Racial/Ethnic Health Disparities Among Rural Adults - United States, 2012-2015.

IF 37.3 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Cara V James, Ramal Moonesinghe, Shondelle M Wilson-Frederick, Jeffrey E Hall, Ana Penman-Aguilar, Karen Bouye
{"title":"Racial/Ethnic Health Disparities Among Rural Adults - United States, 2012-2015.","authors":"Cara V James, Ramal Moonesinghe, Shondelle M Wilson-Frederick, Jeffrey E Hall, Ana Penman-Aguilar, Karen Bouye","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.ss6623a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem/condition: </strong>Rural communities often have worse health outcomes, have less access to care, and are less diverse than urban communities. Much of the research on rural health disparities examines disparities between rural and urban communities, with fewer studies on disparities within rural communities. This report provides an overview of racial/ethnic health disparities for selected indicators in rural areas of the United States.</p><p><strong>Reporting period: </strong>2012-2015.</p><p><strong>Description of system: </strong>Self-reported data from the 2012-2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were pooled to evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in health, access to care, and health-related behaviors among rural residents in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Using the National Center for Health Statistics 2013 Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties to assess rurality, this analysis focused on adults living in noncore (rural) counties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Racial/ethnic minorities who lived in rural areas were younger (more often in the youngest age group) than non-Hispanic whites. Except for Asians and Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders (combined in the analysis), more racial/ethnic minorities (compared with non-Hispanic whites) reported their health as fair or poor, that they had obesity, and that they were unable to see a physician in the past 12 months because of cost. All racial/ethnic minority populations were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to report having a personal health care provider. Non-Hispanic whites had the highest estimated prevalence of binge drinking in the past 30 days.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Although persons in rural communities often have worse health outcomes and less access to health care than those in urban communities, rural racial/ethnic minority populations have substantial health, access to care, and lifestyle challenges that can be overlooked when considering aggregated population data. This study revealed difficulties among non-Hispanic whites as well, primarily related to health-related risk behaviors. Across each population, the challenges vary.</p><p><strong>Public health action: </strong>Stratifying data by different demographics, using community health needs assessments, and adopting and implementing the National Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services Standards can help rural communities identify disparities and develop effective initiatives to eliminate them, which aligns with a Healthy People 2020 overarching goal: achieving health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48549,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Surveillance Summaries","volume":"66 23","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":37.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829953/pdf/","citationCount":"198","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mmwr Surveillance Summaries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6623a1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 198

Abstract

Problem/condition: Rural communities often have worse health outcomes, have less access to care, and are less diverse than urban communities. Much of the research on rural health disparities examines disparities between rural and urban communities, with fewer studies on disparities within rural communities. This report provides an overview of racial/ethnic health disparities for selected indicators in rural areas of the United States.

Reporting period: 2012-2015.

Description of system: Self-reported data from the 2012-2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were pooled to evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in health, access to care, and health-related behaviors among rural residents in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Using the National Center for Health Statistics 2013 Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties to assess rurality, this analysis focused on adults living in noncore (rural) counties.

Results: Racial/ethnic minorities who lived in rural areas were younger (more often in the youngest age group) than non-Hispanic whites. Except for Asians and Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders (combined in the analysis), more racial/ethnic minorities (compared with non-Hispanic whites) reported their health as fair or poor, that they had obesity, and that they were unable to see a physician in the past 12 months because of cost. All racial/ethnic minority populations were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to report having a personal health care provider. Non-Hispanic whites had the highest estimated prevalence of binge drinking in the past 30 days.

Interpretation: Although persons in rural communities often have worse health outcomes and less access to health care than those in urban communities, rural racial/ethnic minority populations have substantial health, access to care, and lifestyle challenges that can be overlooked when considering aggregated population data. This study revealed difficulties among non-Hispanic whites as well, primarily related to health-related risk behaviors. Across each population, the challenges vary.

Public health action: Stratifying data by different demographics, using community health needs assessments, and adopting and implementing the National Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services Standards can help rural communities identify disparities and develop effective initiatives to eliminate them, which aligns with a Healthy People 2020 overarching goal: achieving health equity.

2012-2015年美国农村成年人的种族/族裔健康差异
问题/状况:农村社区的健康状况往往较差,获得保健的机会较少,而且多样性不如城市社区。关于农村保健差距的研究大多考察了农村和城市社区之间的差距,对农村社区内部差距的研究较少。本报告概述了美国农村地区某些指标的种族/族裔健康差异。报告期:2012-2015年。系统描述:汇总2012-2015年行为风险因素监测系统的自我报告数据,以评估所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区农村居民在健康、获得护理和健康相关行为方面的种族/民族差异。使用国家卫生统计中心2013年城乡分类方案对乡村性进行评估,本分析侧重于生活在非核心(农村)县的成年人。结果:居住在农村地区的少数种族/民族比非西班牙裔白人更年轻(更常出现在最年轻的年龄组)。除了亚洲人、夏威夷原住民和其他太平洋岛民(在分析中合并)之外,更多的种族/少数民族(与非西班牙裔白人相比)报告他们的健康状况一般或较差,他们肥胖,并且他们在过去12个月里因为费用原因无法看医生。与非西班牙裔白人相比,所有种族/少数民族人口报告拥有个人医疗保健提供者的可能性都较低。在过去的30天里,非西班牙裔白人的酗酒率最高。解释:尽管农村社区的人往往比城市社区的人有更差的健康结果和更少的获得医疗保健的机会,但在考虑汇总人口数据时,农村种族/少数民族人口在健康、获得医疗保健和生活方式方面存在重大挑战,这些挑战可能被忽视。这项研究也揭示了非西班牙裔白人的困难,主要与健康相关的风险行为有关。不同人口面临的挑战各不相同。公共卫生行动:根据不同的人口统计数据进行分层,利用社区卫生需求评估,并通过和实施《国家文化和语言上适当的服务标准》,可帮助农村社区发现差距,并制定有效举措消除差距,这符合《健康人2020》的总体目标:实现卫生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mmwr Surveillance Summaries
Mmwr Surveillance Summaries PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
60.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Series, produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is commonly referred to as "the voice of CDC." Serving as the primary outlet for timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and practical public health information and recommendations, the MMWR is a crucial publication. Its readership primarily includes physicians, nurses, public health practitioners, epidemiologists, scientists, researchers, educators, and laboratorians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信