Impact of Modified Transesophageal Echocardiography on Mortality and Stroke after Cardiac Surgery: A Large Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Journal of Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-09-11 DOI:10.1155/2017/1857069
Wouter W Jansen Klomp, Carl G M Moons, Arno P Nierich, George J Brandon Bravo Bruinsma, Arnoud W J Van't Hof, Jan G Grandjean, Linda M Peelen
{"title":"Impact of Modified Transesophageal Echocardiography on Mortality and Stroke after Cardiac Surgery: A Large Cohort Study.","authors":"Wouter W Jansen Klomp,&nbsp;Carl G M Moons,&nbsp;Arno P Nierich,&nbsp;George J Brandon Bravo Bruinsma,&nbsp;Arnoud W J Van't Hof,&nbsp;Jan G Grandjean,&nbsp;Linda M Peelen","doi":"10.1155/2017/1857069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of perioperative screening with modified transesophageal echocardiography (A-View method). We compared, in consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2014, 30-day mortality and in-hospital stroke incidence, operated either with perioperative modified TEE screening (intervention group) or only with conventional TEE screening (control group). Of the 8,605 study patients, modified TEE was applied in 1,391 patients (16.2%). Patients in the intervention group were on average older (71 versus 68 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and more often females (31.0% versus 28.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and had a higher predicted mortality (EuroSCORE I: 5.9% versus 4.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The observed 30-day mortality was 2.2% and 2.5% in both groups, respectively, with multivariable and propensity-score adjusted relative risks (RRs) of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.50-1.00, <i>p</i> = 0.05) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.45-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.04). In-hospital stroke was 2.9% and 2.1% in both groups, respectively, with adjusted RRs of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.73-1.45) and 1.01 (95% CI: 0.71-1.43). In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, use of perioperative screening for aortic atherosclerosis with modified TEE was associated with lower postoperative mortality, but not stroke, as compared to patients operated on without such screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":14448,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":"2017 ","pages":"1857069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/1857069","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1857069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of perioperative screening with modified transesophageal echocardiography (A-View method). We compared, in consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2014, 30-day mortality and in-hospital stroke incidence, operated either with perioperative modified TEE screening (intervention group) or only with conventional TEE screening (control group). Of the 8,605 study patients, modified TEE was applied in 1,391 patients (16.2%). Patients in the intervention group were on average older (71 versus 68 years, p < 0.001) and more often females (31.0% versus 28.0%, p < 0.001) and had a higher predicted mortality (EuroSCORE I: 5.9% versus 4.0%, p < 0.001). The observed 30-day mortality was 2.2% and 2.5% in both groups, respectively, with multivariable and propensity-score adjusted relative risks (RRs) of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.50-1.00, p = 0.05) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.45-0.98, p = 0.04). In-hospital stroke was 2.9% and 2.1% in both groups, respectively, with adjusted RRs of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.73-1.45) and 1.01 (95% CI: 0.71-1.43). In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, use of perioperative screening for aortic atherosclerosis with modified TEE was associated with lower postoperative mortality, but not stroke, as compared to patients operated on without such screening.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改良的经食管超声心动图对心脏手术后死亡率和卒中的影响:一项大型队列研究。
本研究的目的是探讨改良经食管超声心动图(A-View法)围手术期筛查的影响。我们比较了2006年至2014年间连续接受心脏手术的患者的30天死亡率和住院卒中发生率,这些患者采用围手术期改良TEE筛查(干预组)或仅采用常规TEE筛查(对照组)。在8605例研究患者中,改良TEE应用于1391例患者(16.2%)。干预组患者平均年龄较大(71岁对68岁,p < 0.001),女性患者较多(31.0%对28.0%,p < 0.001),预测死亡率较高(EuroSCORE I: 5.9%对4.0%,p < 0.001)。两组观察到的30天死亡率分别为2.2%和2.5%,多变量和倾向评分调整后的相对危险度(RRs)分别为0.70 (95% CI: 0.50-1.00, p = 0.05)和0.67 (95% CI: 0.45-0.98, p = 0.04)。两组住院卒中发生率分别为2.9%和2.1%,调整后的相对危险度分别为1.03 (95% CI: 0.73-1.45)和1.01 (95% CI: 0.71-1.43)。在接受心脏手术的患者中,与未进行此类筛查的患者相比,采用改良TEE进行主动脉粥样硬化围手术期筛查与术后死亡率降低相关,但与卒中无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Vascular Medicine
International Journal of Vascular Medicine PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信