Efficacy of Intra-articular Injection of a Newly Developed Plasma Rich in Growth Factor (PRGF) Versus Hyaluronic Acid on Pain and Function of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat, Seyed Mansoor Rayegani, Azadeh Gharooee Ahangar, Porya Hassan Abadi, Parviz Mojgani, Omid Gharooi Ahangar
{"title":"Efficacy of Intra-articular Injection of a Newly Developed Plasma Rich in Growth Factor (PRGF) Versus Hyaluronic Acid on Pain and Function of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat,&nbsp;Seyed Mansoor Rayegani,&nbsp;Azadeh Gharooee Ahangar,&nbsp;Porya Hassan Abadi,&nbsp;Parviz Mojgani,&nbsp;Omid Gharooi Ahangar","doi":"10.1177/1179544117733452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of a newly developed plasma rich in growth factor (PRGF) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) on pain and function of patients with knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-blinded randomized clinical trial, patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of knee were assigned to receive 2 intra-articular injections of our newly developed PRGF in 3 weeks or 3 weekly injections of HA. Our primary outcome was the mean change from baseline until 2 and 6 months post intervention in scores of visual analog scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Lequesne index. We used analysis of variance for repeated-measures statistical test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 patients entered final analysis. The mean age of patients was 58.2 ± 7.41 years and 81.2% were women. In particular, total WOMAC index decreased from 42.9 ± 13.51 to 26.8 ± 13.45 and 24.4 ± 16.54 at 2 and 6 months in the newly developed PRGF group (within subjects <i>P</i> = .001), and from 38.8 ± 12.62 to 27.8 ± 11.01 and 27.4 ± 11.38 at 2 and 6 months in the HA group (within subjects <i>P</i> = .001), respectively (between subjects <i>P</i> = .631). There was no significant difference between PRGF and HA groups in patients' satisfaction and minor complications of injection, whereas patients in HA group reported significantly lower injection-induced pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 6 months follow up, our newly developed PRGF and HA, both are effective options to decrease pain and improvement of function in patients with symptomatic mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10443,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179544117733452","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179544117733452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Background and objectives: Knee osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of a newly developed plasma rich in growth factor (PRGF) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) on pain and function of patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: In this single-blinded randomized clinical trial, patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of knee were assigned to receive 2 intra-articular injections of our newly developed PRGF in 3 weeks or 3 weekly injections of HA. Our primary outcome was the mean change from baseline until 2 and 6 months post intervention in scores of visual analog scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Lequesne index. We used analysis of variance for repeated-measures statistical test.

Results: A total of 69 patients entered final analysis. The mean age of patients was 58.2 ± 7.41 years and 81.2% were women. In particular, total WOMAC index decreased from 42.9 ± 13.51 to 26.8 ± 13.45 and 24.4 ± 16.54 at 2 and 6 months in the newly developed PRGF group (within subjects P = .001), and from 38.8 ± 12.62 to 27.8 ± 11.01 and 27.4 ± 11.38 at 2 and 6 months in the HA group (within subjects P = .001), respectively (between subjects P = .631). There was no significant difference between PRGF and HA groups in patients' satisfaction and minor complications of injection, whereas patients in HA group reported significantly lower injection-induced pain.

Conclusions: In 6 months follow up, our newly developed PRGF and HA, both are effective options to decrease pain and improvement of function in patients with symptomatic mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

关节内注射新开发的富生长因子血浆(PRGF)与透明质酸对膝关节骨关节炎患者疼痛和功能的疗效:一项单盲随机临床试验
背景与目的:膝关节骨性关节炎是最常见的关节疾病。我们旨在比较关节内注射一种新开发的富含生长因子(PRGF)的血浆与透明质酸(HA)对膝关节骨关节炎患者疼痛和功能的疗效和安全性。方法:在这项单盲随机临床试验中,有症状的膝关节骨性关节炎患者被分配接受2次关节内注射我们新开发的PRGF在3周或3周注射HA。我们的主要结局是干预后2个月和6个月的视觉模拟量表评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和Lequesne指数的平均变化。重复测量量统计检验采用方差分析。结果:69例患者进入最终分析。患者平均年龄为58.2±7.41岁,女性占81.2%。特别是,新发展的PRGF组总WOMAC指数在2个月和6个月时分别从42.9±13.51下降到26.8±13.45和24.4±16.54(受试者内P = 0.001), HA组在2和6个月时分别从38.8±12.62下降到27.8±11.01和27.4±11.38(受试者内P = 0.001)(受试者间P = 0.631)。PRGF组和HA组在患者满意度和轻微注射并发症方面无显著差异,而HA组患者报告的注射性疼痛明显降低。结论:在6个月的随访中,我们新开发的PRGF和HA都是减轻症状性轻中度膝关节骨性关节炎患者疼痛和改善功能的有效选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信