Rheological Properties of Commercially Available Hyaluronic Acid Products in the United States for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Knee Pain.

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mathew Nicholls, Ajay Manjoo, Peter Shaw, Faizan Niazi, Jeffrey Rosen
{"title":"Rheological Properties of Commercially Available Hyaluronic Acid Products in the United States for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Knee Pain.","authors":"Mathew Nicholls,&nbsp;Ajay Manjoo,&nbsp;Peter Shaw,&nbsp;Faizan Niazi,&nbsp;Jeffrey Rosen","doi":"10.1177/1179544117751622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The inconsistent results within the current literature regarding the efficacy of intra-articular-hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been suggested to be due to intrinsic differences between individual HA products. The purpose of this investigation is to define the rheological differences between currently available HA products in the United States at the time of this study for the treatment of knee OA, which will help elaborate on the appropriateness of classifying HA products as a class opposed to as individual agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The rheological parameters for Euflexxa, Orthovisc, Supartz, Monovisc, Synvisc, Synvisc-One, Gel-One, and Hyalgan were obtained with a TA AR 2000 EX Rheometer with a cone-plate geometry (40-mm plate diameter and a 2° cone angle) at room temperature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bulk rheological parameters of the different products suggest molecular structures traversing the range of dilute solution (Hyalgan, Supartz), semidilute solution (Euflexxa, Orthovisc), entangled solutions (Monovisc, Synvisc, Synvisc-One), and even gel-like (Gel-One) behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the differences in rheological properties between IA-HA products, the universal assessment of these products as a class may not be appropriate. Instead, it may be more appropriate to assess each product individually. Future research should aim to link these differences in rheological properties to the differences in clinical efficacy seen across these IA-HA products.</p>","PeriodicalId":10443,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"11 ","pages":"1179544117751622"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179544117751622","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179544117751622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Objective: The inconsistent results within the current literature regarding the efficacy of intra-articular-hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been suggested to be due to intrinsic differences between individual HA products. The purpose of this investigation is to define the rheological differences between currently available HA products in the United States at the time of this study for the treatment of knee OA, which will help elaborate on the appropriateness of classifying HA products as a class opposed to as individual agents.

Methods: The rheological parameters for Euflexxa, Orthovisc, Supartz, Monovisc, Synvisc, Synvisc-One, Gel-One, and Hyalgan were obtained with a TA AR 2000 EX Rheometer with a cone-plate geometry (40-mm plate diameter and a 2° cone angle) at room temperature.

Results: The bulk rheological parameters of the different products suggest molecular structures traversing the range of dilute solution (Hyalgan, Supartz), semidilute solution (Euflexxa, Orthovisc), entangled solutions (Monovisc, Synvisc, Synvisc-One), and even gel-like (Gel-One) behavior.

Conclusions: Due to the differences in rheological properties between IA-HA products, the universal assessment of these products as a class may not be appropriate. Instead, it may be more appropriate to assess each product individually. Future research should aim to link these differences in rheological properties to the differences in clinical efficacy seen across these IA-HA products.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

美国市售透明质酸产品治疗骨关节炎膝关节疼痛的流变学特性。
目的:目前文献中关于关节内透明质酸(IA-HA)治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)的疗效的结果不一致,被认为是由于单个HA产品之间的内在差异。本研究的目的是确定在本研究进行时,美国目前可用的HA产品治疗膝关节OA的流变学差异,这将有助于详细说明将HA产品分类为一类而不是单个药物的适当性。方法:用taar 2000 EX锥形板几何(板径40 mm,锥角2°)流变仪测定Euflexxa、Orthovisc、Supartz、Monovisc、Synvisc、Synvisc- one、Gel-One和Hyalgan在室温下的流变参数。结果:不同产品的体积流变参数表明,分子结构跨越了稀溶液(Hyalgan, Supartz),半稀溶液(Euflexxa, Orthovisc),纠缠溶液(Monovisc, Synvisc, Synvisc- one),甚至凝胶(Gel-One)行为的范围。结论:由于IA-HA产品之间流变特性的差异,将这些产品作为一个类别进行普遍评估可能不合适。相反,单独评估每个产品可能更合适。未来的研究应旨在将这些流变学特性的差异与这些IA-HA产品的临床疗效差异联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信