Relapse Risk Assessment for Schizophrenia Patients (RASP): A New Self-Report Screening Tool.

Q4 Medicine
Dawn Velligan, William Carpenter, Heidi C Waters, Nicole M Gerlanc, Susan N Legacy, Charles Ruetsch
{"title":"Relapse Risk Assessment for Schizophrenia Patients (RASP): A New Self-Report Screening Tool.","authors":"Dawn Velligan,&nbsp;William Carpenter,&nbsp;Heidi C Waters,&nbsp;Nicole M Gerlanc,&nbsp;Susan N Legacy,&nbsp;Charles Ruetsch","doi":"10.3371/CSRP.DVWC.111717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Relapse Assessment for Schizophrenia Patients (RASP) was developed as a six-question self-report screener that measures indicators of Increased Anxiety and Social Isolation to assess patient stability and predict imminent relapse. This paper describes the development and psychometric characteristics of the RASP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RASP and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were administered to patients with schizophrenia (n=166) three separate times. Chart data were collected on a subsample of patients (n=81). Psychometric analyses of RASP included tests of reliability, construct validity, and concurrent validity of items. Factors from RASP were correlated with subscales from PANSS (sensitivity to change and criterion validity [agreement between RASP and evidence of relapse]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test-retest reliability returned modest to strong agreement at the item level and strong agreement at the questionnaire level. RASP showed good item response curves and internal consistency for the total instrument and within each of the two subscales (Increased Anxiety and Social Isolation). RASP Total Score and subscales showed good concurrent validity when correlated with PANSS Total Score, Positive, Excitement, and Anxiety subscales. RASP correctly predicted relapse in 67% of cases, with good specificity and negative predictive power and acceptable positive predictive power and sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reliability and validity data presented support the use of RASP in settings where addition of a brief self-report assessment of relapse risk among patients with schizophrenia may be of benefit. Ease of use and scoring, and the ability to administer without clinical supervision allows for routine administration and assessment of relapse risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":40019,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.DVWC.111717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The Relapse Assessment for Schizophrenia Patients (RASP) was developed as a six-question self-report screener that measures indicators of Increased Anxiety and Social Isolation to assess patient stability and predict imminent relapse. This paper describes the development and psychometric characteristics of the RASP.

Methods: The RASP and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were administered to patients with schizophrenia (n=166) three separate times. Chart data were collected on a subsample of patients (n=81). Psychometric analyses of RASP included tests of reliability, construct validity, and concurrent validity of items. Factors from RASP were correlated with subscales from PANSS (sensitivity to change and criterion validity [agreement between RASP and evidence of relapse]).

Results: Test-retest reliability returned modest to strong agreement at the item level and strong agreement at the questionnaire level. RASP showed good item response curves and internal consistency for the total instrument and within each of the two subscales (Increased Anxiety and Social Isolation). RASP Total Score and subscales showed good concurrent validity when correlated with PANSS Total Score, Positive, Excitement, and Anxiety subscales. RASP correctly predicted relapse in 67% of cases, with good specificity and negative predictive power and acceptable positive predictive power and sensitivity.

Conclusions: The reliability and validity data presented support the use of RASP in settings where addition of a brief self-report assessment of relapse risk among patients with schizophrenia may be of benefit. Ease of use and scoring, and the ability to administer without clinical supervision allows for routine administration and assessment of relapse risk.

精神分裂症患者复发风险评估(RASP):一种新的自我报告筛选工具。
目的:精神分裂症患者复发评估(RASP)是一种由六个问题组成的自我报告筛选方法,用于测量焦虑和社会隔离增加的指标,以评估患者的稳定性并预测即将复发。本文介绍了RASP的发展和心理测量学特征。方法:对166例精神分裂症患者分别进行3次RASP和PANSS评分。收集患者亚样本(n=81)的图表数据。RASP的心理测量分析包括信度、构念效度和项目并发效度的测试。RASP的因素与PANSS的子量表(对变化的敏感性和标准效度[RASP与复发证据之间的一致性])相关。结果:重测信度在项目水平和问卷水平上回归中等至强一致。RASP在总量表和两个子量表(增加焦虑和社会隔离)内均显示出良好的项目反应曲线和内部一致性。RASP总分和各分量表与PANSS总分、积极、兴奋和焦虑分量表的并发效度均较好。RASP正确预测67%的病例复发,具有良好的特异性和阴性预测能力,阳性预测能力和敏感性可接受。结论:所提供的信度和效度数据支持在精神分裂症患者中添加简短的复发风险自我报告评估可能有益的情况下使用RASP。易于使用和评分,无需临床监督即可进行常规给药和复发风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The vision of the exciting new peer-reviewed quarterly publication Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses (CS) is to provide psychiatrists and other healthcare professionals with the latest research and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia and related psychoses. CS is a practice-oriented publication focused exclusively on the newest research findings, guidelines, treatment protocols, and clinical trials relevant to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信