Rural and Urban Differences in Passenger-Vehicle-Occupant Deaths and Seat Belt Use Among Adults - United States, 2014.

IF 37.3 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laurie F Beck, Jonathan Downs, Mark R Stevens, Erin K Sauber-Schatz
{"title":"Rural and Urban Differences in Passenger-Vehicle-Occupant Deaths and Seat Belt Use Among Adults - United States, 2014.","authors":"Laurie F Beck,&nbsp;Jonathan Downs,&nbsp;Mark R Stevens,&nbsp;Erin K Sauber-Schatz","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.ss6617a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem/condition: </strong>Motor-vehicle crashes are a leading cause of death in the United States. Compared with urban residents, rural residents are at an increased risk for death from crashes and are less likely to wear seat belts. These differences have not been well described by levels of rurality.</p><p><strong>Reporting period: </strong>2014.</p><p><strong>Description of systems: </strong>Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) were used to identify passenger-vehicle-occupant deaths from motor-vehicle crashes and estimate the prevalence of seat belt use. FARS, a census of U.S. motor-vehicle crashes involving one or more deaths, was used to identify passenger-vehicle-occupant deaths among adults aged ≥18 years. Passenger-vehicle occupants were defined as persons driving or riding in passenger cars, light trucks, vans, or sport utility vehicles. Death rates per 100,000 population, age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population and the proportion of occupants who were unrestrained at the time of the fatal crash, were calculated. BRFSS, an annual, state-based, random-digit-dialed telephone survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. civilian population aged ≥18 years, was used to estimate prevalence of seat belt use. FARS and BRFSS data were analyzed by a six-level rural-urban designation, based on the U.S. Department of Agriculture 2013 rural-urban continuum codes, and stratified by census region and type of state seat belt enforcement law (primary or secondary).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within each census region, age-adjusted passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates per 100,000 population increased with increasing rurality, from the most urban to the most rural counties: South, 6.8 to 29.2; Midwest, 5.3 to 25.8; West, 3.9 to 40.0; and Northeast, 3.5 to 10.8. (For the Northeast, data for the most rural counties were not reported because of suppression criteria; comparison is for the most urban to the second-most rural counties.) Similarly, the proportion of occupants who were unrestrained at the time of the fatal crash increased as rurality increased. Self-reported seat belt use in the United States decreased with increasing rurality, ranging from 88.8% in the most urban counties to 74.7% in the most rural counties. Similar differences in age-adjusted death rates and seat belt use were observed in states with primary and secondary seat belt enforcement laws.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Rurality was associated with higher age-adjusted passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates, a higher proportion of unrestrained passenger-vehicle-occupant deaths, and lower seat belt use among adults in all census regions and regardless of state seat belt enforcement type.</p><p><strong>Public health actions: </strong>Seat belt use decreases and age-adjusted passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates increase with increasing levels of rurality. Improving seat belt use remains a critical strategy to reduce crash-related deaths in the United States, especially in rural areas where seat belt use is lower and age-adjusted death rates are higher than in urban areas. States and communities can consider using evidence-based interventions to reduce rural-urban disparities in seat belt use and passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":48549,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Surveillance Summaries","volume":"66 17","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":37.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829699/pdf/","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mmwr Surveillance Summaries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6617a1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Problem/condition: Motor-vehicle crashes are a leading cause of death in the United States. Compared with urban residents, rural residents are at an increased risk for death from crashes and are less likely to wear seat belts. These differences have not been well described by levels of rurality.

Reporting period: 2014.

Description of systems: Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) were used to identify passenger-vehicle-occupant deaths from motor-vehicle crashes and estimate the prevalence of seat belt use. FARS, a census of U.S. motor-vehicle crashes involving one or more deaths, was used to identify passenger-vehicle-occupant deaths among adults aged ≥18 years. Passenger-vehicle occupants were defined as persons driving or riding in passenger cars, light trucks, vans, or sport utility vehicles. Death rates per 100,000 population, age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population and the proportion of occupants who were unrestrained at the time of the fatal crash, were calculated. BRFSS, an annual, state-based, random-digit-dialed telephone survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. civilian population aged ≥18 years, was used to estimate prevalence of seat belt use. FARS and BRFSS data were analyzed by a six-level rural-urban designation, based on the U.S. Department of Agriculture 2013 rural-urban continuum codes, and stratified by census region and type of state seat belt enforcement law (primary or secondary).

Results: Within each census region, age-adjusted passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates per 100,000 population increased with increasing rurality, from the most urban to the most rural counties: South, 6.8 to 29.2; Midwest, 5.3 to 25.8; West, 3.9 to 40.0; and Northeast, 3.5 to 10.8. (For the Northeast, data for the most rural counties were not reported because of suppression criteria; comparison is for the most urban to the second-most rural counties.) Similarly, the proportion of occupants who were unrestrained at the time of the fatal crash increased as rurality increased. Self-reported seat belt use in the United States decreased with increasing rurality, ranging from 88.8% in the most urban counties to 74.7% in the most rural counties. Similar differences in age-adjusted death rates and seat belt use were observed in states with primary and secondary seat belt enforcement laws.

Interpretation: Rurality was associated with higher age-adjusted passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates, a higher proportion of unrestrained passenger-vehicle-occupant deaths, and lower seat belt use among adults in all census regions and regardless of state seat belt enforcement type.

Public health actions: Seat belt use decreases and age-adjusted passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates increase with increasing levels of rurality. Improving seat belt use remains a critical strategy to reduce crash-related deaths in the United States, especially in rural areas where seat belt use is lower and age-adjusted death rates are higher than in urban areas. States and communities can consider using evidence-based interventions to reduce rural-urban disparities in seat belt use and passenger-vehicle-occupant death rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2014年美国城乡乘客-车辆乘员死亡和安全带使用的差异。
问题/状况:在美国,车祸是导致死亡的主要原因。与城市居民相比,农村居民死于车祸的风险更高,而且不太可能系安全带。这些差异并没有很好地描述为农村水平。报告期间:2014年。系统描述:使用来自死亡分析报告系统(FARS)和行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)的数据来确定机动车碰撞造成的乘客-车辆-乘员死亡人数,并估计安全带使用的流行程度。FARS是一项涉及一人或多人死亡的美国机动车碰撞普查,用于确定年龄≥18岁的成人中乘用车乘客的死亡情况。乘用车乘员被定义为驾驶或乘坐乘用车、轻型卡车、货车或运动型多用途车的人。计算了每10万人的死亡率,年龄调整到2000年美国标准人口,以及致命车祸发生时不受约束的乘客比例。BRFSS是一项年度、基于州、随机数字拨号的电话调查,调查对象为年龄≥18岁的非收容美国平民,用于估计安全带使用的流行程度。FARS和BRFSS数据根据美国农业部2013年农村-城市连续代码,按人口普查地区和州安全带执法类型(主要或次要)进行分层,通过六个级别的农村-城市指定进行分析。结果:在每个人口普查区域内,每10万人口中年龄调整后的乘用车死亡率随着农村人口的增加而增加,从最城市的县到最农村的县:南部,6.8到29.2;中西部地区,5.3 - 25.8;西部:3.9 - 40.0;东北部,3.5到10.8。(在东北,由于压制标准,大多数农村县的数据没有报告;比较的是城市最多的县和农村第二多的县。)同样,随着农村人口的增加,发生致命车祸时不受约束的乘客比例也在增加。在美国,自我报告的安全带使用率随着农村地区的增加而下降,从大多数城市县的88.8%到大多数农村县的74.7%不等。在有一级和二级安全带执法法的州,也观察到年龄调整死亡率和安全带使用方面的类似差异。解释:在所有人口普查地区,无论州系安全带的实施类型如何,农村地区与较高的年龄调整后的乘客-车辆乘员死亡率、较高的无约束乘客-车辆乘员死亡率以及较低的安全带使用率有关。公共卫生行动:随着农村水平的提高,安全带的使用减少,按年龄调整的乘用车人员死亡率上升。在美国,改善安全带的使用仍然是减少与车祸有关的死亡的一项关键战略,特别是在安全带使用率较低且年龄调整死亡率高于城市地区的农村地区。各州和社区可考虑采用循证干预措施,缩小城乡在安全带使用和乘客-车辆-乘员死亡率方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mmwr Surveillance Summaries
Mmwr Surveillance Summaries PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
60.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Series, produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is commonly referred to as "the voice of CDC." Serving as the primary outlet for timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and practical public health information and recommendations, the MMWR is a crucial publication. Its readership primarily includes physicians, nurses, public health practitioners, epidemiologists, scientists, researchers, educators, and laboratorians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信