mHealth Interventions To Support Self-Management In HIV: A Systematic Review.

The Open AIDS Journal Pub Date : 2017-11-21 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874613601711010119
Vanessa Cooper, Jane Clatworthy, Jennifer Whetham, EmERGE Consortium
{"title":"mHealth Interventions To Support Self-Management In HIV: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Vanessa Cooper,&nbsp;Jane Clatworthy,&nbsp;Jennifer Whetham,&nbsp;EmERGE Consortium","doi":"10.2174/1874613601711010119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-management is an important aspect of long-term HIV treatment. Mobile technologies offer the potential to efficiently deliver interventions to facilitate HIV self-management. The last comprehensive review of such mHealth interventions was conducted in 2011. Given the rapidly evolving field, a need was identified for an updated review of the literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to describe and evaluate current evidence-based mHealth interventions to support self-management in HIV.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eight online databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Global Health CAB, IEEE explore, Web of Science) were systematically searched for papers describing and evaluating mHealth HIV self-management interventions. Reference lists of relevant papers were also searched. Data on intervention content and evaluation methodology were extracted and appraised by two researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41 papers were identified evaluating 28 interventions. The majority of these interventions (n=20, 71%) had a single focus of either improving adherence (n=16), increasing engagement in care (n=3) or supporting smoking cessation (n=1), while just 8 (29%) were more complex self-management interventions, targeting a range of health-related behaviours. Interventions were predominantly delivered through SMS messaging. They significantly impacted on a range of outcomes including adherence, viral load, mental health and social support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since the last major review of mHealth interventions in HIV, there has been a shift from exploratory acceptability/feasibility studies to impact evaluations. While overall the interventions impacted on a range of outcomes, they were generally limited in scope, failing to encompass many functions identified as desirable by people living with HIV. Participant incentives may limit the generalizability of findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":515834,"journal":{"name":"The Open AIDS Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"119-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730953/pdf/","citationCount":"97","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open AIDS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613601711010119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 97

Abstract

Background: Self-management is an important aspect of long-term HIV treatment. Mobile technologies offer the potential to efficiently deliver interventions to facilitate HIV self-management. The last comprehensive review of such mHealth interventions was conducted in 2011. Given the rapidly evolving field, a need was identified for an updated review of the literature.

Objective: The study aimed to describe and evaluate current evidence-based mHealth interventions to support self-management in HIV.

Method: Eight online databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Global Health CAB, IEEE explore, Web of Science) were systematically searched for papers describing and evaluating mHealth HIV self-management interventions. Reference lists of relevant papers were also searched. Data on intervention content and evaluation methodology were extracted and appraised by two researchers.

Results: 41 papers were identified evaluating 28 interventions. The majority of these interventions (n=20, 71%) had a single focus of either improving adherence (n=16), increasing engagement in care (n=3) or supporting smoking cessation (n=1), while just 8 (29%) were more complex self-management interventions, targeting a range of health-related behaviours. Interventions were predominantly delivered through SMS messaging. They significantly impacted on a range of outcomes including adherence, viral load, mental health and social support.

Conclusion: Since the last major review of mHealth interventions in HIV, there has been a shift from exploratory acceptability/feasibility studies to impact evaluations. While overall the interventions impacted on a range of outcomes, they were generally limited in scope, failing to encompass many functions identified as desirable by people living with HIV. Participant incentives may limit the generalizability of findings.

Abstract Image

支持艾滋病毒自我管理的移动健康干预:一项系统综述。
背景:自我管理是HIV长期治疗的一个重要方面。移动技术提供了有效提供干预措施以促进艾滋病毒自我管理的潜力。上一次对此类移动医疗干预措施进行全面审查是在2011年。鉴于这一迅速发展的领域,需要对文献进行更新审查。目的:本研究旨在描述和评估当前基于证据的移动健康干预措施,以支持艾滋病毒的自我管理。方法:系统检索8个在线数据库(Medline、Scopus、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane、Global Health CAB、IEEE explore、Web of Science),检索描述和评估mHealth HIV自我管理干预措施的论文。检索相关文献的参考文献列表。干预内容和评价方法的数据由两位研究者提取和评价。结果:41篇论文评估了28项干预措施。这些干预措施中的大多数(n=20, 71%)都有一个单一的重点,即提高依从性(n=16),增加参与护理(n=3)或支持戒烟(n=1),而只有8项(29%)是更复杂的自我管理干预措施,针对一系列与健康相关的行为。干预措施主要通过短信传递。它们对一系列结果产生了重大影响,包括依从性、病毒载量、心理健康和社会支持。结论:自上次对移动医疗干预艾滋病毒进行重大审查以来,已经从探索性可接受性/可行性研究转向影响评估。虽然总的来说,这些干预措施对一系列结果产生了影响,但它们的范围通常有限,无法包括艾滋病毒感染者认为需要的许多功能。参与者的动机可能会限制研究结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信