Clinical utility of a predictive model for paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expandable prosthesis

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ahmad E. Mostafa , Gert Richardt , Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
{"title":"Clinical utility of a predictive model for paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expandable prosthesis","authors":"Ahmad E. Mostafa ,&nbsp;Gert Richardt ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdel-Wahab","doi":"10.1016/j.ehj.2017.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A predictive model for Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) integrating the left ventricular outflow tract-to-ascending aorta angle (LVOT-AO) and depth to the non-coronary cusp (NCC) after TAVI with CoreValve prosthesis (MCP) was retrospectively identified (2<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->∠LVOT-AO<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->[depth to NCC-10]2; cutoff<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->50). However, the validity and clinical utility of this model remain unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 100 patients (79.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7<!--> <!-->years, mean EuroScore 24.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16.3%, 41 males) constituted a validation cohort for the predictive model. Both angle (LVOT-AO) and depth to NCC were considered during patient selection and device implantation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant AR occurred in 16% (group A) vs. 84% (group B). Angle ∠LVOT-AO and depth to NCC were larger in group A compared to group B (16.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.2 vs. 11.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.1, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001, and 9.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.8<!--> <!-->mm vs. 6.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.7<!--> <!-->mm, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004). The model showed a sensitivity of 68.7% and a specificity of 88.1% in prediction of PAR. Comparing the derivation cohort (initial experience, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->50) and validation cohort (later experience, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->100) it is showed that the ∠LVOT-AO, valve depth and PAR were significantly lower (12.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.9 and 6.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.2<!--> <!-->mm vs. 19.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.9 and 10.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.7<!--> <!-->mm, 40% vs. 16% respectively, all <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) in the validation cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The predictive model for significant PAR after TAVI using MCP is valid with a reassuring specificity and an acceptable sensitivity. A strategy incorporating these anatomical and procedural variables improves PAR after TAVI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44962,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Heart Journal","volume":"69 4","pages":"Pages 253-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehj.2017.06.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260817300716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

A predictive model for Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) integrating the left ventricular outflow tract-to-ascending aorta angle (LVOT-AO) and depth to the non-coronary cusp (NCC) after TAVI with CoreValve prosthesis (MCP) was retrospectively identified (2 × ∠LVOT-AO + [depth to NCC-10]2; cutoff = 50). However, the validity and clinical utility of this model remain unknown.

Methods

A total of 100 patients (79.6 ± 7 years, mean EuroScore 24.9 ± 16.3%, 41 males) constituted a validation cohort for the predictive model. Both angle (LVOT-AO) and depth to NCC were considered during patient selection and device implantation.

Results

Significant AR occurred in 16% (group A) vs. 84% (group B). Angle ∠LVOT-AO and depth to NCC were larger in group A compared to group B (16.4 ± 7.2 vs. 11.8 ± 4.1, p < 0.001, and 9.1 ± 4.8 mm vs. 6.6 ± 2.7 mm, p = 0.004). The model showed a sensitivity of 68.7% and a specificity of 88.1% in prediction of PAR. Comparing the derivation cohort (initial experience, n = 50) and validation cohort (later experience, n = 100) it is showed that the ∠LVOT-AO, valve depth and PAR were significantly lower (12.5 ± 4.9 and 6.9 ± 3.2 mm vs. 19.7 ± 7.9 and 10.4 ± 3.7 mm, 40% vs. 16% respectively, all p < 0.001) in the validation cohort.

Conclusion

The predictive model for significant PAR after TAVI using MCP is valid with a reassuring specificity and an acceptable sensitivity. A strategy incorporating these anatomical and procedural variables improves PAR after TAVI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经导管主动脉瓣植入术后瓣旁主动脉瓣反流预测模型的临床应用
回顾性建立了基于CoreValve假体(MCP) TAVI术后左心室流出道至升主动脉角(LVOT-AO)和非冠状动脉尖(NCC)深度的瓣旁主动脉瓣返流(PAR)预测模型(2 ×∠LVOT-AO +[至NCC-10深度]2;cutoff = 50)。然而,该模型的有效性和临床应用仍然未知。方法100例患者(79.6±7岁,平均EuroScore 24.9±16.3%,男性41例)构成预测模型的验证队列。在患者选择和装置植入时,考虑了NCC的角度(LVOT-AO)和深度。结果显著性AR发生率为16% (A组)比84% (B组),A组的LVOT-AO角度和NCC深度均大于B组(16.4±7.2比11.8±4.1,p <0.001和9.1±4.8毫米和6.6±2.7毫米,p = 0.004)。该模型预测PAR的敏感性为68.7%,特异性为88.1%。将衍生队列(初始经验,n = 50)和验证队列(后期经验,n = 100)进行比较,结果表明,LVOT-AO、瓣膜深度和PAR均显著降低(12.5±4.9和6.9±3.2 mm vs. 19.7±7.9和10.4±3.7 mm,分别为40%和16%,均p <0.001)。结论应用MCP预测TAVI术后明显PAR的模型是有效的,具有可靠的特异性和可接受的敏感性。结合这些解剖和程序变量的策略可以改善TAVI后的PAR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Heart Journal
Egyptian Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Heart Journal is the official journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology. It is an international journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies and translational investigations. The journal publishes research, review articles, case reports and commentary articles, as well as editorials interpreting and commenting on the research presented. In addition, it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信