders is often challenging, requiring a broad spectrum of skills of clinicians regarding phenotyping, normal and abnormal development and the wide range of possible acquired and genetic etiologies. This complexity often leads to considerable diagnostic delays, paralleled by uncertainty for patients and their families. Therefore, we hypothesized that these patients might benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. We report on the first 100 young-onset movement disorders patients who visited our multidisciplinary outpatient clinic.

Methods: Clinical data were obtained from the medical records of patients with disease-onset before age 18 years. We investigated whether the multidisciplinary team, consisting of a movement disorder specialist, pediatric neurologist, pediatrician for inborn errors of metabolism and clinical geneticist, revised the movement disorder classification, etiological diagnosis, and/or treatment.

Results: The 100 referred patients (56 males) had a mean age of 12.5 ± 6.3 years and mean disease duration of 9.2 ± 6.3 years. Movement disorder classification was revised in 58/100 patients. Particularly dystonia and myoclonus were recognized frequently and supported by neurophysiological testing in 24/29 patients. Etiological diagnoses were made in 24/71 (34%) formerly undiagnosed patients, predominantly in the genetic domain. Treatment strategy was adjusted in 60 patients, of whom 43 (72%) reported a subjective positive effect.

Conclusions: This exploratory study demonstrates that a dedicated tertiary multidisciplinary approach to complex young-onset movement disorders may facilitate phenotyping and improve recognition of rare disorders, with a high diagnostic yield and minimal diagnostic delay. Future studies are needed to investigate the cost-benefit ratio of a multidisciplinary approach in comparison to regular subspecialty care.

跨越障碍:为患有幼年运动障碍的儿童和成人提供多学科方法。
背景:较少见的年轻发病型运动障碍的诊断通常具有挑战性,需要临床医生在表型、正常和异常发育以及各种可能的获得性和遗传病因方面具备广泛的技能。这种复杂性往往会导致诊断的严重延误,同时给患者及其家属带来不确定性。因此,我们假设这些患者可以从多学科方法中获益。我们报告了首批到我们多学科门诊就诊的 100 名年轻运动障碍患者的情况:方法:我们从 18 岁前发病患者的病历中获取了临床数据。我们调查了由运动障碍专家、儿科神经学家、先天性代谢异常儿科医生和临床遗传学家组成的多学科团队是否修改了运动障碍的分类、病因诊断和/或治疗方法:100 名转诊患者(56 名男性)的平均年龄为(12.5±6.3)岁,平均病程为(9.2±6.3)年。每100名患者中有58人的运动障碍分类得到了修订。在 24/29 例患者中,肌张力障碍和肌阵挛被频繁识别,并得到神经电生理测试的支持。对 24/71 名(34%)以前未确诊的患者进行了病因诊断,主要是遗传学方面的诊断。对 60 名患者的治疗策略进行了调整,其中 43 人(72%)报告了主观的积极效果:这项探索性研究表明,针对复杂的年轻发病型运动障碍采用专门的三级多学科方法可促进表型分析,提高对罕见疾病的识别率,同时提高诊断率,将诊断延误降至最低。未来的研究还需要对多学科方法与常规亚专科治疗的成本效益比进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信