Patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease admitted with acute myocardial infarction carry a better outcome compared to those with obstructive coronary artery disease
{"title":"Patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease admitted with acute myocardial infarction carry a better outcome compared to those with obstructive coronary artery disease","authors":"Yasser Yazied Abdelmonem, Adel Abdelgawad Bakr, Hossam Ghanem El-Hossary, Mohammed Mahmoud Abdel Ghany","doi":"10.1016/j.ehj.2017.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The characterization of patients who have acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and insignificant coronary stenosis is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The present study aimed to investigate the clinical profile, in-hospital and 3-month outcome of AMI patients with insignificant coronary stenosis in comparison with those with significant disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective observational study included 200 consecutive patients admitted with AMI. Group I (100 patients) included patients with insignificant CAD (all lesions <50% stenosis). Group II (100 patients) included patients with one or more lesions >70% stenosis. Patients with previous CABG were excluded. Patients with significant CAD had successful total revascularization.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with insignificant CAD were significantly younger (61<!--> <!-->vs. 67<!--> <!-->years, p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), more likely to be females<!--> <!-->(41% vs. 23%, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006), less likely to smoke (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006), less likely to have diabetes mellitus (p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), and less likely to have history of CAD (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.042) or prior PCI (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.037). They were also less likely to have typical anginal pain at presentation (61% vs 91%, p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), less likely to have heart failure at presentation (9% vs 30%, p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001),<!--> <!-->less likely to have<!--> <!-->ischemic ST-segment changes on presentation (10% vs 46%, p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), lower peak troponin (p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001) and CK-MB levels (p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), with lower LDL-C (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006), and higher HDL-C level (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.020). They were less likely to be treated with b-blockers (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002), ACEI/ARBS (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007), and higher rates of calcium channel blocker therapy (p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). They had lower prevalence of major adverse clinical events at follow-up (readmission for ACS (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009), need for revascularization (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.035), recurrent chest pain (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009), and cardiogenic shock (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.029).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with AMI and insignificant CAD have different clinical profile and outcome compared to those with significant disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44962,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Heart Journal","volume":"69 3","pages":"Pages 191-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehj.2017.03.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260817300108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background
The characterization of patients who have acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and insignificant coronary stenosis is unclear.
Aim
The present study aimed to investigate the clinical profile, in-hospital and 3-month outcome of AMI patients with insignificant coronary stenosis in comparison with those with significant disease.
Methods
This prospective observational study included 200 consecutive patients admitted with AMI. Group I (100 patients) included patients with insignificant CAD (all lesions <50% stenosis). Group II (100 patients) included patients with one or more lesions >70% stenosis. Patients with previous CABG were excluded. Patients with significant CAD had successful total revascularization.
Results
Patients with insignificant CAD were significantly younger (61 vs. 67 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be females (41% vs. 23%, p = 0.006), less likely to smoke (p = 0.006), less likely to have diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), and less likely to have history of CAD (p = 0.042) or prior PCI (p = 0.037). They were also less likely to have typical anginal pain at presentation (61% vs 91%, p < 0.001), less likely to have heart failure at presentation (9% vs 30%, p < 0.001), less likely to have ischemic ST-segment changes on presentation (10% vs 46%, p < 0.001), lower peak troponin (p < 0.001) and CK-MB levels (p < 0.001), with lower LDL-C (p = 0.006), and higher HDL-C level (p = 0.020). They were less likely to be treated with b-blockers (p = 0.002), ACEI/ARBS (p = 0.007), and higher rates of calcium channel blocker therapy (p < 0.001). They had lower prevalence of major adverse clinical events at follow-up (readmission for ACS (p = 0.009), need for revascularization (p = 0.035), recurrent chest pain (p = 0.009), and cardiogenic shock (p = 0.029).
Conclusion
Patients with AMI and insignificant CAD have different clinical profile and outcome compared to those with significant disease.
期刊介绍:
The Egyptian Heart Journal is the official journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology. It is an international journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies and translational investigations. The journal publishes research, review articles, case reports and commentary articles, as well as editorials interpreting and commenting on the research presented. In addition, it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational issues.