Changes in Caries Risk in a Practice-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q1 Medicine
P Rechmann, B W Chaffee, B M T Rechmann, J D B Featherstone
{"title":"Changes in Caries Risk in a Practice-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"P Rechmann,&nbsp;B W Chaffee,&nbsp;B M T Rechmann,&nbsp;J D B Featherstone","doi":"10.1177/0022034517737022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To demonstrate that Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) can be successfully implemented in dental practice, 30 dentists were recruited to perform a 2-y CAMBRA trial. Twenty-one dentists (18 private practices, 3 community clinics) participated in a randomized, controlled, parallel-arm, double-blind clinical trial with individual-level assignment of 460 participants to standard of care (control) versus active CAMBRA treatment (intervention). Control or active antimicrobial and remineralizing agents were dispensed at baseline and 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-mo recall visits according to risk level and assigned treatment arm. Primary outcome measure was dentist-determined caries risk level at recall. Among initially high-risk participants, secondary outcomes were recorded disease indicators. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit log-linear models for each outcome while accounting for repeated measurements. At 24 mo, follow-up rates were 34.3% for high-risk participants (32.1% intervention, 37.1% control) and 44.2% for low-risk participants (38.7% intervention, 49.5% control). Among 242 participants classified as high caries risk at baseline (137 intervention, 105 control), a lower percentage of participants remained at high risk in the intervention group (statistically significant at all time points). At 24 mo, 25% in the intervention group and 54% in the control group remained at high risk ( P = 0.003). Among 192 participants initially classified as low risk (93 intervention, 99 control), most participants remained at low risk. At 24 mo, 89% in the intervention group and 71% in the control group were low caries risk ( P = 0.18). The percentage of initially high-risk participants with recorded disease indicators decreased over time in both intervention and control groups, being always lower for the intervention group (statistically significant at the 12- and 18-mo time point). In this practice-based clinical trial, a significantly greater percentage of high-caries-risk participants were classified at a lower risk level after CAMBRA preventive therapies were provided. Most participants initially assessed at low caries risk stayed at low risk (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01176396).</p>","PeriodicalId":7300,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dental Research","volume":"29 1","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0022034517737022","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517737022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

To demonstrate that Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) can be successfully implemented in dental practice, 30 dentists were recruited to perform a 2-y CAMBRA trial. Twenty-one dentists (18 private practices, 3 community clinics) participated in a randomized, controlled, parallel-arm, double-blind clinical trial with individual-level assignment of 460 participants to standard of care (control) versus active CAMBRA treatment (intervention). Control or active antimicrobial and remineralizing agents were dispensed at baseline and 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-mo recall visits according to risk level and assigned treatment arm. Primary outcome measure was dentist-determined caries risk level at recall. Among initially high-risk participants, secondary outcomes were recorded disease indicators. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit log-linear models for each outcome while accounting for repeated measurements. At 24 mo, follow-up rates were 34.3% for high-risk participants (32.1% intervention, 37.1% control) and 44.2% for low-risk participants (38.7% intervention, 49.5% control). Among 242 participants classified as high caries risk at baseline (137 intervention, 105 control), a lower percentage of participants remained at high risk in the intervention group (statistically significant at all time points). At 24 mo, 25% in the intervention group and 54% in the control group remained at high risk ( P = 0.003). Among 192 participants initially classified as low risk (93 intervention, 99 control), most participants remained at low risk. At 24 mo, 89% in the intervention group and 71% in the control group were low caries risk ( P = 0.18). The percentage of initially high-risk participants with recorded disease indicators decreased over time in both intervention and control groups, being always lower for the intervention group (statistically significant at the 12- and 18-mo time point). In this practice-based clinical trial, a significantly greater percentage of high-caries-risk participants were classified at a lower risk level after CAMBRA preventive therapies were provided. Most participants initially assessed at low caries risk stayed at low risk (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01176396).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项基于实践的随机对照试验中龋病风险的变化
为了证明风险评估龋齿管理(CAMBRA)可以在牙科实践中成功实施,招募了30名牙医进行为期2年的CAMBRA试验。21名牙医(18家私人诊所,3家社区诊所)参加了一项随机、对照、平行组、双盲临床试验,460名参与者被分配到标准治疗组(对照组)和积极CAMBRA治疗组(干预组)。根据风险水平和指定的治疗组,在基线和6、12、18和24个月的召回就诊时分配对照或活性抗菌药物和再矿化药物。主要结局指标是召回时牙医确定的龋齿风险水平。在最初的高风险参与者中,次要结局是记录疾病指标。在考虑重复测量的同时,使用广义估计方程来拟合每个结果的对数线性模型。24个月时,高危组随访率为34.3%(干预组32.1%,对照组37.1%),低危组随访率为44.2%(干预组38.7%,对照组49.5%)。在基线时被分类为高龋风险的242名参与者中(干预组137名,对照组105名),干预组中仍处于高风险的参与者比例较低(在所有时间点均有统计学意义)。24个月时,干预组25%、对照组54%仍处于高危状态(P = 0.003)。在最初被分类为低风险的192名参与者中(干预93名,对照组99名),大多数参与者仍然处于低风险状态。24个月时,干预组89%和对照组71%为低龋风险(P = 0.18)。在干预组和对照组中,记录疾病指标的最初高风险参与者的百分比随着时间的推移而下降,干预组始终较低(在12个月和18个月时间点具有统计学意义)。在这项以实践为基础的临床试验中,在提供CAMBRA预防治疗后,更高比例的高龋风险参与者被归为低风险水平。大多数最初评估为低龋风险的参与者保持在低风险(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01176396)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Dental Research
Advances in Dental Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信