A Rights-based Approach to Information in Humanitarian Assistance.

Daniel P Scarnecchia, Nathaniel A Raymond, Faine Greenwood, Caitlin Howarth, Danielle N Poole
{"title":"A Rights-based Approach to Information in Humanitarian Assistance.","authors":"Daniel P Scarnecchia,&nbsp;Nathaniel A Raymond,&nbsp;Faine Greenwood,&nbsp;Caitlin Howarth,&nbsp;Danielle N Poole","doi":"10.1371/currents.dis.dd709e442c659e97e2583e0a9986b668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crisis-affected populations and humanitarian aid providers are both becoming increasingly reliant on information and communications technology (ICTs) for finding and provisioning aid. This is exposing critical, unaddressed gaps in the legal and ethical frameworks that traditionally defined and governed the professional conduct of humanitarian action. The most acute of these gaps is a lack of clarity about what human rights people have regarding information in disaster, and the corresponding obligations incumbent upon governments and aid providers.  This need is lent urgency by emerging evidence demonstrating that the use of these technologies in crisis response may be, in some cases, causing harm to the very populations they intend to serve.  Preventing and mitigating these harms, while also working to responsibly ensure access to the benefits of information during crises, requires a rights-based framework to guide humanitarian operations. In this brief report, we provide a commentary that accompanies our report, the Signal Code: A Human Rights Approach to Information During Crisis, where we have identified five rights pertaining to the use of information and data during crisis which are grounded in current international human rights and customary law. It is our belief that the continued relevance of the humanitarian project, as it grows increasingly dependent on the use of data and ICTs, urgently requires a discussion of these rights and corresponding obligations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74464,"journal":{"name":"PLoS currents","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693342/pdf/","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.dd709e442c659e97e2583e0a9986b668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Crisis-affected populations and humanitarian aid providers are both becoming increasingly reliant on information and communications technology (ICTs) for finding and provisioning aid. This is exposing critical, unaddressed gaps in the legal and ethical frameworks that traditionally defined and governed the professional conduct of humanitarian action. The most acute of these gaps is a lack of clarity about what human rights people have regarding information in disaster, and the corresponding obligations incumbent upon governments and aid providers.  This need is lent urgency by emerging evidence demonstrating that the use of these technologies in crisis response may be, in some cases, causing harm to the very populations they intend to serve.  Preventing and mitigating these harms, while also working to responsibly ensure access to the benefits of information during crises, requires a rights-based framework to guide humanitarian operations. In this brief report, we provide a commentary that accompanies our report, the Signal Code: A Human Rights Approach to Information During Crisis, where we have identified five rights pertaining to the use of information and data during crisis which are grounded in current international human rights and customary law. It is our belief that the continued relevance of the humanitarian project, as it grows increasingly dependent on the use of data and ICTs, urgently requires a discussion of these rights and corresponding obligations.

人道主义援助中基于权利的信息处理方法。
受危机影响的民众和人道主义援助提供者都越来越依赖信息通信技术(ict)来寻找和提供援助。这暴露了传统上界定和管理人道主义行动专业行为的法律和道德框架中尚未解决的重大漏洞。这些差距中最严重的是,不清楚人权人士对灾难中的信息有哪些了解,以及政府和援助提供者应承担的相应义务。新出现的证据表明,在某些情况下,在危机应对中使用这些技术可能会对它们打算服务的人群造成伤害,这使得这种需求变得更加迫切。预防和减轻这些危害,同时负责任地确保在危机期间获得信息的好处,需要一个以权利为基础的框架来指导人道主义行动。在这份简短的报告中,我们为我们的报告《信号代码:危机期间信息的人权方法》提供了一份评论,其中我们确定了与危机期间使用信息和数据有关的五项权利,这些权利以当前的国际人权和习惯法为基础。我们认为,随着人道主义项目越来越依赖于数据和信息通信技术的使用,它的持续相关性迫切需要讨论这些权利和相应的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信