Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Tool on Post-operative Use of Radioactive Iodine.

Q2 Medicine
European Endocrinology Pub Date : 2017-04-01 Epub Date: 2017-04-03 DOI:10.17925/EE.2017.13.01.26
Shrujal S Baxi, Rachel Kurtzman, Anne Eaton, Eliza Dewey, Craig Bickford, Stephanie Fish, Leonard Wartofsky, R Michael Tuttle
{"title":"Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Tool on Post-operative Use of Radioactive Iodine.","authors":"Shrujal S Baxi,&nbsp;Rachel Kurtzman,&nbsp;Anne Eaton,&nbsp;Eliza Dewey,&nbsp;Craig Bickford,&nbsp;Stephanie Fish,&nbsp;Leonard Wartofsky,&nbsp;R Michael Tuttle","doi":"10.17925/EE.2017.13.01.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative developed a web-based clinical decision-making module (CDMM) to inform risk-adjusted decisions on post-thyroidectomy radioactive iodine (RAI) use in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). <b>Methods</b>: In a pilot study, we evaluated the CDMM in 19 PTC cases representing low- (five), intermediate- (seven) and high-risk (seven) disease. Two PTC experts and 10 PTC physicians reviewed cases and assigned risk level and RAI recommendation. The experts used a standard approach while the others used the CDMM. We assessed agreement between responses using a weighted Kappa. <b>Results</b>: Between experts, risk-assignment was concordant in 100%, 57% and 86% of low-, intermediate- and high-risk cases, respectively. Between CDMM users, risk-assignment was concordant in 100%, 29% and 14% in low-, intermediate- and high-risk cases, respectively (p=0.01). CDMM-assigned risk agreed with the expert-assigned risk in 100%, 25% and 0% of low-, intermediate- and high-risk cases, respectively (Kappa=0.69). For RAI use, the experts agreed in 15 cases while CDMM users agreed in eight. On further analysis, interpretation of extrathyroidal extension and lymph node staging led to discrepancies with the CDMM. <b>Conclusions</b>: For a web-based CDMM to accurately inform appropriate use of RAI in PTC, standard pathological and surgical reports are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":38860,"journal":{"name":"European Endocrinology","volume":"13 1","pages":"26-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813442/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/EE.2017.13.01.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative developed a web-based clinical decision-making module (CDMM) to inform risk-adjusted decisions on post-thyroidectomy radioactive iodine (RAI) use in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Methods: In a pilot study, we evaluated the CDMM in 19 PTC cases representing low- (five), intermediate- (seven) and high-risk (seven) disease. Two PTC experts and 10 PTC physicians reviewed cases and assigned risk level and RAI recommendation. The experts used a standard approach while the others used the CDMM. We assessed agreement between responses using a weighted Kappa. Results: Between experts, risk-assignment was concordant in 100%, 57% and 86% of low-, intermediate- and high-risk cases, respectively. Between CDMM users, risk-assignment was concordant in 100%, 29% and 14% in low-, intermediate- and high-risk cases, respectively (p=0.01). CDMM-assigned risk agreed with the expert-assigned risk in 100%, 25% and 0% of low-, intermediate- and high-risk cases, respectively (Kappa=0.69). For RAI use, the experts agreed in 15 cases while CDMM users agreed in eight. On further analysis, interpretation of extrathyroidal extension and lymph node staging led to discrepancies with the CDMM. Conclusions: For a web-based CDMM to accurately inform appropriate use of RAI in PTC, standard pathological and surgical reports are necessary.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于网络的术后放射性碘使用决策工具的初步研究。
背景:甲状腺癌护理协作开发了一个基于网络的临床决策模块(CDMM),为甲状腺切除术后放射性碘(RAI)在乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)中的使用提供风险调整决策。方法:在一项初步研究中,我们评估了19例低危(5例)、中危(7例)和高危(7例)PTC病例的CDMM。两名PTC专家和10名PTC医生审查了病例,并分配了风险水平和RAI建议。专家们使用标准方法,而其他人使用CDMM。我们使用加权Kappa来评估回答之间的一致性。结果:专家之间的风险分配在100%、57%和86%的低、中、高风险病例中是一致的。在CDMM使用者之间,低、中、高风险病例的风险分配分别为100%、29%和14% (p=0.01)。cdmm分配的风险与专家分配的风险分别在100%、25%和0%的低、中、高风险病例中一致(Kappa=0.69)。对于RAI的使用,专家们同意了15个案例,而CDMM用户同意了8个案例。进一步分析,甲状腺外展和淋巴结分期的解释导致与CDMM的差异。结论:为了使基于网络的CDMM准确地告知在PTC中正确使用RAI,标准的病理和手术报告是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endocrinology
European Endocrinology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信