Comparison of Algorithms for the Detection of Enteroviruses in Stool Specimens from Children Diagnosed with Acute Flaccid Paralysis.

IF 1.1 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Pathogens Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-28 DOI:10.1155/2017/9256056
J A Adeniji, F A Ayeni, A Ibrahim, K A Tijani, T O C Faleye, M O Adewumi
{"title":"Comparison of Algorithms for the Detection of Enteroviruses in Stool Specimens from Children Diagnosed with Acute Flaccid Paralysis.","authors":"J A Adeniji,&nbsp;F A Ayeni,&nbsp;A Ibrahim,&nbsp;K A Tijani,&nbsp;T O C Faleye,&nbsp;M O Adewumi","doi":"10.1155/2017/9256056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was designed to compare both the cell culture dependent and independent enterovirus detection algorithms recommended by the WHO and assess how either might impact our perception of the diversity of enterovirus types present in a sample. Sixteen paired samples (16 isolates from RD cell culture and their corresponding stool suspension, i.e., 32 samples) from AFP cases in Nigeria were analyzed in this study. All the samples were subjected to RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, the WHO recommended RT-snPCR, and its modification. Amplicons were sequenced and strains identified. Enterovirus diversity was the same between the isolates and fecal suspension for the control and five of the samples. It was, however, different for the remaining 10 (62.5%) samples. Nine (CV-B4, E6, E7, E13, E14, E19, E29, EV-B75, and EV-B77) and five (CV-A1, CV-A11, CV-A13, EV-C99, and PV2) EV-B and EV-C types, respectively, were detected. Particularly, E19 and EV-B75 were only recovered from the isolates while E14, EV-B77, CV-A11, and CV-A13 were only recovered from fecal suspension. Both the cell culture dependent and independent protocols bias our perception of the diversity of enterovirus types present in a sample. Hence, effort should be directed at harmonizing both for increased sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathogens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/9256056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9256056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was designed to compare both the cell culture dependent and independent enterovirus detection algorithms recommended by the WHO and assess how either might impact our perception of the diversity of enterovirus types present in a sample. Sixteen paired samples (16 isolates from RD cell culture and their corresponding stool suspension, i.e., 32 samples) from AFP cases in Nigeria were analyzed in this study. All the samples were subjected to RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, the WHO recommended RT-snPCR, and its modification. Amplicons were sequenced and strains identified. Enterovirus diversity was the same between the isolates and fecal suspension for the control and five of the samples. It was, however, different for the remaining 10 (62.5%) samples. Nine (CV-B4, E6, E7, E13, E14, E19, E29, EV-B75, and EV-B77) and five (CV-A1, CV-A11, CV-A13, EV-C99, and PV2) EV-B and EV-C types, respectively, were detected. Particularly, E19 and EV-B75 were only recovered from the isolates while E14, EV-B77, CV-A11, and CV-A13 were only recovered from fecal suspension. Both the cell culture dependent and independent protocols bias our perception of the diversity of enterovirus types present in a sample. Hence, effort should be directed at harmonizing both for increased sensitivity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急性弛缓性麻痹患儿粪便中肠道病毒检测算法的比较
本研究旨在比较世界卫生组织推荐的依赖细胞培养和独立的肠道病毒检测算法,并评估两者如何影响我们对样本中存在的肠道病毒类型多样性的看法。本研究分析了来自尼日利亚AFP病例的16个成对样本(16个分离自RD细胞培养及其相应的粪便悬浮液,即32个样本)。所有样本进行RNA提取、cDNA合成、WHO推荐的RT-snPCR及其修饰。扩增子测序和菌株鉴定。分离株与粪便悬浮液(对照)和5个样品的肠道病毒多样性相同。然而,对于其余10个(62.5%)样本则不同。检出EV-B型和EV-C型分别为9种(CV-B4、E6、E7、E13、E14、E19、E29、EV-B75和EV-B77)和5种(CV-A1、CV-A11、CV-A13、EV-C99和PV2)。其中,E19和EV-B75仅从分离株中分离得到,E14、EV-B77、CV-A11和CV-A13仅从粪便悬浮液中分离得到。细胞培养依赖和独立的方案都使我们对样本中存在的肠道病毒类型多样性的看法产生偏差。因此,应努力协调两者,以提高灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathogens
Journal of Pathogens MICROBIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信