Contemporary HIV/AIDS research: Insights from knowledge management theory.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Chris William Callaghan
{"title":"Contemporary HIV/AIDS research: Insights from knowledge management theory.","authors":"Chris William Callaghan","doi":"10.1080/17290376.2017.1375426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knowledge management as a field is concerned with the management of knowledge, including the management of knowledge in research processes. Knowledge management theory has the potential to support research into problems such as HIV, antibiotic resistance and others, particularly in terms of aspects of scientific research related to the contribution of social science. To date, however, these challenges remain with us, and theoretical contributions that can complement natural science efforts to eradicate these problems are needed. This paper seeks to offer a theoretical contribution grounded in Kuhn's paradigm theory of innovation, and in the argument by Lakatos that scientific research can be fundamentally non-innovative, which suggests that social science aspects of knowledge creation may hold the key to more effective biomedical innovation. Given the consequences of ongoing and emerging global crises, and the failure of knowledge systems of scientific research to solve such problems outright, this paper provides a review of theory and literature arguing for a new paradigm in scientific research, based on the development of global systems to maximise research collaborations. A global systems approach effectively includes social science theory development as an important complement to the natural sciences research process. Arguably, information technology and social media technology have developed to the point at which solutions to knowledge aggregation challenges can enable solutions to knowledge problems on a scale hitherto unimaginable. Expert and non-expert crowdsourced inputs can enable problem-solving through exponentially increasing problem-solving inputs, using the 'crowd,' thereby increasing collaborations dramatically. It is argued that these developments herald a new era of participatory research, or a democratisation of research, which offers new hope for solving global social problems. This paper seeks to contribute to this end, and to the recognition of the important role of social theory in the scientific research process.</p>","PeriodicalId":45939,"journal":{"name":"Sahara J-Journal of Social Aspects of Hiv-Aids","volume":"14 1","pages":"53-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17290376.2017.1375426","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sahara J-Journal of Social Aspects of Hiv-Aids","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17290376.2017.1375426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Knowledge management as a field is concerned with the management of knowledge, including the management of knowledge in research processes. Knowledge management theory has the potential to support research into problems such as HIV, antibiotic resistance and others, particularly in terms of aspects of scientific research related to the contribution of social science. To date, however, these challenges remain with us, and theoretical contributions that can complement natural science efforts to eradicate these problems are needed. This paper seeks to offer a theoretical contribution grounded in Kuhn's paradigm theory of innovation, and in the argument by Lakatos that scientific research can be fundamentally non-innovative, which suggests that social science aspects of knowledge creation may hold the key to more effective biomedical innovation. Given the consequences of ongoing and emerging global crises, and the failure of knowledge systems of scientific research to solve such problems outright, this paper provides a review of theory and literature arguing for a new paradigm in scientific research, based on the development of global systems to maximise research collaborations. A global systems approach effectively includes social science theory development as an important complement to the natural sciences research process. Arguably, information technology and social media technology have developed to the point at which solutions to knowledge aggregation challenges can enable solutions to knowledge problems on a scale hitherto unimaginable. Expert and non-expert crowdsourced inputs can enable problem-solving through exponentially increasing problem-solving inputs, using the 'crowd,' thereby increasing collaborations dramatically. It is argued that these developments herald a new era of participatory research, or a democratisation of research, which offers new hope for solving global social problems. This paper seeks to contribute to this end, and to the recognition of the important role of social theory in the scientific research process.

Abstract Image

当代艾滋病研究:知识管理理论的启示。
知识管理作为一个涉及知识管理的领域,包括研究过程中的知识管理。知识管理理论有可能支持对艾滋病毒、抗生素耐药性等问题的研究,特别是在与社会科学贡献有关的科学研究方面。然而,到目前为止,这些挑战仍然伴随着我们,需要能够补充自然科学努力以消除这些问题的理论贡献。本文试图在库恩创新范式理论和拉卡托斯关于科学研究可以从根本上非创新的论点的基础上提供理论贡献,这表明知识创造的社会科学方面可能是更有效的生物医学创新的关键。考虑到持续和新出现的全球危机的后果,以及科学研究的知识体系未能彻底解决这些问题,本文对理论和文献进行了综述,主张在全球体系发展的基础上,建立一种新的科学研究范式,以最大限度地扩大研究合作。全球系统方法有效地包括社会科学理论发展,作为对自然科学研究过程的重要补充。可以说,信息技术和社交媒体技术已经发展到可以解决知识聚合挑战的程度,从而能够解决迄今为止难以想象的知识问题。专家和非专家众包输入可以通过使用“群体”,以指数级增加解决问题的输入,从而显著增加合作,从而实现解决问题。有人认为,这些发展预示着一个参与式研究的新时代,或研究的民主化,为解决全球社会问题提供了新的希望。本文试图为此做出贡献,并承认社会理论在科学研究过程中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes contributions in English and French from all fields of social aspects of HIV/AIDS (care, support, behaviour change, behavioural surveillance, counselling, impact, mitigation, stigma, discrimination, prevention, treatment, adherence, culture, faith-based approaches, evidence-based intervention, health communication, structural and environmental intervention, financing, policy, media, etc).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信