Defining Success in Open Science.

MNI open research Pub Date : 2018-02-09 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mniopenres.12780.1
Sarah E Ali-Khan, Antoine Jean, Emily MacDonald, E Richard Gold
{"title":"Defining Success in Open Science.","authors":"Sarah E Ali-Khan,&nbsp;Antoine Jean,&nbsp;Emily MacDonald,&nbsp;E Richard Gold","doi":"10.12688/mniopenres.12780.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mounting evidence indicates that worldwide, innovation systems are increasing unsustainable. Equally, concerns about inequities in the science and innovation process, and in access to its benefits, continue. Against a backdrop of growing health, economic and scientific challenges global stakeholders are urgently seeking to spur innovation and maximize the just distribution of benefits for all. Open Science collaboration (OS) - comprising a variety of approaches to increase open, public, and rapid mobilization of scientific knowledge - is seen to be one of the most promising ways forward. Yet, many decision-makers hesitate to construct policy to support the adoption and implementation of OS without access to substantive, clear and reliable evidence. In October 2017, international thought-leaders gathered at an Open Science Leadership Forum in the Washington DC offices of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to share their views on what successful Open Science looks like. Delegates from developed and developing nations, national governments, science agencies and funding bodies, philanthropy, researchers, patient organizations and the biotechnology, pharma and artificial intelligence (AI) industries discussed the outcomes that would rally them to invest in OS, as well as wider issues of policy and implementation. This first of two reports, summarizes delegates' views on what they believe OS will deliver in terms of research, innovation and social impact in the life sciences. Through open and collaborative process over the next months, we will translate these success outcomes into a toolkit of quantitative and qualitative indicators to assess when, where and how open science collaborations best advance research, innovation and social benefit. Ultimately, this work aims to develop and openly share tools to allow stakeholders to evaluate and re-invent their innovation ecosystems, to maximize value for the global public and patients, and address long-standing questions about the mechanics of innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":92266,"journal":{"name":"MNI open research","volume":"2 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852639/pdf/","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MNI open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mniopenres.12780.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Mounting evidence indicates that worldwide, innovation systems are increasing unsustainable. Equally, concerns about inequities in the science and innovation process, and in access to its benefits, continue. Against a backdrop of growing health, economic and scientific challenges global stakeholders are urgently seeking to spur innovation and maximize the just distribution of benefits for all. Open Science collaboration (OS) - comprising a variety of approaches to increase open, public, and rapid mobilization of scientific knowledge - is seen to be one of the most promising ways forward. Yet, many decision-makers hesitate to construct policy to support the adoption and implementation of OS without access to substantive, clear and reliable evidence. In October 2017, international thought-leaders gathered at an Open Science Leadership Forum in the Washington DC offices of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to share their views on what successful Open Science looks like. Delegates from developed and developing nations, national governments, science agencies and funding bodies, philanthropy, researchers, patient organizations and the biotechnology, pharma and artificial intelligence (AI) industries discussed the outcomes that would rally them to invest in OS, as well as wider issues of policy and implementation. This first of two reports, summarizes delegates' views on what they believe OS will deliver in terms of research, innovation and social impact in the life sciences. Through open and collaborative process over the next months, we will translate these success outcomes into a toolkit of quantitative and qualitative indicators to assess when, where and how open science collaborations best advance research, innovation and social benefit. Ultimately, this work aims to develop and openly share tools to allow stakeholders to evaluate and re-invent their innovation ecosystems, to maximize value for the global public and patients, and address long-standing questions about the mechanics of innovation.

定义开放科学的成功。
越来越多的证据表明,在世界范围内,创新系统越来越不可持续。同样,人们对科学和创新过程中的不平等以及获取其利益方面的不平等的关切仍在继续。在卫生、经济和科学挑战日益严峻的背景下,全球利益攸关方正迫切寻求刺激创新,最大限度地为所有人公平分配利益。开放科学协作(OS)——包括各种方法来增加科学知识的开放、公开和快速动员——被认为是最有希望的前进方式之一。然而,许多决策者在没有获得实质性、清晰和可靠的证据的情况下,对制定支持OS采用和实施的政策犹豫不决。2017年10月,国际思想领袖聚集在比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会华盛顿办事处举行的开放科学领导力论坛上,就成功的开放科学是什么样子分享了他们的观点。来自发达国家和发展中国家、各国政府、科学机构和资助机构、慈善机构、研究人员、患者组织以及生物技术、制药和人工智能(AI)行业的代表讨论了将凝聚他们投资操作系统的成果,以及更广泛的政策和实施问题。这是两份报告中的第一份,总结了代表们对操作系统在生命科学研究、创新和社会影响方面的看法。通过未来几个月的开放和协作过程,我们将把这些成功成果转化为一个定量和定性指标工具包,以评估开放科学合作何时、何地以及如何最好地促进研究、创新和社会效益。最终,这项工作旨在开发和公开共享工具,使利益相关者能够评估和重新发明其创新生态系统,为全球公众和患者实现价值最大化,并解决有关创新机制的长期问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信