High Burden of Antimicrobial Resistance among Bacteria Causing Pyogenic Wound Infections at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.

IF 1.1 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Pathogens Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-08-28 DOI:10.1155/2017/9458218
Basista Prasad Rijal, Deepa Satyal, Narayan Prasad Parajuli
{"title":"High Burden of Antimicrobial Resistance among Bacteria Causing Pyogenic Wound Infections at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.","authors":"Basista Prasad Rijal,&nbsp;Deepa Satyal,&nbsp;Narayan Prasad Parajuli","doi":"10.1155/2017/9458218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pyogenic wound infections are one of the most common clinical entities caused and aggravated by the invasion of pathogenic organisms. Prompt and aggressive antimicrobial therapy is needed to reduce the burden and complications associated with these infections. In this study, we intended to investigate the common pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the pyogenic wound infections at a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. A laboratory based cross-sectional study was carried out among the pyogenic clinical specimens of the patients visiting Manmohan Memorial Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Processing of clinical specimens and isolation and identification of bacterial pathogens were carried out using standard microbiological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistant profiles were determined by following the standard guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). About 65% of the clinical specimens were positive for the bacterial growth and Gram positive bacteria (57.4%) were the leading pathogens among pyogenic wound infections. <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (412, 49.28%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (136, 16.27%), <i>Klebsiella</i> spp. (88, 10.53%), and <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. (44, 5.26%) were the common pathogens isolated. High level of drug resistance was observed among both Gram positive bacteria (51.9%) and Gram negative bacteria (48.7%). Gram positive isolates were resistant to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, erythromycin, and cloxacillin. Gram negative isolates were resistant to cephalosporins but were well susceptible to amikacin and imipenem. Pyogenic wound infections are common in our hospital and majority of them were associated with multidrug resistant bacteria. The detailed workup of the prevalent pathogens present in infected wounds and their resistance pattern is clearly pertinent to choosing the adequate treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathogens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/9458218","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9458218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Pyogenic wound infections are one of the most common clinical entities caused and aggravated by the invasion of pathogenic organisms. Prompt and aggressive antimicrobial therapy is needed to reduce the burden and complications associated with these infections. In this study, we intended to investigate the common pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the pyogenic wound infections at a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. A laboratory based cross-sectional study was carried out among the pyogenic clinical specimens of the patients visiting Manmohan Memorial Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Processing of clinical specimens and isolation and identification of bacterial pathogens were carried out using standard microbiological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistant profiles were determined by following the standard guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). About 65% of the clinical specimens were positive for the bacterial growth and Gram positive bacteria (57.4%) were the leading pathogens among pyogenic wound infections. Staphylococcus aureus (412, 49.28%), Escherichia coli (136, 16.27%), Klebsiella spp. (88, 10.53%), and Pseudomonas spp. (44, 5.26%) were the common pathogens isolated. High level of drug resistance was observed among both Gram positive bacteria (51.9%) and Gram negative bacteria (48.7%). Gram positive isolates were resistant to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, erythromycin, and cloxacillin. Gram negative isolates were resistant to cephalosporins but were well susceptible to amikacin and imipenem. Pyogenic wound infections are common in our hospital and majority of them were associated with multidrug resistant bacteria. The detailed workup of the prevalent pathogens present in infected wounds and their resistance pattern is clearly pertinent to choosing the adequate treatment.

在尼泊尔加德满都的一家三级护理医院,引起化脓性伤口感染的细菌的高抗菌素耐药性负担。
化脓性伤口感染是由病原菌侵入引起和加重的最常见的临床疾病之一。需要及时和积极的抗微生物治疗,以减少与这些感染相关的负担和并发症。在这项研究中,我们打算调查尼泊尔加德满都一家三级保健医院化脓性伤口感染的常见病原体及其抗菌药物敏感性模式。在尼泊尔加德满都曼莫汉纪念教学医院就诊的患者的化脓性临床标本中进行了基于实验室的横断面研究。临床标本处理及病原菌分离鉴定采用标准微生物学方法进行。按照临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的标准指南确定抗菌素敏感性和耐药谱。65%的临床标本细菌生长呈阳性,革兰氏阳性菌(57.4%)是化脓性伤口感染的主要病原菌。金黄色葡萄球菌(412株,49.28%)、大肠杆菌(136株,16.27%)、克雷伯氏菌(88株,10.53%)和假单胞菌(44株,5.26%)是常见的病原菌。革兰氏阳性菌(51.9%)和革兰氏阴性菌(48.7%)耐药水平均较高。革兰氏阳性分离株对氨苄西林、环丙沙星、复方新诺明、红霉素和氯西林耐药。革兰氏阴性菌株对头孢菌素耐药,但对阿米卡星和亚胺培南敏感。化脓性伤口感染在我院较为常见,多数与多重耐药菌有关。对感染伤口中普遍存在的病原体及其耐药模式的详细检查显然与选择适当的治疗有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathogens
Journal of Pathogens MICROBIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信